I'm back. And reading this post I see MORE of the same. Nothing in this post once again shows us HOW Garvey directly influenced African-Americans or how his plans helped African-Americans compared to MLK. Once again all I see is you trying to argue how
amazing Garvey was(which is nice), but worse using flawed ABC logic like "see! see! Rosa and X also looked up to Garvey and so he is responsible for ALL their ideas!" Which is a big reach and is all the Garvey supporters been doing this whole thread.
I've have not seen why Garvey deserves to be at the seat of the greatest AA leaders. Anyways now that i am at a computer and not on my phone lets demolish some errors.
I find it funny that people continue to misinterpret this part of what King meant. What he meant was that REPARATIONS WAS NEEDED, not that
integration was the problem. All King did was just update his ideas.
Also REPARATION that King was not only aiming for, but something a capitalist like Garvey has never aimed for.
So me Garvey fighting for African-American reparation. I'll wait.
Yeah that's nice and all, but with little capital its moot. MANY leaders especially the Nation of Islam have built INFRASTRUCTURE and practiced SELF SUFFICIENCY but with lack of capital with was all moot for LIBERATION. Something MLK was aiming for. Basically the root of the problem. Infrastructure and self-sufficiency comes AFTER we gained capital and liberation.
You want infrastructure? Okay fine. I'll take economic liberation.
Okay? Your point? Its saying that the UNIA had 4 million members total not that they were all in NYC. The UNIA had many members not just in America but internationally especially in the Caribbean. How does this even prove that he was more influential on AAs than freaking MLK??? MLK was ALSO able to amass millions with his movement in America.
Once again more saying how "amazing" Garvey was instead of what plans he had that succeeded in
helping AAs.
50 Years After Selma: How Much Has Life Changed For Blacks In America?
African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968) - New World Encyclopedia
Fair Housing Act of 1968 - Black History - HISTORY.com
Voting Rights Act (1965)
And THIS IS JUST the tip of the iceberg. You all may(foolishly) "c00n" shyt, but it improved the quality of LIFE for blacks. Not only that it gave us steps for economic liberation especially local voting.
Show me Garvey doing ANY of this..
Empower us? Nice. Again with WHAT capital!? Garvey was a capitalist and while his plans were good most of them were unrealistic for a minority group like African-Americans. What your saying is in the same lane as those in the "Group economics" circle. While it is a good bandage(after the wood has healed), it does not address the big wound/how to heal it.
I agree with 100% with Garvey that we NEED intra-diasporan trade and with Africa. But the thing is we are not there
yet. Especially with the little capital that we have to fund these things. Garvey being a capitalist and using it to drive his plans were flawed however. We need Kings ideas FIRST before we get to Garvey's.
PS: I was MORE on board Garvey before I did more research(unlike many here) King's true goals and thus updating my opinions.
Okay? And? MLK was the one who led the bus boycott.
What the heck do you mean we should have stuck? Again, his plans were
unrealistic for a disenfranchised
minority group like African-Americans. His plans for more ideal for blacks with their OWN nation states. Most of Garvey's plans were never going to work on the level that he wanted because again they were unrealistic for a group such as AAs. We're not even at that stage yet.
However its still not to late for a new Poor People's Campaign.
Silly hotep shyt. How about you and others stop making me slap my palms against my forehead and READ some of MLK's true intentions.
And speaking of "owning ones own bus..."
Montgomery bus boycott :
Segregationists used economic violence. “
The white people tried to break the boycott by not giving the church cars any insurance. All the churches operated the station wagons, and had their names on the sides. Without insurance, the cars could not operate legally. Every time they got insurance from a new company, the policy would suddenly be canceled.” (
The eventual solution to that issue was “Dr. King got in touch with a black insurance agent in Atlanta named T. M. Alexander, and T. M. Alexander got Lloyd’s of London…to write a policy for the church-operated cars.”
Once again more hotep 101 logic. Maybe its because King had a more freaking reach and influence in American than Garvey(and Malcolm X)!????
Can it be that? And if King never had the juice then neither did Garvey especially as most of his plans did not succeed for AAs.
Meanwhile MLK as
@Poitier once said "got it" and found the blue print for African-American liberation. MLK's blue print is STILL there unlike with Garvey's.
Thread is titled, "Who is greatest
African American leader ever", which Garvey is not African American but born in Jamaica. Its that simple.
This post shows us who never read MLK's true intention but instead those who just rambles hotep projections on MLK. The bolded screams this loudly. How about you stop spreading nonsense and actually pick up a book(and not those PBS specials) on MLK.
MLK wanted this country to allow us in? Here is his definition of integration vs. the hotep(and other civil rights leaders) definition.
Still Separate, Still Unequal
MLK only cared for improving the QUALITY OF LIFE for blacks. Not some, "iZ wants 2 beez murican 2!" That was what his definition of integration was about. He soon realized that he had to update his plans and aim for full scale reparation. Show me Garvey trying to organize anything CLOSE to this...
Poor People's Campaign - Wikipedia
Yeah... Garvey wanted "truly free." Nice, but he never had the blue prints for it. Especially not for AAs...
Like I said everything points to MLK being the GOAT AA leader and there is no debate. He is more well known not because some dumbass hotep crap logic that, "buh! buh! buh! cacs luv him mur!" but because he had more influence and organized African-Americans on a larger scale than X or Garvey.