Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
Why can't you tell women the same thing?
"Don't want kids dont let men bust in you" if you do let them, then deal with the repercussions. If they have a way out men should. You know if we're saying men and women are equal
Woman tries to explain why abortion is her right
- Thread starter Calmye
- Start date
Why can't you tell women the same thing?
"Don't want kids dont let men bust in you" if you do let them, then deal with the repercussions. If they have a way out men should. You know if we're saying men and women are equal
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Because of biology bruh
The only people conveniently bringing up this equality stuff is y'all. You want an equal say in this even though you ain't carrying a fetus for 40 weeks? Sorry it ain't gonna happen.
Don't be mad cuz you can't take a plan B
Everythingg
King-Over-Kingz
No it's the women claiming it's their choice that talk about equality. If she can abort responsibilitiy for a child she willingly made then men should be able to abort responsibility to child support. Point blank period
This argument might make sense if men were the carriers of children but such is not the case. Impregnating a woman should be looked at my men as a legally binding contract. once you've inseminated a woman, you've signed a contract that can only be terminated by her choosing to not carry the fetus to term.
I think I’m fine with a woman being able to abort, but I have considered that, perhaps, there should be a a penalty of some sort to consider if the other parent isn’t consulted.
In cases not involving rape, maybe it could be something as simple as having the assumed father co-sign. Otherwise, the mother takes a financial hit by having the abortion cost tripled and/or she getting a probation of some sort.
I don’t know.
In cases not involving rape, maybe it could be something as simple as having the assumed father co-sign. Otherwise, the mother takes a financial hit by having the abortion cost tripled and/or she getting a probation of some sort.
I don’t know.
lets explore this idea further.
What would the goal of the mother paying a financial penalty or having to pay a premium for an abortion in this scenario?
I'm not understanding why we always act like women cant stop themselves from getting pregnant...
Both men and women have say so at the moment of conception... so they should both have say so after
Same ol tired ass argument...
bytch if its ur damn body... close ur fukking legs...
If u want to have the kid and I dnt want it...
I shouldnt be paying for it...
Because its ur body, u should have used birth control, or not let me fukk u raw... or not let me nutt in u.
Women control every aspect of sexual interaction... with that control comes great responsibility...
In real life tho, since women will never be held accountable for their actions....
Stop bussing in these bytches...
bytch if its ur damn body... close ur fukking legs...
If u want to have the kid and I dnt want it...
I shouldnt be paying for it...
Because its ur body, u should have used birth control, or not let me fukk u raw... or not let me nutt in u.
Women control every aspect of sexual interaction... with that control comes great responsibility...
In real life tho, since women will never be held accountable for their actions....
Stop bussing in these bytches...
Low End Derrick
Veteran
these damn bible thumpers are crazy annoying
if they had their way, slavery would still be legal
if they had their way, slavery would still be legal
Same ol tired ass argument...
bytch if its ur damn body... close ur fukking legs...
If u want to have the kid and I dnt want it...
I shouldnt be paying for it...
Because its ur body, u should have used birth control, or not let me fukk u raw... or not let me nutt in u.
Women control every aspect of sexual interaction... with that control comes great responsibility...
In real life tho, since women will never be held accountable for their actions....
Stop bussing in these bytches...
Your solution betrays your argument.
If women controlled every aspect of sexual interaction, there would be no available solutions here. If men don't want the burden of paying for children they don't want, their time to speak is before their sperm enters a woman's body. Beyond that point, it's up to the woman whether or not she wants to take the baby to term as that task is 100% her responsibility after the point of conception.
This is basic stuff here but for some reason many of you struggle with it.
Why would a mans time to speak only be before conception... what limits him?
That's like saying "if a bytch ain't want this dikk, she shoulda said it before I put it in her"....
But women can tell u to stop before sex and during. shyt... she can claim rape way after...
Shes not limited.
And if a women doesnt want the burden of taking care of a child, her time to take control of that was before the baby was conceived
Beyond that point, it's up to God...or whatever legal rights the state affords her
This shyt is too easy bruh
The goal is to encourage mothers to make sure the father of the child is ok with her exterminating their Child.
Why would a mans time to speak only be before conception... what limits him?
That's like saying "if a bytch ain't want this dikk, she shoulda said it before I put it in her"....
But women can tell u to stop before sex and during. shyt... she can claim rape way after...
Shes not limited.
And if a women doesnt want the burden of taking care of a child, her time to take control of that was before the baby was conceived
Beyond that point, it's up to God...or whatever legal rights the state affords her
This shyt is too easy bruh
what limits him beyond the point of conception is the fact that he's planted a seed in someone else's body. If there was some magical way for him to revoke his sperm, then he'd have a say. Suffice it to say, this isn't possible, once a man inseminates a woman, this pre-life form begins to grow inside of her body. She can choose to take it to term and she can also choose to terminate it.
Your argument rests on the assumption that women know at the point of conception whether or not she wants to carry a child to term. Life isn't that simple.
Ok... once u limit his control...
U limit his responsiblity...
She can do all the choosing she wants, once it's in her body and she has all the control over what goes on.....cool...
But now she has to take the same amount of responsibility...
The shyt has to go hand and hand...
Having control
taking responsibilityAnything other than that, then you have people using babies as leverage or killing babies with no conscience
I don't know, man.
I suppose that by requiring the assumed father (or perhaps even a family member) to co-sign in order to avoid a premium or probation, you have a way to frame how serious the situation is to the parties involved. Maybe it even encourages both parties to communicate with their partner more and possibly take more responsibility prior to having sex.
You'll never appease all sides of the argument without being extreme, but it'd be something. What's a body really worth, you know? Put your money where your mouth is. Perhaps, the extra money could be put toward children in the foster system or helping young mothers that are struggling?