Why do these game developers continue to put cloaking perks in competitive MP?o
- Thread starter The G.O.D II
- Start date
Even though you Xbots shyt on KZ for days, they actually had in Shadow Fall the system you guys are talking about as far as weapons. All the weapons and most gadgets are unlocked for the most part so you aren't heading into a match against a 3 prestige rank dude with an OP gun. But*kermitsippingnastyliptonteaJPG*
we cant even flank in shooting games now !!?Adjusting is for the birds. Don't be a fakkit and see me in a gunfight or flank my entire squad for that sneak kill nikkas.
BasedPrime
Xbox Woe
Stupid rambo nikkas in this bytch 
Demonic Jenkins
Pro
I hate games where you have to start the match racing to the spot with the overpowered weapon...that's why I'm not a huge fan of gears anymore. I like load outs.
Yeah, but the profit margin is so huge that they will never go away.Simple answer really: Wales
Read an article awhile back on IGN that 80-90% of micro transactions are bought by 1% of gamers.
Now the numbers are off the top of my head but it was something close to that you get the picture
It's funny because when I think about it my favorite MP games I've ever played were all non loadout based or perk having(with the exception of UC2 since that had little perks) games.
Uncharted 2 kept it simple. AK, pistol and 2 grenades. You had a choice of two boosters(perks) and while there was a couple of perks that gave an advantage, they pretty much became everyone else's choices so it pretty much balanced itself out.
gears of war games kept it simple too except you could spawn with either a lancer or hammerburst. Gears 3 introduced the DBS, retro lancer and another pistol for starting weapons. Besides that everything else was about map knowledge and holding down the power weapons.
Halo 3 was the only halo game I really played besides reach and 4 and that one was the best imo out of those that I played. I don't even want to get into the disaster called Halo 4. Reach had it's issues but at least that had some semblance of balance after a few updates whereas 4 just was trash.
I just can't get into games with loadouts and laundry lists of perks. Must be why I'm not really into Titanfall(besides it being shallow imo) and BF4 can be a bit overwhelming at times.
Uncharted 2 kept it simple. AK, pistol and 2 grenades. You had a choice of two boosters(perks) and while there was a couple of perks that gave an advantage, they pretty much became everyone else's choices so it pretty much balanced itself out.
gears of war games kept it simple too except you could spawn with either a lancer or hammerburst. Gears 3 introduced the DBS, retro lancer and another pistol for starting weapons. Besides that everything else was about map knowledge and holding down the power weapons.
Halo 3 was the only halo game I really played besides reach and 4 and that one was the best imo out of those that I played. I don't even want to get into the disaster called Halo 4. Reach had it's issues but at least that had some semblance of balance after a few updates whereas 4 just was trash.
I just can't get into games with loadouts and laundry lists of perks. Must be why I'm not really into Titanfall(besides it being shallow imo) and BF4 can be a bit overwhelming at times.
we cant even flank in shooting games now !!?
...I said or flank for that kill...
Going invisible and getting those cheap kills gets no respect though. Earn your kills, either by playing smart, flanking, or straight gunning me down, don't be no fakkit.
Y'all some pussies, open your 
eyes and look at the screen, they aren't hard to see at all. Y'all new nikkas complain about EVERYTHING in gaming. Companies try give you new features and because you don't like it you start crying. It's not cheap it's tactical. It's like camo for everywhere and it's not like it's infinite (unless you use the Ghost squad Burn card in TF, but even that resets after death) I've never had a problem with invisibility in gaming but then again they aren't really invisible in the first place.
eyes and look at the screen, they aren't hard to see at all. Y'all new nikkas complain about EVERYTHING in gaming. Companies try give you new features and because you don't like it you start crying. It's not cheap it's tactical. It's like camo for everywhere and it's not like it's infinite (unless you use the Ghost squad Burn card in TF, but even that resets after death) I've never had a problem with invisibility in gaming but then again they aren't really invisible in the first place.You're lazy
Demonic Jenkins
Pro
that shyt is wack and unbalanced. Turns the game into a foot race for the best weapon instead of it being who's better at aiming/approaching/defending/etc.
Halo did a better job making it less cheap and shallow but gears was fukking terrible with it.
Demonic Jenkins
Pro
I'm not into a gang of perks but load outs and unlocking weapons is way better than that bullshyt race for the best weapon in the game shyt lol.
Cloaking perks are real life. People get crept up on every day.
Demonic Jenkins
Pro
See that "holding down the power weapons" shyt is what I'm talking about...that is so cheap to me. Moth a fukk as just spending the game "guarding" overpowered weapons...it's like weapon camping lol
I can't rock with yall on that one.
I can't rock with yall on that one.