avon barksdale
i want my corners
Trap house>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> baltimore love thing
but 50s music does?Because I don't give a fukk about popularity contests. and this is what modern rap has devolved into. Which is why the genre is such garbage.
I'd rather have someone come into the genre, drop an amazing slew of records, then fall the fukk off. Than some lame coast along in the genre for decades dropping devoted doo doo. Person A at least raised the bar. Person B does everything in his power to keep the bar low.
We're hip hop fans with memories, not goldfish.
This question would make sense if people still thought 50 was hot and acted like he's still dropping fire. Just like people do with my favorite rapper Nas. They'll overrate his modern catalogue just because he dropped one of the best albums in music history long ago.
What is this, a contest? My nikka, I don't give a fukk. I'm a music fan. I just want good music I can always play.
Gucci has birthed disposable garbage. That's nothing to be proud of. In fact, Gucci hasn't birthed it really. He was just the right nikka at the right time. Lots of external circumstances birthed Gucci and other trash hip hop artists. Jeezy birthed Gucci, yet you're not talking about garbage ass snowman. And when the smoke clears, his legacy is questionable.
Make it clear - I'm not 'hating' on Gucci because he's not lyrical miracle spiritual. I'm hating on him because his music is vapid and dull. There's nothing inspiring about it at all. Doesn't inspire me to dance, to feel, to be bold... nothing. It's just generic ratchet fodder.
fukkem
Again, this isn't a popularity contest and it's pathetic that we're concerned about that in hip hop, as opposed to who has made powerful music. By the way, more people play 50 worldwide than Gucci so even by that metric, you lose. Sure it's his old shyt, but the fact of the matter is that his tracks have more staying power than Gucci.
Gucci just floods the market with crap to keep himself relevant for his fans. He'll fall off completely when most of you grow out of his music or he stops releasing. And he won't be doing shows outside his home state a decade after the fact like 50 is.
Who by the way is doing shows worldwide a decade after the fact.
But you can't take that away from him. that's what's hilarious about this thread.
You're forcing Gucci's legacy, while 50 already has one cemented in stone. There is no comparison.

but 50s music does?
no disrespect, you saying a bunch of bullshyt. that line is better than gucci's whole discography, yet i know damn well you ain't listened to enough Gucci to even make a statement like that. you on that music snob shyt. you overrating the fukk outta 50, making it seem like he's done lyrical behemoth, he's not though. it's crazy how you shyt on gucci and praise 50 when their subject matter is virtually the same.
you can't even speak on this subject. 
your whole argument is ignorant. you've heard maybe 30 songs, yet his music is dull, and one 50 cent line is better than his whole discography?you can't even speak on this subject.
50 and Gucci are way more comparable than ross and raekwon.![]()

you're speaking on a discography while having heard less than 1 percent of said discography.The nikkas discograpgy is trash. Dude release an album or mixtape every other week and their all garbage.it's not?you're speaking on a discography while having heard less than 1 percent of said discography.
Nikka don't even sell shyt and never sold shyt. Jungle >>>> Gucci Mane
it's not?you're speaking on a discography while having heard less than 1 percent of said discography.
