Who ranks higher , Timmy or Kobe ?

Who ranks higher


  • Total voters
    257

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
16,973
Reputation
7,585
Daps
52,178
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
HE HAS 6 LESS RINGS IN ALMOST THE SAME AMOUNT OF TRIPS TO THE FINALS COMBINED TOO

:skip:

THAT NONSENSE ABOUT WEAK SHOT SELECTION IS NOT EVEN TRUE

HIS WILLINGNESS TO TAKE SHOTS NO ONE ELSE WOULD IS WHAT MADE HIM THE MOST FEARLESS PLAYER OF ALL TIME, WHO HIT SOME OF THE BIGGEST SHOTS EVER OFF THAT CONFIDENCE, WHICH IN TURN MADE HIM THE GOAT

And yet with 6 fewer rings than them both combined, it's a consensus that Bron is not just ahead of both, he's way ahead. Literally no entity of note has Bron ranked alongside Duncan or Kobe, there's always a gap of several players from those guys to Bron...

Which means muhfukkas obviously aren't blind ring counting, and as far as the rings go, they understand they all aren't won the same...

Kobe hit "some" of the biggest shots EVER? How many of these abd when did they occur?
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,937
Reputation
2,773
Daps
67,443
Reppin
NYC
Kobe won the 2010 finals with 4 working fingers in his shooting hand but nah that never happened
I forgot about the finger too.

the starting center Andrew Bynums knee was fukked up too.

But again the lakers got all the breaks and the Spurs just had bad luck
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
48,454
Reputation
9,859
Daps
239,005
I forgot about the finger too.

the starting center Andrew Bynums knee was fukked up too.

But again the lakers got all the breaks and the Spurs just had bad luck


Right. We probably win 08 if Bynum doesn’t get hurt too
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
48,454
Reputation
9,859
Daps
239,005
“Black men” out here relying on top 10 lists created by nerdy media cacs :laff:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,141
Reppin
the ether
The Spurs weren’t a dynasty either. Great run but no dynasty, the main reason is they never won back to back.

How you a dynasty but in the middle of your run another team 3 peats and owns you in the playoffs lol. I never got the Spurs we’re a dynasty thing. The 80’s Celtics weren’t a dynasty either, because like the Spurs they never won back to back and another team owned them in the playoffs during their run


So the '80s Lakers weren't a dynasty until they won that 5th title in '88? They didn't have any back-to-backs until then and Bird had won 3 right in the middle of their run. From '81 to '86 Bird won more titles than Magic/Kareem did together. :skip:


You're making up arguments that NO ONE made back then. Just total ignorance.


And bringing up '00-'02 as if that discredits the Spurs dynasty is just dumb. That wasn't "the middle of their run", Duncan didn't even play in the '00 postseason due to injury and the roster outside of Duncan was complete trash in '01 and '02. Calling that the middle of their title run is like saying that '05 to '07 was the middle of the Laker dynasty.

Duncan had a one-off title in '99, a dynasty from '03 to '07, and then another run in '13/'14. And he was the leader of all three. Whereas Kobe over a 20-year career was only able to lead his team to a single '08-'10 run, and was either losing or a sidekick the other 17 years.
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,937
Reputation
2,773
Daps
67,443
Reppin
NYC
So the '80s Lakers weren't a dynasty until they won that 5th title in '88? :skip:


You're making up arguments that NO ONE made back then. Just total ignorance.


And bringing up '00-'02 as if that discredits the Spurs dynasty is just dumb. That wasn't "the middle of their run", Duncan didn't even play in the '00 postseason due to injury and the roster outside of Duncan was complete trash in '01 and '02. Calling that the middle of their title run is like saying that '05 to '07 was the middle of the Laker dynasty.

Duncan had a one-off title in '99, a dynasty from '03 to '07, and then another run in '13/'14. And he was the leader of all three. Whereas Kobe over a 20-year career was only able to lead his team to a single '08-'10 run, and was either losing or a sidekick the other 17 years.
If you don’t win back to back you’re not a dynasty. Every era doesn’t have one. The Spurs weren’t at all. You can’t be dynasty when another team owned you in the playoffs and threepeated. Lol of course I’m gonna count 00-02, that was apart of their run. The problem is someone else was just better.

Also why you so hostile? I’m just shooting the shyt
 
Last edited:

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
48,454
Reputation
9,859
Daps
239,005
So the '80s Lakers weren't a dynasty until they won that 5th title in '88? :skip:


You're making up arguments that NO ONE made back then. Just total ignorance.


And bringing up '00-'02 as if that discredits the Spurs dynasty is just dumb. That wasn't "the middle of their run", Duncan didn't even play in the '00 postseason due to injury and the roster outside of Duncan was complete trash in '01 and '02. Calling that the middle of their title run is like saying that '05 to '07 was the middle of the Laker dynasty.

Duncan had a one-off title in '99, a dynasty from '03 to '07, and then another run in '13/'14. And he was the leader of all three. Whereas Kobe over a 20-year career was only able to lead his team to a single '08-'10 run, and was either losing or a sidekick the other 17 years.


So kobe gets no credit for the 3peat :laff: TD barely averages 20ppg during some runs and gets all the credit but Kobe drops 30ppg and was the #1 option in the 4th qtr the whole 3 peat but was just a sidekick.:dead:
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
48,454
Reputation
9,859
Daps
239,005
If you don’t win back to back you’re not a dynasty. Every era doesn’t have one. The Spurs weren’t at all. You can’t be dynasty when another team owned you in the playoffs and threepeated.


He’s giving Kobe no credit for the 3 peat. That’s where a lot of this bullshyt comes from. Calling him a sidekick when he literally took over 4th qtr after 4th qtr and was dropping 40+ for entire months at some points
 

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,937
Reputation
2,773
Daps
67,443
Reppin
NYC
Spurs fans say their “dynasty” started in 1999, if that’s the case then that’s a problem cause another team on their watch won 3 straight and went to another finals(beating them on the way) in 5 years.

I’m also dying at the excuse that citing 00-02 isn’t fair because they weren’t as good as the lakers in 01-02🤣. Thats the point entirely 🤣🤣 they weren’t as good
 

10bandz

RIP to the GOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jul 27, 2015
Messages
48,454
Reputation
9,859
Daps
239,005
Spurs fans say their “dynasty” started in 1999, if that’s the case then that’s a problem cause another team on their watch won 3 straight and went to another finals(beating them on the way) in 5 years.

I’m also dying at the excuse that citing 00-02 isn’t fair because they weren’t as good as the lakers in 01-02🤣. Thats the point entirely 🤣🤣🤣


Exactly. This fakkit gives TD a pass in 01-02 cuz his team was ass but at the same time holds 05-07 against Kobe :laff:
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
62,116
Reputation
-20,478
Daps
79,584
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
And yet with 6 fewer rings than them both combined, it's a consensus that Bron is not just ahead of both, he's way ahead. Literally no entity of note has Bron ranked alongside Duncan or Kobe, there's always a gap of several players from those guys to Bron...

Which means muhfukkas obviously aren't blind ring counting, and as far as the rings go, they understand they all aren't won the same...

Kobe hit "some" of the biggest shots EVER? How many of these abd when did they occur?

UNTIL U STEP AWAY FROM THE UNATHLETIC FAT CAC MEDIA AND ASK THE ACTUAL PLAYERS WHO COMPETED AGAINST THEM…..


:dead:
 
Top