Who else wants to see LBJ win it all just so...

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,300
Reputation
2,152
Daps
68,401
Nightmarish turnover rate? Lebron had his worst turnover season ever (joined a new squad and had to figure out rhythm with them), yet he still had fewer turnovers than Kobe did in his worst season. And before this year, Kobe had FOUR seasons with a higher turnover rate than Lebron's worst season ever. Lebron has slightly more career turnovers/game than Kobe, but only because Kobe rarely had to handle the ball during the Shaq days when the Lakers had an elite squad - ever since Shaq left and Kobe averaged a horrific 4.1 turnovers a game the next season, Kobe has had a worse turnover rate than Lebron.

Literally no one argues that Kobe is a better passer than Lebron. It's not even just the assist stats (like Kobe's best full season being worse than every Lebron season since his rookie year). Lebron makes more assists, looks for the assists more, sees the asissts better, makes better decisions on assists, and makes nicer passes on assists. His lifetime assist/turnover ratio is 6.9/3.4, while Kobe's is 4.8/3.0, and Lebron did most of that with far inferior teammates to pass to. Again, no one argues this.

Lebron is also a better rebounder than Kobe. Don't know how you missed that one, but the guy averaging 7.1 boards for his career (8.5 in the playoffs) is a better rebounder than the guy averaging 5.3 boards (and only 5.1 in the playoffs).

Lebron is a better scorer at the rim than Kobe is. Again, this isn't an argument - among perimeter players, Lebron is there with MJ as the greatest scorers at the rim ever, and has probably gotten more clutch shots at the rim than any other player in history. This isn't even a strong area for Kobe.

Lebron has a higher career 3pt% than Kobe. For his career, Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game as a 34% clip. For his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game at a 33% clip. Lebron has a higher % in the playoffs as well until he lost his shot for the first 2 rounds this season and hs number cratered (Kobe's numbers would have cratered too with his awful three-point shooting over the last 5 seasons, but he hardly made the playoffs). Argue shooting mechanics all you want, but then you have to explain why Lebron managed to get results in real games better than Kobe did.

Lebron is better at defending 5s, 4s, 3s, and 1s than Kobe is. Literally the only position which Kobe defends better than Lebron is the 2. Lebron is the guy who is sent to guard the other team's best player much more often than Kobe is, even when that's a point guard. And Lebron is a more disruptive off-ball defender than Kobe, averaging more steals (1.7 to 1.5) and more blocks (0.9 to 0.5) for his career. No one on Earth believes that Kobe is a better shot-blocker than Lebron. No one on Earth believes that Kobe defends big men better than Lebron. Adn most people acknowledge that Lebron defends 1s and 3s better than Kobe too.

Finally, Lebron runs the offense better than Kobe. Kobe is a better ball-handler, but Lebron is better at actually guiding the whole team from the point, which is why he's been doing it from his rookie season and Kobe's only done it occastionally over his career, and usually with hero-ball results.

So your assertion that Kobe does "literally everything better but pass"? :camby: Passing, rebounding, scoring at the rim, blocking shots, and defending bigs are all no-brainers, and Lebron's had better results on running the offense, defending PGs, and hitting threes too. You sound like a fool.
You Ethered that fukkboy. Too bad he's a Tobe nut sucker who just hates Bron. I wouldn't even waste my time on a nikka with a puppy in his avi.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
The ts% is NOT similar.

Lebron's career TS% is 58% in the regular season and 57% in the playoffs
Kobe's career TS% is 55% in the regular season and 54% in the playofs.

Except we weren't discussing career

Lebron's done that while facing 3 fantastic Indiana defenses, 3 strong Boston defenses, 5 tries from Thibs defenses, 3 of the best San Antonio teams, and 2 prime Detroit teams.

Kobe faced the 2003 Spurs and 2004 Pistons plus those Boston teams just stop fam :bryan:

And the Pistons last prime year was 2005

he has more years), because he got to feast when weak defensive teams like the Blazers/Suns/Jazz were some of the top teams in the Western Conference.

The irony of this dumb and false statement :bryan:


Didn't bother to do the actual math myself but saw through a quick google search that through 4 games of that Final LeBron was averaging 3.5 points in the 4th quarter, in 7.5 minutes. So if your argument is that he's scoring in "garbage time" or when the game's "out of reach" you're making yourself look insanely stupid.

And before you say it...Game 1 stats are skewed because he was out with cramps and Game 4 they were down 21 and the game was cooked when he checked in. Game 2 he had 8 points in the 4th and Game 3 was his only actual bad performance.

LeBron TORCHED Kawhi in that series, anyone who isn't a partial fukk knows that Finals loss wasn't on him.


The games were blowouts by halftime :what:
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,784
Reputation
-3,450
Daps
58,863
Reppin
NULL
How many of you retards struggle to comprehend the fact that Kobe is always going to get that nod right now because his legacy is pretty much already written? He might continue to play but his career is more or less done, he won't garner anymore accolades. You're talking about 19 years to LeBron's 12 and counting. It's the same reason why you sound equally retarded saying "5>2" as if these dudes are both long retired and their ring count is finalized.
Ok so what if Bron doesn't
Nightmarish turnover rate? Lebron had his worst turnover season ever (joined a new squad and had to figure out rhythm with them), yet he still had fewer turnovers than Kobe did in his worst season. And before this year, Kobe had FOUR seasons with a higher turnover rate than Lebron's worst season ever. Lebron has slightly more career turnovers/game than Kobe, but only because Kobe rarely had to handle the ball during the Shaq days when the Lakers had an elite squad - ever since Shaq left and Kobe averaged a horrific 4.1 turnovers a game the next season, Kobe has had a worse turnover rate than Lebron.

Literally no one argues that Kobe is a better passer than Lebron. It's not even just the assist stats (like Kobe's best full season being worse than every Lebron season since his rookie year). Lebron makes more assists, looks for the assists more, sees the asissts better, makes better decisions on assists, and makes nicer passes on assists. His lifetime assist/turnover ratio is 6.9/3.4, while Kobe's is 4.8/3.0, and Lebron did most of that with far inferior teammates to pass to. Again, no one argues this.

Lebron is also a better rebounder than Kobe. Don't know how you missed that one, but the guy averaging 7.1 boards for his career (8.5 in the playoffs) is a better rebounder than the guy averaging 5.3 boards (and only 5.1 in the playoffs).

Lebron is a better scorer at the rim than Kobe is. Again, this isn't an argument - among perimeter players, Lebron is there with MJ as the greatest scorers at the rim ever, and has probably gotten more clutch shots at the rim than any other player in history. This isn't even a strong area for Kobe.

Lebron has a higher career 3pt% than Kobe. For his career, Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game as a 34% clip. For his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game at a 33% clip. Lebron has a higher % in the playoffs as well until he lost his shot for the first 2 rounds this season and hs number cratered (Kobe's numbers would have cratered too with his awful three-point shooting over the last 5 seasons, but he hardly made the playoffs). Argue shooting mechanics all you want, but then you have to explain why Lebron managed to get results in real games better than Kobe did.

Lebron is better at defending 5s, 4s, 3s, and 1s than Kobe is. Literally the only position which Kobe defends better than Lebron is the 2. Lebron is the guy who is sent to guard the other team's best player much more often than Kobe is, even when that's a point guard. And Lebron is a more disruptive off-ball defender than Kobe, averaging more steals (1.7 to 1.5) and more blocks (0.9 to 0.5) for his career. No one on Earth believes that Kobe is a better shot-blocker than Lebron. No one on Earth believes that Kobe defends big men better than Lebron. Adn most people acknowledge that Lebron defends 1s and 3s better than Kobe too.

Finally, Lebron runs the offense better than Kobe. Kobe is a better ball-handler, but Lebron is better at actually guiding the whole team from the point, which is why he's been doing it from his rookie season and Kobe's only done it occastionally over his career, and usually with hero-ball results.

So your assertion that Kobe does "literally everything better but pass"? :camby: Passing, rebounding, scoring at the rim, blocking shots, and defending bigs are all no-brainers, and Lebron's had better results on running the offense, defending PGs, and hitting threes too. You sound like a fool.
Kobe is a better winner than LeBron.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
Similar rebound rates RELATIVE to their position :snoop:

Oh, so now you're going to move the goalposts and it's "relative to their position" that counts?

Lebron's still a better rebounder "relative to his position" than Kobe is.

Well, by that argument, Lebron is a FAR better passer "relative to his position", a FAR better ball-handler "relative to his position", a FAR better defender of point guards "relative to his position", a FAR better runner of the offense "relative to his position", and a FAR better three-point shooter "relative to his position".

But I'm sure that you'd rather cherry pick and use "relative to his position" for that single stat, right?




Finishing wasn't a strong suit for Kobe? :mjlol:

Not at Lebron's level. Neither the numbers nor the eye test tells anyone that Kobe is as good at getting to the rim and finishing as Lebron is.



on WAYYYYY less volume

Are you stupid? Can't read what I already put right there for you? Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game for his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game for his career.

Lebron has MORE volume than Kobe, not WAYYYYY less.


You see, this where a reasonable person says, "I thought Lebron had WAYYYYY less volume on threes than Kobe, but he actually has more. My Kobe Stanned-eyes must be lying to me, I should reevaluate my position."

But you won't, because that's not what Kobe Stans do. You'll now just proceed to ignore the blatant factual inaccuracy you just made, and will make more of them.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
Lebron's still a better rebounder "relative to his position" than Kobe is.

But he isn't :mjlol:

Lebron is a FAR better ball-handler "relative to his position", a FAR better defender of point guards and a FAR better three-point shooter "relative to his position".

nope nope and nope :russ:


Not at Lebron's level. Neither the numbers nor the eye test tells anyone that Kobe is as good at getting to the rim and finishing as Lebron is..


You said Kobe was not an elite finisher.....nothing to do with Lebron


Are you stupid? Can't read what I already put right there for you? Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game for his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game for his career.

Lebron has MORE volume than Kobe, not WAYYYYY less.


Kobe 5079 3 pt attempted

Lebron 3671 3 pt attempted

You failed math and english, huh? :laff::laff::laff::laff:
 

360Waves

2 girls and they get along like I'm Lou Will
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
4,606
Reputation
-1,410
Daps
31,274
Reppin
NYC
The games were blowouts by halftime :what:
Trying to score and will your team back to wins during the 2nd half is "scoring in garbage time" now. :russ: Let's ignore the fact that no matter when Kawhi and Diaw were guarding him he was torching them, the numbers speak for themselves. I hate fakkits like you because lord knows if this were Kobe you'd be talking about his "killer instinct" and how he never stops trying to compete even if his team is down.

I forgot, aggression is "stat padding" when you're Bron and "killer instinct" when you're Kobe. And LORD KNOWs if LeBron wasn't scoring during those 2nd halfs you'd be the first fakkit to talk about "this is why he'll never be better than Jordan. He isn't scoring, blah blah." You losers never cease to amaze me.
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
Except we weren't discussing career

We're not discussing career? Then what do you want to discuss? Just Lebron's prime? Okay then, in 2009-2014, name 2 full playoff seasons in which Lebron's TS% was less than his career playoff TS% of 57%, or anywhere even close to Kobe's playoff TS% of 54%.

I'll be waiting.



Kobe faced the 2003 Spurs and 2004 Pistons plus those Boston teams just stop fam :bryan:

You mean that Boston squad that held Kobe to 6-24 shooting in Game 7 of the Finals?

I threw out 15 squads. You threw out 4.




But he isn't :mjlol:


nope nope and nope :russ:

I give the numbers and facts, and you're now reduced to, "But he isn't" and "nope nope nope" with faces. You lose.



You said Kobe was not an elite finisher.....nothing to do with Lebron

Uh, I thought we were comparing Kobe to Lebron. That's the whole point of this exercise, right? And you misquoted me - I said it wasn't a strong suit for him.



Kobe 5079 3 pt attempted

Lebron 3671 3 pt attempted

You failed math and english, huh? :laff::laff::laff::laff:

No way you are this stupid in the rest of your life. This has to be a special disease that only comes up with Kobe is being talked about.

Kobe has played 19 seasons. Lebron has played 12 seasons.

Kobe has shot 267 threes/season. Lebron has shot 306 threes/season. And Lebron has made them at a higher rate.

Lebron shoots threes at a higher volume than Kobe. You can't deny that.

And up there at the top, didn't you say, "but we weren't discussing career"??? Do you know what the phrase "cherry-picking" means?
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
32,653
Reputation
9,929
Daps
109,181
Reppin
Brooklyn
We're not discussing career? Then what do you want to discuss? Just Lebron's prime? Okay then, in 2009-2014, name 2 full playoff seasons in which Lebron's TS% was less than his career playoff TS% of 57%, or anywhere even close to Kobe's playoff TS% of 54%.

I'll be waiting.





You mean that Boston squad that held Kobe to 6-24 shooting in Game 7 of the Finals?

I threw out 15 squads. You threw out 4.






I give the numbers and facts, and you're now reduced to, "But he isn't" and "nope nope nope" with faces. You lose.





Uh, I thought we were comparing Kobe to Lebron. That's the whole point of this exercise, right? And you misquoted me - I said it wasn't a strong suit for him.





No way you are this stupid in the rest of your life. This has to be a special disease that only comes up with Kobe is being talked about.

Kobe has played 19 seasons. Lebron has played 12 seasons.

Kobe has shot 267 threes/season. Lebron has shot 306 threes/season. And Lebron has made them at a higher rate.

Lebron shoots threes at a higher volume than Kobe. You can't deny that.

And up there at the top, didn't you say, "but we weren't discussing career"??? Do you know what the phrase "cherry-picking" means?
They always do this. They're like ex wives and lawyers. Blatantly lying about things and leaving out details or changing their story as they go until they just simply start yelling rings or "nah uh Kobe is better". I've even seen them argue Wade needed Shaq in 2006 but ignore 1996-2004 as well as the fact that in the 2006 finals Shaq averaged 13.7/10.2 while Wade was scoring 34.7. That's an even larger gap than Shaq over Kobe from 2000-2002.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
Kobe has played 19 seasons. Lebron has played 12 seasons.

Kobe has shot 267 threes/season. Lebron has shot 306 threes/season. And Lebron has made them at a higher rate.

Lebron shoots threes at a higher volume than Kobe.


rate and volume are not synonymous


fail 9th grade algebra :russ:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
rate and volume are not synonymous


fail 9th grade algebra :russ:


You fail for not knowing basic basketball terminology. Is Tim Duncan a "volume shooter" because he's taken 20,000 career shots? :russ:

"Volume shooting" in the NBA is taking a lot of shots when you're in the game. It is NOT a comment on the length of your career. It's like the Kobe Stan elite level.


So tell me, explain your argument.

I told you that Lebron shot threes at a higher % than Kobe did. :umad:

I told you that Lebron made more threes/game than Kobe did. :umad:

I told you that Lebron made more threes/season than Kobe did. :umad:


But to a Kobe Stan, Kobe is better because he's had WAAAAAAYYY more volume on threes than Lebron, by which you now claim to have meant....just that he's been around longer. :rudy:

WTF about the fact that Kobe has played more seasons have anything to do with our discussion of three-point shooting? :mindblown:
 
Last edited:

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,851
Daps
204,038
Reppin
the ether
They always do this. They're like ex wives and lawyers. Blatantly lying about things and leaving out details or changing their story as they go until they just simply start yelling rings or "nah uh Kobe is better". I've even seen them argue Wade needed Shaq in 2006 but ignore 1996-2004 as well as the fact that in the 2006 finals Shaq averaged 13.7/10.2 while Wade was scoring 34.7. That's an even larger gap than Shaq over Kobe from 2000-2002.

Actually, that gap is sort of close for the 2000 Finals. Remember, that year Kobe only averaged 19/5/4 in the regular season, 21/4/4 in the playoffs, and an embarassing 15/5/4 in the Finals on 37% shooting. Meanwhile, Shaq was averaging 35 and 18 on 60% shooting.

At least in the 2000 NBA Finals, Kobe was certainly less help to his team overall than Shaq was in 2006.
 
Last edited:

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,469
Daps
246,399
not know what the word volume means and embarrass yourself :dead:
 
Top