Why didn't Django haters call 12 years a slave a 'white savior movie'

[NvrCMyNut]

Saw Django for the first on Saturday, and that character that Samuel L played, offended me so much. I'm sorry but when it's comes to the issue of slavery, you don't do that to that character. That shyt was just downright disgusting and vulgar, and not even needed.

Samuel L is an embarrassment for playing that role

How you gon make a 'historically accurate' slave movie and have no house nikkas? Just another thing that makes the 'realistic' 12 years a slave overrated.

 

[frush11]

How you gon make a 'historically accurate' slave movie and have no house nikkas? Just another thing that makes the 'realistic' 12 years a slave overrated.

You obviously don't know anything about slavery

 

[observe]

D'jango was a great film..need to rewatch it..cacs getting blasted..blood everywhere...shyts comedy...what's there to hate

I'll watch 12 years a slave when it comes on fox television

 

[Ill-Yaz]

12YAS was boring as fukk.

Steve McQueen was fishing for accolades and black people were fishing for sympathy.

In Django, white people were getting massacred for the racism and thats what I wanted to see.

Excuse me for not liking the movie where the black protagonist is crying like a bytch when getting his back lashed.

 

[MostReal]

boy u can really see why some posters r in thr red after viewing this thread

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

How you gon make a 'historically accurate' slave movie and have no house nikkas? Just another thing that makes the 'realistic' 12 years a slave overrated.

So having more "house nikkas" would have made your dumb ass more comfortable huh?

Time to get off the c00n train friend.[DOUBLEPOST=1397584882][/DOUBLEPOST]

12YAS was boring as fukk.

Steve McQueen was fishing for accolades and black people were fishing for sympathy.

In Django, white people were getting massacred for the racism and thats what I wanted to see.

Excuse me for not liking the movie where the black protagonist is crying like a bytch when getting his back lashed.

Thats the reality that people actually went through you stupid c*nt. Sorry if that offends you.

 

[NvrCMyNut]

D'jango was a great film..need to rewatch it..cacs getting blasted..blood everywhere...shyts comedy...what's there to hate

I'll watch 12 years a slave when it comes on fox television

re-watched the movie for the third time 2 nights ago

 

[mson]

slave movies dont get made unless there is a white Savior

And that's why we will never see a movie about the Haitian revolution.

 

[Gravity]

How is Schultz a "white savior"? He explicitly says in the film that he is taking advantage of Django when they make the deal. Even though he is shown not to be a racist he explicitly acknowledges that he is taking advantage of the way blacks are viewed in his partnership with Django. Sandra Bullock's character in "The Blind Side" is a great example of "white savior", Schultz really isn't. Common sense will tell you that a black dude in Slavery era America would not be able to make the moves Django did without a white partner, that's not a 'white savior' thing, thats a logistics thing

You're explaining exactly how Schultz was painted as the white savior you're just too dumb to realize it. It's obvious that he his whole character in the movie was there to appease whites and show that they're not all bad. The excuse that his presence was necessary to the story for authenticity purposes when it's nothing but a modern day western/blaxploitation movie using slavery as the backdrop is laughable. It's a fantasy movie not one based on historical facts. There are countless historical inaccuracies in django regsrding slavery and tbe time period in general so your excuse doesn't begin to fly. Schultz wasn't "needed" in the movie for any other reason that to appeal to the white audience.

 

[Pifferry]

Because that's actually what happened in his life and white saviors did exist.

 

[MAKAVELI25]

You're explaining exactly how Schultz was painted as the white savior you're just too dumb to realize it. It's obvious that he his whole character in the movie was there to appease whites and show that they're not all bad. The excuse that his presence was necessary to the story for authenticity purposes when it's nothing but a modern day western/blaxploitation movie using slavery as the backdrop is laughable. It's a fantasy movie not one based on historical facts. There are countless historical inaccuracies in django regsrding slavery and tbe time period in general so your excuse doesn't begin to fly. Schultz wasn't "needed" in the movie for any other reason that to appeal to the white audience.

The white savior ideal is one that shows the 'white savior' as someone who is only doing what they are doing for noble purposes. Thus why Sandra Bullock's character in 'The Blind Side' is a good example of the white savior. She is depicted as helping the kid out of some selfless desire to propel him to success. Schultz is NOT a white savior because it is made clear that he does not have noble intentions. He QUITE BLATANTLY states this in the movie and admits that he is taking advantage of slavery era preconceptions about blacks in his dealings with Django. Call it whatever you want but Schultz is not a 'white savior'. Funny how you call me dumb when you have no idea what you are talking about


And even more evidence of YOUR OWN STUPIDITY: How exactly would Django, a black man, negotiate with Candy, a know racist and slaveholder, without a white liason? Don't worry, I'll wait

 

[Gravity]

The white savior ideal is one that shows the 'white savior' as someone who is only doing what they are doing for noble purposes. Thus why Sandra Bullock's character in 'The Blind Side' is a good example of the white savior. She is depicted as helping the kid out of some selfless desire to propel him to success. Schultz is NOT a white savior because it is made clear that he does not have noble intentions. He QUITE BLATANTLY states this in the movie and admits that he is taking advantage of slavery era preconceptions about blacks in his dealings with Django. Call it whatever you want but Schultz is not a 'white savior'. Funny how you call me dumb when you have no idea what you are talking about


And even more evidence of YOUR OWN STUPIDITY: How exactly would Django, a black man, negotiate with Candy, a know racist and slaveholder, without a white liason? Don't worry, I'll wait

You create an entire argument around your own bullshyt definition of "white savior" then act as if you've done something White saviors are simply that, white saviors. There's nothing that says that they have to be noble just to be noble and can't be flawed. Schultz was most certainly the white savior in Django. He literally saves Django from slavery, teaches him how to be a bounty hunter, aids him in his quest to save his wife, and actually kills the main villain of the movie. Not only was Schultz the white savior he was the actually the main character in a lot of ways. The fact that he admitted to being flawed doesn't take away from the fact that he wears the white savior of the film. His presence in the movie was to balance out all of the other bad-guy white characters. Your "bu bu how was Django supposed to negotiate with a slave master without a white man helping him" comment just illustrates how dumb you actually are. It was a made up story dumbfukk. The storyline was purposefully written so that Django would have to rely on a white savior. Tarantino or whoever could've easily made up a different story that didn't include a white savior but then white ppl wouldn't have gone to see it. Yous a dumb b*stard.

 

[Larry Lobster]

Both trash movies

 

[MAKAVELI25]

You create an entire argument around your own bullshyt definition of "white savior" then act as if you've done something White saviors are simply that, white saviors. There's nothing that says that they have to be noble just to be noble and can't be flawed. Schultz was most certainly the white savior in Django. He literally saves Django from slavery, teaches him how to be a bounty hunter, aids him in his quest to save his wife, and actually kills the main villain of the movie. Not only was Schultz the white savior he was the actually the main character in a lot of ways. The fact that he admitted to being flawed doesn't take away from the fact that he wears the white savior of the film. His presence in the movie was to balance out all of the other bad-guy white characters. Your "bu bu how was Django supposed to negotiate with a slave master without a white man helping him" comment just illustrates how dumb you actually are. It was a made up story dumbfukk. The storyline was purposefully written so that Django would have to rely on a white savior. Tarantino or whoever could've easily made up a different story that didn't include a white savior but then white ppl wouldn't have gone to see it. Yous a dumb b*stard.

You have no idea what a white savior is, your posts in this thread have been a whole bunch of stupid. Nice try though

 

[Gravity]

You have no idea what a white savior is, your posts in this thread have been a whole bunch of stupid. Nice try though

"white saviors" are simply white characters who save black characters in movies. Schultz fits that description to a tee. You're literally one of the dumbest motherfukkers on this site.