You're willfully changing the scope of the argument. Who cares if 50 had five superb records twelve years ago if today he is dropping garbage?
Because I don't give a fukk about popularity contests. and this is what modern rap has devolved into. Which is why the genre is such garbage.
I'd rather have someone come into the genre, drop an amazing slew of records, then fall the fukk off. Than some lame coast along in the genre for decades dropping devoted doo doo. Person A at least raised the bar. Person B does everything in his power to keep the bar low.
We're hip hop fans with memories, not goldfish.
At what point will past success no longer be an excuse for present mediocrity?
This question would make sense if people still thought 50 was hot and acted like he's still dropping fire. Just like people do with my favorite rapper Nas. They'll overrate his modern catalogue just because he dropped one of the best albums in music history long ago.
More importantly, if we're going to look at who's made something "lasting" or that can be cherished, wouldn't you want to place your money on the guy who's virtually birthed numerous artists, many of whom are very popular today?
What is this, a contest? My nikka, I don't give a fukk. I'm a music fan. I just want good music I can always play.
Gucci has birthed disposable garbage. That's nothing to be proud of. In fact, Gucci hasn't birthed it really. He was just the right nikka at the right time. Lots of external circumstances birthed Gucci and other trash hip hop artists. Jeezy birthed Gucci, yet you're not talking about garbage ass snowman. And when the smoke clears, his legacy is questionable.
Make it clear - I'm not 'hating' on Gucci because he's not lyrical miracle spiritual. I'm hating on him because his music is vapid and dull. There's nothing inspiring about it at all. Doesn't inspire me to dance, to feel, to be bold... nothing. It's just generic ratchet fodder.
A couple summers ago it was Migos, this summer looks like it's going to be Fetty Wap, shyt, even Young Thug cites Gucci as one of his prime mentors; Zaytoven is as popular as ever and his production style is getting copied by others.
fukkem
As for your first remark, please explain how retention of fans is not something that is affected by the strength of your discography? 50 came out of the gate huge, and was the biggest artist in the world at the time if you ask some people. Is he anywhere near that level of fame or relevance today? Is he even that dedicated to his music still? Gucci on the other hand has steadily risen in popularity, and has gained acceptance. He's done so by providing his listeners will ample, free, consistent music; and he's very attentive to what his fans like and don't like.
Again, this isn't a popularity contest and it's pathetic that we're concerned about that in hip hop, as opposed to who has made powerful music. By the way, more people play 50 worldwide than Gucci so even by that metric, you lose. Sure it's his old shyt, but the fact of the matter is that his tracks have more staying power than Gucci.
Gucci just floods the market with crap to keep himself relevant for his fans. He'll fall off completely when most of you grow out of his music or he stops releasing. And he won't be doing shows outside his home state a decade after the fact like 50 is.
Who by the way is doing shows worldwide a decade after the fact.
Gucci Mane... And it's pretty easy to me
Take away GRODT and a few mixtape songs and 50 is left with nothing. I can't remember a dope 50 song from the last 5 years
But you can't take that away from him. that's what's hilarious about this thread.
You're forcing Gucci's legacy, while 50 already has one cemented in stone. There is no comparison.