6 wins and 10 losses in the finals are the results you want? How effective is that versatility if it doesn't translate to more wins than losses?
Kobe is amazing as a 2nd option to Shaq, I agree. But put Lebron with a Prime Shaq and do you honestly think he doesn't win 3 rings? Shaq required double and triple teams to stop so Kobe was allowed to destroy on the perimeter. A older, less capable Shaq helped bring a championship to Wade because Shaq required a double and was still pulling down 10 rebounds a game.
Gasol is a legit 7 footer who was grabbing down rebounds and the key to Kobe's success too.
See, this is what I'm talking about. Kobe has explosive scoring games but people forget Lebron is actually more consistent scorer than Kobe is. People really think Lebron in 2009 couldn't easily replicate Kobe's numbers on that Lakers ESPECIALLY if he wasn't the primary focus of the defense because Shaq is roaming the paint?
Kobe had the benefit of having a top 5 player in NBA history at the peak of his ability. Lebron dragged an injured Wade and Bosh to a championship. Wade was getting his knee drained after games and both him and Boah were so injured that they said screw the Olympics and had to get surgery and heal up.
Rings need ****ing context. Pippen has more rings than Kobe but you're high if you think he's a better player because all his rings came as a 2nd option whereas only 3 of Kobe's rings did. Kobe's two rings as a first option matter more than ALL of Pippen's rings combined.
If the Heat beat the Mavericks but Lebron played like crap and Wade got the FMVPS, would that REALLY AFFECT Lebron's legacy. No, he still played like crap but his team saved him.
All Kobe's championships mean is that Kobe has is that he had more talent at round him than Lebron did for half of his rings. It doesn't make him a better player for the same reason Bill Russel isn't a better player than MJ or Kareem despite having more rings than them.
Lebron is more efficient, a comparable scorer, a better passer, a better rebounder, playmaker, perrenial DPOTY candidate, and a more consistent player.
Kobe is a better shooter, more versatile and refined scorer, and has the most insane godmode of any player not named MJ.
Lebron is easier to build around, a more talented player, and has more impact on both sides of the floor due to his ability to morph his play style in myriad of ways.
Kobe is more polished, has unshakeable confidence his ability to make shots, and has a more explosive scoring potential.
I understand exactly how good Kobe is and I'm not biased against him but I'm also able to apply critical thinking to his skills. Kobe is a top ten player, the 2nd best SG of all time, the most skilled scorer of all time (In skills, not effectiveness), and all he really needs to be successful is a great big man, a couple of decent and somewhat consistent shooters to be ring eligible which is absurd.
Lebron isn't as skilled a scorer as Kobe but he's a more compete offensive player due to his insane court vision, great passing abilities, and the fact that he's still an elite scorer plus he's a much smarter at his shot selection. He's not as good at hitting contested shots nor is he as confident on every spot of the court as Kobe but he's such a good slasher that he doesn't need to be as good. He knows his spots and he can almost always get there. He can knock down the jumpers teams are forced to give him with ease.
His post game isn't as versatile as Kobe but he can still back down 90% of the players that guard him and he's dominant enough that he almost always requires a double because he gets into position. Lebron made one of the best perimeter defenders in the league in PG, look like a child when he took him to the post.
And so forth. Lebron is a player who can affect the game in a major way without scoring a single point. If he shoots bad, he's such a good passer and smart player that he can still positively effect the game plus he's still among the most constantly dominant player around.
I'm digressing, I know how good Kobe is. I completely believe that he is a top ten player. I absolutely feel he has a better legacy than Bron right now. I don't feel he's a better player than Bron in the sane way Russel isn't a better player than Jordan despite the hardware.
I'll take all around dominance, versatility, and overall impact over volume scoring. It's the same reason I'd take Wall over Kyrie, Magic and Bird over Kobe, Marc Gasol over Bynum, etc.
Unless you're a transcendent offensive talent (Shaq and MJ), I'm going all around especially when Lebron averages as many points on less attempts despite being a less versatile and polished scorer when he's undeniably better in most other categories.
Most rapes are never reported no matter what race they are.
winning w/o
...TWICE...in a row is the ONLY reason why he is STILL hated...nikkas ego can't take the 
@me having to give drake credit for the sake of argument)