Which is why I questioned your motives rather than made a definitive claim on you being "infected". I don't think I should need to spell this out. And yes he did throw a shot at Curry in that post and has been throwing shots at him all season.
And wouldn't consistency dictate that people would defend Curry and the Warriors from the same treatment that squads and players of the past received? I don't even know where you're going with this as it doesn't take away from anything I've said - like somehow having the existence of the detractors needs to exist in order for me to ride for "truth and consistency" like we would even be having this conversation if it didn't.
Yes (we all do), but then again for starters I don't have an agenda (which I know a lot of these posters do) and have watched an extensive amount of games; past and present (which is significant due to people only watching a handful of games of one player and they think they've got it all worked out, or they just follow the common fan path about a team/player), and I can quite confidently say I do challenges my own views and change them regularly too. My opinion on teams/players changes everyday, whereas I still see folk talking about the game and players as they did when they were in grade school. Most can't even entertain the possibility of looking at a player or team differently to their original stance.
Like I said, I questioned you, I didn't make a definitive claim. I don't get what's so hard to understand given the nature of this board. Especially since before you cleared it all up, you replied with this statement -
With what....the "let's cop pleas for Steph/the Warriors we wouldn't tolerate for anyone else" disease.
I'm with you that, but when you're trying to follow reality in the dark as accurately as one possibly can, you end up having to defend eras and players/teams to get your point across, when those teams/players have been denied the credit they actually deserve.