Lebron is not with the complexities.
He just wants the ball in the middle of the court, drive, kick.
How ignorant of the basketball world do you have to be to believe this.

Lebron is not with the complexities.
He just wants the ball in the middle of the court, drive, kick.
You ain't got any room to talk. The coli been cookin' yo goofy ass all weekHow ignorant of the basketball world do you have to be to believe this.![]()
You ain't got any room to talk. The coli been cookin' yo goofy ass all week![]()
You said Kobe wasn't the best any of the years he played.This is the highest level of basketball discussion you can engage in, as you repeatedly show.
You said Kobe wasn't the best any of the years he played.
What kind of fukkin' knowledge YOU got, BOY?
Don't say another muthafukkin' word to me![]()
TrickWrong. I think Kobe had the best year of anyone in 2008. Better reading comprehension would be your friend.
Don't call me boy.
And as I said before, this as much as can be expected from you.
I think Kobe had the best year of anyone in 2008.
I get what you're saying, but you don't get the MVP for what you've done over a career. You get it for your performance in a specific season.
And Kobe never clearly deserved the MVP in any season. Even in 2008, his MVP could have arguably gone to Chris Paul.
Kobe: 28-6-5 on 46% shooting with 2 steals for a 57-win team
Lebron: 30-8-7 on 48% shooting with 2 steals and 1 block for a 45-win team
Chris Paul: 21-4-12 with 3 steals on 49% shooting (led league in both steals and assists) for a 56-win team
The win difference didn't really accurately show the difference in teams - Lebron looked way better against the Celtics and came much closer to beating them than Kobe did - but Lebron was still penalized for it. And Chris Paul was penalized by the "Kobe needs an MVP before his career is over" factor.
Kobe won MVP in 2008 because it was the closest he had ever come to having an MVP season and everyone wanted to make sure that he had one before it was too late. There wasn't any other year where he had the best case. If a 32-6-5 on 45% shooting Kobe deserved MVP in 2007, then a 30-8-7 on 48% shooting Lebron certainly deserved it in 2008. The problem in both cases was that their team didn't look good enough (Kobe's team won 42 games and Lebron's won 45).
#2 in MVP voting usually means that you played well enough to win an MVP, but someone else happened to have more of a narrative that year. Chris Paul got 28 1st-place votes that year, which was more than Kobe got in ANY season other than 2008, and a lot of people felt that CP3 only finished 2nd because Kobe got career achievement sympathy after not having gotten one for so long.
You think Kobe had the best year yet you juelzed about him only getting MVP because he didn't have one and that CP3 really deserved it, which is a narrative only LeGBT fags and kobe hating media ran with.
It's funny cause if y'all were really trying to win this argument competently, you'd argue for 2008. That's the year he came closest to having an undisputed case - he was the MVP (Chris Paul got a lot of 1st-place votes too, but there was some separation and CP3 only made the 2nd round of the playoffs) and he made the Finals (lost there and Paul Pierce was Finals MVP, but no one really thinks that Pierce was the best player that year). And Bron was dealing with back problems in the 2008 regular season so his #'s and win totals weren't as good as in other years, he had an amazing Game 7 against the Celtics and otherwise it wasn't a memorable year for him. But y'all are reluctant to argue for 2008 alone cause you know it's not a slam dunk. So you're arguing for these "range" of years and missing the actual question in the OP completely.
No way y’all arguing in a thread about the Lakers potential coach![]()