Woj: "Curry is playing at 70%"

HoldThisL

Captain L
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Messages
15,193
Reputation
2,260
Daps
49,589
:youngsabo: is the main reason as to why Curry aint doing so well. Stop with the excuses, everybody has some sort of injury at this point in the playoffs. But Sabo making this nikka tired. Can't pull up and play defense on Sabo.:russ:
 

mr. smoke weed

Smoke Album Done......Wait n See #SmokeSquad
Resting in Peace
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,313
Reputation
3,850
Daps
52,084
Reppin
Chi
I'm still mystified at the anti-Warriors hive mindset on here. It's impossible to have any reasonable discussion regarding them on here.
Are you breh?

It's the coli, any team that starts getting dikk rode to death, their will be lots of non-sensical haters. But rightfully so, look how the media is treating the Warriors.
 

Fani Willis fan

Veteran
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
20,170
Reputation
2,838
Daps
81,583
I knew the fix was in when the announcers randomly mentioned he wasn't looking 100% after a missed layup in game 4...right after they praised him a few plays prior for a dribble and layup finish at the rim :mjlol: Is it oochie wally or is it one mic? :skip:
When Marv Albert started with the "This is not the same Steph Curry, you have to wonder ..."

Foh:bryan:
 

FTBS

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,098
Reputation
3,814
Daps
58,154
Reppin
NULL
Which is why I questioned your motives rather than made a definitive claim on you being "infected". I don't think I should need to spell this out. And yes he did throw a shot at Curry in that post and has been throwing shots at him all season.

And wouldn't consistency dictate that people would defend Curry and the Warriors from the same treatment that squads and players of the past received? I don't even know where you're going with this as it doesn't take away from anything I've said - like somehow having the existence of the detractors needs to exist in order for me to ride for "truth and consistency" like we would even be having this conversation if it didn't.

Yes (we all do), but then again for starters I don't have an agenda (which I know a lot of these posters do) and have watched an extensive amount of games; past and present (which is significant due to people only watching a handful of games of one player and they think they've got it all worked out, or they just follow the common fan path about a team/player), and I can quite confidently say I do challenges my own views and change them regularly too. My opinion on teams/players changes everyday, whereas I still see folk talking about the game and players as they did when they were in grade school. Most can't even entertain the possibility of looking at a player or team differently to their original stance.

Like I said, I questioned you, I didn't make a definitive claim. I don't get what's so hard to understand given the nature of this board. Especially since before you cleared it all up, you replied with this statement - With what....the "let's cop pleas for Steph/the Warriors we wouldn't tolerate for anyone else" disease.

I'm with you that, but when you're trying to follow reality in the dark as accurately as one possibly can, you end up having to defend eras and players/teams to get your point across, when those teams/players have been denied the credit they actually deserve.

:manny:

Yeah I was wrong on that. I overlooked what he said because that wasn't the purpose of me quoting him and it was like 2 words. Still there was nothing questionable about what I said. I look at what people themselves say or do not what a person that they quoted said.

Did you defend all those squads the same way you ride for the Warriors? Maybe I am out of the loop, but I don't recall you ever being lumped in with the Heat or Spurs fans.

If you do indeed challenge your own views then :salute:.

The nature of the board is irrelevant when dealing with an individual. Either you as an individual are on some bullshyt or you aren't and whatever response you receive should be based on that not the overall climate of the board. You questioned me. I assumed it was in jest. I replied with my own remix question in jest. There was nothing to clear up unless you were serious and/or can't handle what you dish out.
 
Top