Wikileaks Vault 7 release

[Pressure]

You're a sheep. Stop it you disingenuous fukk.

These companies clearly DONT KNOW about the vulnerabilities or THEY WOULD FIX THEM.

Thats why the burden is on OUR GOVERNMENT to reveal the exploits so these private companies CAN FIX THE EXPLOITS.

Holy fukk. You just said you work for one of these tech companies. Why the fukk are you guys so incompetent?

the only major tech stock I saw down today was AAPL and that was only. 018 percent.

So one your theory that the stocks are dropped or even dropped more than the normal market fluctuations in the day is false.

Secondly, not all tech companies are public.

Third and most important depending on market influence to stop Zero day exploits is maybe the most inefficient security policy ever thought up.

 

[Maschine_Man]

No, Im merely pointing out why the suggestion that wikileaks is doing this as a truth crusade for the people is flawed logic.

do you feel the same about the MSM? or do you feel that they are out to inform the people in a truthful and honest way?

 

[Pressure]

THE ORIVATE SECTOR DOES NOT NOR SHOULD IT WAIT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO FIND THESE EXPLOITS. MANY OF WHICH ARE FOUND BY INDIVIDUALS OR PRIVATE COMPANIES WHO THEN SELL THE EXPLOITS.

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT OUTPACING THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY IN TECH INNOVATION OR SECURITY.

 

[ill]

THE ORIVATE SECTOR DOES NOT NOR SHOULD IT WAIT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO FIND THESE EXPLOITS. MANY OF WHICH ARE FOUND BY INDIVIDUALS OR PRIVATE COMPANIES WHO THEN SELL THE EXPLOITS.

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT OUTPACING THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY IN TECH INNOVATION OR SECURITY.

Who tf said private companies should WAIT for government to exploit their systems? The issue here is the government knows about certain exploits that these private companies don't know about. The government has a CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION to share this knowledge and it neglects to do so. Why tf are such a caping fakkit for big brother.

 

[Pressure]

do you feel the same about the MSM? or do you feel that they are out to inform the people in a truthful and honest way?

If the MSM uncovered this story I'd hold them just as accountable if they say on it and did not disseminate the necessary information to the appropriate companies.

 

[Maschine_Man]

If the MSM uncovered this story I'd hold them just as accountable if they say on it and did not disseminate the necessary information to the appropriate companies.

nah, that was a general question.

your attack on wikileaks was not just in reference to this story. So the question remains.....

 

[Pressure]

Who tf said private companies should WAIT for government to exploit their systems? The issue here is the government knows about certain exploits that these private companies don't know about. The government has a CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION to share this knowledge and it neglects to do so. Why tf are such a caping fakkit for big brother.

No, the government is not contractually obligated to release these exploits.

Why are you making this up?

 

[Pressure]

nah, that was a general question.

your attack on wikileaks was not just in reference to this story. So the question remains.....

It is explicitly related to this story.

 

[Maschine_Man]

It is explicitly related to this story.

soooo you haven't questioned wikileaks other than in this thread or on this subject?

 

[Pressure]

soooo you haven't questioned wikileaks other than in this thread or on this subject?

Wikileaks isn't the MSM. They are ran and founded by a fugitive and if they were a US based company they'd be shut down long ago. Why are you trying to conflate and muddy the water?

 

[Maschine_Man]

Wikileaks isn't the MSM. They are ran and founded by a fugitive and if they were a US based company they'd be shut down long ago. Why are you trying to conflate and muddy the water?

no you are questioning ppl that listen to them(wikileaks) as some honest conveyors of truth.

I am asking you if you think the MSM is more righteous in their commitment to deliver honesty and truth to the public.

 

[Maschine_Man]

Wikileaks isn't the MSM. They are ran and founded by a fugitive and if they were a US based company they'd be shut down long ago. Why are you trying to conflate and muddy the water?

I'm saying, ppl are quick to yell out at wikileaks and say they have an agenda(which I don't doubt that they do have their own agenda)

yet are quick to cop pleas for the MSM and pretend that they don't have their own agenda.

I'll say this.

Wikileaks may have an agenda, but I haven't seen them post anything that was lies. The same can't be said for the MSM.

 

[Pressure]

no you are questioning ppl that listen to them(wikileaks) as some honest conveyors of truth.

I am asking you if you think the MSM is more righteous in their commitment to deliver honesty and truth to the public.

No, the question isn't about the truthfulness of the leaks, but whether in this case is holding these exploits instead of releasing them to the companies more beneficial.

How long have they had this information?
Has it been sold?
Have the released these exploits so companies can address them?

These are all fair questions.

 

[ill]

No, the question isn't about the truthfulness of the leaks, but whether in this case is holding these exploits instead of releasing them to the companies more beneficial.

How long have they had this information?
Has it been sold?
Have the released these exploits so companies can address them?

These are all fair questions.

Yeah, those are fair questions to ask the CIA

 

[Eddy Gordo]

So let me get this straight.
You guys are outraged that the government has the capability to spy on you.
When Snowden told you a few years ago they were spying on you.
And the government literally built a facility to store people's meta data in Utah.
But your mad because wikileaks told you
Breh I'm 23. This has been the U.S all my life. This is the new Americana.Folks traded freedom for security a while ago. I am sorry if y'all late getting the memo. You Better adapt.