WSJ article:Science Increasingly Makes the Case for God

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,063
Daps
641,697
Reppin
The Deep State
What does a lack of a car look like? lack of hospitality? lack of courage? What is it with you guys and these irrelevant questions? :snoop: What do these red herrings and philosophical panderings have to do with the statistical probability of ID being real?
So how can you say it was designed if you don't know what the lack of design looks like?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,000
Daps
122,429
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
blackzeus said:
The nerve of these nikkaz to call you dishonest when their set of beliefs is a hoax :mjlol:

Been telling these dudes for 3 years what my stance is. They're just angry that NONE of their memes/insults work on me and I know more about the subject than they do.....

james-brown-boogie-o.gif
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
Be mad I know YOUR theological stance better than you do. 'Deistic THINKING' =/= 'deist' anymore than thinking about murder makes one a murderer......

obi-wan-kenobi.jpg


Your logic is flawed and retarded. Use 'The Force' more accurately.​


First, you don't know anything about my beliefs because you can't describe them. A simple search would yield them:

Agnostic here. Closest label to define my stance would probably be something like pantheism. I tend to side with atheists on a lot of issues. I hold an anti-religious position on many topics but ultimately I believe it is someone's right to have faith and be religious as long as it doesn't interfere with secular society in any way, including influencing government policy and conducting mass discrimination.
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/how-many-atheists-do-we-have-here.186813/best-posts


Deists, Pantheists, Pagans and others also have that same answer, without trying to sell you into any garbage.

We already over this: yes, there is something greater, whatever it is. So what makes you think any man, prophet, Imam, book, human language, human concept can understand something beyond our reasoning?

Pantheism is the only logical decision if you believe in a higher power.
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/how-...becoming-in-the-next-20-25-years.40441/page-3


Do you think that a person can automatically grow back a completely lost limb?

Do you think a person who has their brain removed can function completely without the brain?


These seem like limitations of sorts when it comes to "making up your own reality".



I don't know. I'm a pantheist so I have my own non-scientific way of trying to conjure up several scenarios, but I'm not speaking as if I know 100% for sure.

There is a strong possibility where we simply evolved to reflect these rules, not that these rules are meant to limit us by design. A good example of this is hearing. We humans can hear certain frequencies, but we know there exists a large spectrum where we can't hear. A dog or another animal might be able to hear, and some can even communicate at these frequencies.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
Been telling these dudes for 3 years what my stance is. They're just angry that NONE of their memes/insults work on me and I know more about the subject than they do.....

james-brown-boogie-o.gif

You're thekingsmen of Christianity. Your opinion on theological matters hold no weight outside of other Christians on this board. Every thread you come into that is based on Christianity, you take a hard line pro-Christian stance. The fact that you would post something as dumb as this:


There's only one that has been described able to do what has been observed in the Universe thus far.

:unsure:


Is an uneducated response that only serves to push your Christian faith. Nothing else. It doesn't account for a myriad of religions, philosophies, theories, cultures and thousands upon thousands of years of human societies with differing beliefs.

Clown.
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,845
Daps
43,545
it doesn't say anything is unlikely because it doesn't understand what its saying

its an opinion article by someone who doesn't know WTF they're talking about.

Ans since, they know the odds, what does that even mean?

The shyt happened, so that doesn't mean it was impossible.

tumblr_mmcwbufLmC1r5xzspo1_400.jpg
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,845
Daps
43,545
Been telling these dudes for 3 years what my stance is. They're just angry that NONE of their memes/insults work on me and I know more about the subject than they do.....

james-brown-boogie-o.gif


The hilarity of these nikkaz not realizin' what it meant to be an agnostic atheist, then to further add intellectual insult to injury they talk about common descent as if it's a certified fact :mjlol:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,000
Daps
122,429
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Type Username Here said:
You're thekingsmen of Christianity.

:sas1:...........You're the Uncle Ruckus of theism.​

Type Username Here said:
Is an uneducated response that only serves to push your Christian faith.

You're mad that I won't pull out my light-saber to duel you. That sounds rather gay........:sas2:
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
1) Using OP's personal beliefs to discredit the article is a fallacy, argue about what the article states breh, which in regards to the odds of us being here is factually correct.

Him using the article to disingenuously further his faith also b*stardizes what the article states. So you have a problem with me speaking on what the article is implying, but not him on using it disingenuously? OK.

2) @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited is far from a Christian Pastor

He takes a pro-Christian stance on every thread ever posted on here, while beingly highly critical of other religions and faiths. He's an incognito Christian who googles pictures of books he didnt read (that also happen to contradict his points) .

3) What do Christians have to do with the article. An argument for ID/Designer /= argument for Christian God,

How so? How does it discredit Hinduism, jainism, paganism, etc..? Please tell me?

How does it discredit the simulation theory?

but let's say it was for the sake of argument, how does that discredit all the facts in the article?

If you paid attention to what I wrote, I only said the article makes the case for A LOT of things. I never said anything but.

4) Why don't we ever talk about how it's more logical to believe in God than in evolution, it's more statistically more probable that God exists than that evolution is true, that's the irony of atheists/evolutionists, they talk as if they are arguing from some base of scientific knowledge when their dogma is no different than any other religion

This is just absurd Creationist nonsense. The fact that you and Dafunkdoc share belief systems explains so much.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,063
Daps
641,697
Reppin
The Deep State
:snoop: Are you seriously asking how can we decide if something was designed or not? SERIOUSLY? :beli:
I lean to the preponderance of evidence that is reproducible showing how light active proteins can generate inorganic and eventually organic molecules...and you seem to want to think its all "design"

So, show me what non-design looks like.

This is what happens when you make assertions, and overshoot the legitimacy of the fallibility of your argument.
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,400
Daps
32,646
Reppin
humans
:sas1:...........You're the Uncle Ruckus of theism.​



You're mad that I won't pull out my light-saber to duel you. That sounds rather gay........:sas2:


You can hide behind smileys, music videos, and pictures all you want. Why don't you come on a podcast so we can do it where you can't hide behind such petty behavior? You can pick an objective moderator of your choosing.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,000
Daps
122,429
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
blackzeus said:
The hilarity of these nikkaz not realizin' what it meant to be an agnostic atheist, then to further add intellectual insult to injury they talk about common descent as if it's a certified fact :mjlol:

They're trapped inside their own metaphysical presuppositions and can't STAND when their beliefs are critiqued.

What's that saying about people who live in glass houses......:mjpls:?​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,000
Daps
122,429
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Type Username Here said:
You can hide behind smileys, music videos, and pictures all you want. Why don't you come on a podcast so we can do it where you can't hide behind such petty behavior? You can pick an objective moderator of your choosing.

Nah, I prefer bashing you like the bully you are just like this.​
 
Top