WSJ article:Science Increasingly Makes the Case for God

[blackzeus]

you say that as you fap to what hoyle, davies and lennox said. spare me.

Am I fappin' because it was them who said it, or am I fappin' at the facts in their statements?

Spoiler

Your thought process is all kinds of gay breh, stop talkin' about other dudes fappin'

 

[Regular_P]

I never said we were on the verge of extinction. Silly goofy ass trying to put words in my mouth.. I'm highlighting the sheer amount of deadly forces able to end our lives, and I said how they affected mankind's population, but I never said as of this moment we're at risk. Actually with these stupidass religious ISIS mofukkas we might be.

People are the greatest threat to other people.

 

[Propaganda]

Am I fappin' because it was them who said it, or am I fappin' at the facts in their statements?

Spoiler

Your thought process is all kinds of gay breh, stop talkin' about other dudes fappin'

could i not say the same thing about the refutations? exactly.

at best, your point becomes a stalement. like i said, spare me.

 

[The 2020 New Member]

Its a simple question.

You claim its designed, so what does a lack of design look like?

I will explain after I finish this drawing of nothing.

 

[joeychizzle]

People are the greatest threat to other people.

Especially people with the wrong ideas given extremely broad platforms to spread their ignorance.

 

[blackzeus]

could i not say the same thing about the refutations? exactly.

at best, your point becomes a stalement. like i said, spare me.

ok

 

[blackzeus]

I will explain after I finish this drawing of nothing.

What is nothing? What is a drawing? What does "of" mean? Do the letters o and f exist, and can we determine they form an intelligible word by design?

Spoiler

These nikkaz mane I swear

 

[tmonster]

Yes, the human race is on the verge of extinction.



I think this planet was and everything we use here was not by mistake.

can you answer my question directly? I want to be sure we are on the same page

 

[Regular_P]

can you answer my question directly? I want to be sure we are on the same page

I'm not sure how else you want me to respond.

 

[tmonster]

I'm not sure how else you want me to respond.

I want you to reply yes or no
here is my original question
"Do we agree that your claim or assertion is that perfect things are created by willful beings only, without exception or rarely with exception?"

this is not a trick

 

[Regular_P]

I want you to reply yes or no
here is my original question
"Do we agree that your claim or assertion is that perfect things are created by willful beings only, without exception or rarely with exception?"

this is not a trick

Just state your piece. I'm not getting into a cat and mouse game nor am I condemning anyone's beliefs in here.

 

[tmonster]

Just state your piece. I'm not getting into a cat and mouse game nor am I condemning anyone's beliefs in here.

I asked you if you were game, you said yes. This is the game, if you have changed your mind and don't want to play anymore, then that's cool
peace out

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Because we happen to exist in a perfect space for our needs. What are the odds This perfect planet, with a zillion different species and plants just HAPPENS to exist? It's hard for me to believe it's just blind luck.

Eh, it's really pretty far from perfect, depending on your definition. If you mean "habitable", then I'd say it's just a function of the fact that there's countless planets in the universe. Odds are some of them are going to be able to support life.

We have technology and continue to create new tools to make our lives easier and more enjoyable. Every other species is pretty basic and really, fairly similar. We are insanely unique among every creature on this planet. Humans have proven capable of living in every corner of Earth. Nothing else comes close.

Tardigrades!!

 

[rapbeats]

because this stance doesn't prove anything. It just takes the unknown and says "god exists somewhere in there" without actually proving anything.

actually you're partially wrong here. but lets roll with your theory.
its "god of the gaps"

So what is it when it isnt God... of the gaps? Its "random" of the gaps
So that is a better answer? HA HAAAA. in this article they are pointing out to you that random could have happened but the odds of it being random is so ridiculous to the point where you have to agree that odds are there is some type of creator(s) behind this thing called the universe, called life.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

actually you're partially wrong here. but lets roll with your theory.
its "god of the gaps"

So what is it when it isnt God... of the gaps? Its "random" of the gaps
So that is a better answer? HA HAAAA. in this article they are pointing out to you that random could have happened but the odds of it being random is so ridiculous to the point where you have to agree that odds are there is some type of creator(s) behind this thing called the universe, called life.

This is the entire point.

You can't know whats "random" until you know everything, and the methods they use to assert their "probabilities" aren't determined based on empirical and TOTAL understanding of all the components involved.

You an't just take how many things you know, slap a few fractions around and come up with answers.

Its a perversion of statistics. Take any class on modeling or statistical research.

The flaw is obvious here.