Him using the article to disingenuously further his faith also b*stardizes what the article states. So you have a problem with me speaking on what the article is implying, but not him on using it disingenuously? OK.
He takes a pro-Christian stance on every thread ever posted on here, while beingly highly critical of other religions and faiths. He's an incognito Christian who googles pictures of books he didnt read (that also happen to contradict his points) .
How so? How does it discredit Hinduism, jainism, paganism, etc..? Please tell me?
How does it discredit the simulation theory?
If you paid attention to what I wrote, I only said the article makes the case for A LOT of things. I never said anything but.
This is just absurd Creationist nonsense. The fact that you and Dafunkdoc share belief systems explains so much.
1) You accuse of @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited of being Christian when A) first and foremost, that has nothing to do with the point of the article, B) He's not Christian C) How is he using it disingenuously? By telling you you're wrong?

2) No he hasn't taken a pro Christan stance
The funny thing about atheists/evolutionists is that you try to insinuate that Christian = no scientific basis when that is far from the truth, you guys fight so hard to discredit it, it's seems to be almost an obsession at times 
3) The article doesn't discredit any other religion nor the simulation theory. That was my point when I said ID /= Christianity. Reading is fundamental

4) You seem to have a hard-on for Christianity, we've been talking about ID and Deism



