Who’s wrong in this situation?

[Eddie_1100]

Have kids in 2019 brehs

we got too many people on this planet as it is.

 

[Eddie_1100]

No matter how you spin it she was wrong she took money that was meant for something and spent it on her other kids because she couldn’t get their dads to contribute. He’s not a bytch for wanting certain things for HIS child.

She was wrong for taking care of all of her kids, got it.

 

[shopthatwrecks]

No matter how you spin it she was wrong she took money that was meant for something and spent it on her other kids because she couldn’t get their dads to contribute. He’s not a bytch for wanting certain things for HIS child.

so u got 3 kids...

1 nikka doin his job...givin u say 1000 a month no child support for his seed ...for school...



u not gone divide it between ya other two..if the nikkas aint bout shyt...

u gone do what the nikka tells u to do..lol

 

[IrateMastermind]

If you mad at how she spend the money don’t give her shyt but the minimum once you give it to her it’s hers.

If you want to do some extra shyt for your kid go get him the shyt you want him to have.
Don’t leave it up to her. She can’t tell you what to do with your money.

I think the entire situation is silly cuz the kid probably would sacrifice nice shyt to make sure his siblings have decent stuff if they all live together. The parents are the ones acting like kids.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

No matter how you spin it she was wrong she took money that was meant for something and spent it on her other kids because she couldn’t get their dads to contribute. He’s not a bytch for wanting certain things for HIS child.

I get that you think she's wrong but can you answer the question I asked you?

 

[shopthatwrecks]

If you mad at how she spend the money don’t give her shyt but the minimum once you give it to her it’s hers.

If you want to do some extra shyt for your kid go get him the shyt you want him to have.
Don’t leave it up to her. She can’t tell you what to do with your money.

I think the entire situation is silly cuz the kid probably would sacrifice nice shyt to make sure his siblings have decent stuff if they all live together. The parents are the ones acting like kids.

the father... is actin like a kid..

the mother is bein a sacrificing adult..

 

[Elle Driver]

It’s outta your hands when you give the money. You can’t control what happens. She’s just irresponsible.

 

[hostsamurai]

She’s wrong he gave her the money for his kid only. The other ones aren’t his responsibility. She honestly sounds like a bum. Why can’t she feed her kids? Or buy her kids clothes? If one is taken care of by his father why doesn’t she have enough money to do for the other ones?

The single mother seems totally fraudulent.

They both knew what was in the spirit of his action, and she went ahead and did something different to their agreed agenda. She's limiting the legitimate, rightful potential of the kid who's got a financially supportive dad so that her other kids don't have to suffer as much for her failure at picking life partners or practicing contraception.

 

[Cel 510 kid ados forever]

It’s outta your hands when you give the money. You can’t control what happens. She’s just irresponsible.

True Elle

U got to watch who u have kids with

 

[Eternally Jaded]

He's not wrong to feel pissed about the spend breakdown, but he is kinda petty, but most importantly, he's unrealistic about the situation he's in.

He might have one kid, but she's got three kids she's to consider. He shouldn't be surprised that she's gonna use whatever money coming in, to the benefit of the three.

You don't like it, do more than handing off an envelope or check.
Take your child shopping, get them their school supplies.
Keep the bookbag in your car n drop them off yourself.
Only way to make sure the other crumbsnatchers don't have access.

Basically, be super petty and super involved, to the point of being mean just cause you can.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Folks in here trying to give the kids that Cinderella treatment

:funny:

 

[Ashley Banks]

I'm not excited. You seem to be the only one worked up.

Of course it's hypocritical, it's been posted many times before. By why add extra information? That's not the only post you called her broke or a bum.

Let me ask you this, say somehow you and your husband split and you get remarried have another baby and that man dies. So now you have 3 child; one without a father.

Say you personally have $300 total to spend on the children. But your ex gives you $2000 to spend on his children. How would you as a mom deal with that.? Realistally, are the giving the 2 older children a stack each and only spending $300 on the youngest or are splitting that $2300 three ways?

No ones wound up, I’m just passing the time.

That’s why i said relax I didn’t add extra anything the person I was responding too did and I was responding to his new scenario. He said the kid would be eating steak and his siblings would be eating bacon bits so I said why is she unable to buy 2 more steaks if one is already paid for. Get it? I would not have added anything if I wasn’t responding to this post. Kind of like I’m about to respond to your different scenario. I’m not adding anything, just responding to you.

Anyways, before I spent the money my ex gave me for his kids I would ask my dad, brothers, sisters, mother etc for the money or to buy stuff for them. Or i would ask him if it was okay. If he said no, then I would spend $300 on all of the kids and tell him to take his children shopping separately. Maybe I just have a different mindset but I think it’s fukked up to force someone to take care of the kids I decided to have.

 

[Umoja]

This scenario came up before.

I would feel some type of way, but at the same time I think it would be more damaging for my kid in the long run to see his other siblings with less.

I would expect her to pay me back. Wouldn't push it but I would think less of her if she didn't.

 

[hostsamurai]

She was wrong for taking care of all of her kids, got it.

No she's wrong for discriminating against one child in favour of her other ill-begotten children. Also, acting against the spirit of an agreement.

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

No ones wound up, I’m just passing the time.

That’s why i said relax I didn’t add extra anything the person I was responding too did and I was responding to his new scenario. He said the kid would be eating steak and his siblings would be eating bacon bits so I said why is she unable to buy 2 more steaks if one is already paid for. Get it? I would not have added anything if I wasn’t responding to this post. Kind of like I’m about to respond to your different scenario. I’m not adding anything, just responding to you.

Anyways, before I spent the money my ex gave me for his kids I would ask my dad, brothers, sisters, mother etc for the money or to buy stuff for them. Or i would ask him if it was okay. If he said no, then I would $300 on all of the kids and tell him to take his children shopping separately.

So how is her splitting the money bum behavior but begging family for the money any better?

So you would then only spend $100 on the child with no father while the other 2 are getting $1100 each.

That answer makes no sense. The wishes of a man wouldn't come before the wellbeing of all my children.

Imma just agree to disagree with you on this one.