It's simple bruh. It takes TWO to make a child. So it should also take TWO to decide whether the child is aborted or not. If that decision only goes to one then the male should also be given an option to totally abort responsibility.
By saying the man is subject to the whims of the woman you are saying they aren't equal. The woman gets to decide whether the child lives or dies and whether the man gets put on child support. While the man gets absolutely no say in anything in a time where women and simp male feminists not much different than yourself are clamoring for "equality". If the woman gets a total opt out than so should the man. That's equality
You're conflating equal with equality and it's lazy. Men can't get pregnant, but women can, where's the "equality" in that? Equality means equal in status, both men and women get to decide what they should do with their own bodies even though men and women aren't equal, hence equality in status while not equal in more obvious areas.
The woman gets to decide what happens to the fetus she alone is carrying in her body, your understanding of equality would have us think that the solution here is for men to start carrying babies to term so both parties are on equal footing.
(If it takes two to make a baby, it should also take two to carry the baby for 9 months

)
Because men cannot become pregnant and bring forth children and women can, the person who can, gets to have the final say on whether or not they choose to bring the life to term.
Men have the option to opt out, or to put it in a better way, they have the option to NOT opt in. Impregnating a woman is opting in, it's effectively signing a contract that can only be broken if the carrier decides to terminate the contract.