wtf... "How Ta-Nehisi Coates Gives Whiteness Power"

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,650
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,111
If you really thought Trump was anti-establishment
:mjlol:

You’re as stupid as his racist deplorable base :russ:
Which candidate received more "establishment" endorsements, donations, and support in the 2016 Presidential election?
 

Eddy Gordo

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,147
Reputation
615
Daps
13,879
lack-of-faith-disturbing.gif


Foresight about what, Trump's degeneracy? I never believed or stated he was some Man of Morals. And I'm far from alone, even on this very website, by being shocked by the sheer dysfunction and ineptitude of this administration. But I never thought this would be some smooth ride, part of what I hoped Trump would do would be to break shyt. Also I find that charge a bit funny as one of the only people here who foresaw the path through which Trump actually won the election, but that's neither here nor there and I'm not sure what this has to do with TNC anymore...

lack-of-faith-disturbing.gif


Foresight about what, Trump's degeneracy? I never believed or stated he was some Man of Morals. And I'm far from alone, even on this very website, by being shocked by the sheer dysfunction and ineptitude of this administration. But I never thought this would be some smooth ride, part of what I hoped Trump would do would be to break shyt. Also I find that charge a bit funny as one of the only people here who foresaw the path through which Trump actually won the election, but that's neither here nor there and I'm not sure what this has to do with TNC anymore...
I believe your lack of foresight in Trump coincides with your views of TNC as well.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,650
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,111
Literally the first question you asked in this thread:
Despite that fact that even before the election, agents of said systemic power endorsed him?

Literally the post you claim to be shifting goalposts:
Which candidate received more "establishment" endorsements, donations, and support in the 2016 Presidential election?

I think you're either genuinely confused or trolling.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,650
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,111
Receiving less establishment endorsements doesn’t necessarily mean you’re antiestablishment, moron :russ:

Child’s logic :mjlol: No wonder you supported Trump
Are you seriously running with the narrative that in the 2016 election, Donald Trump was the establishment candidate? This is the hill you want to die on?
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
42,315
Reputation
9,721
Daps
154,673
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
Literally the first question you asked in this thread:


Literally the post you claim to be shifting goalposts:


I think you're either genuinely confused or trolling.
Exhibit #3485384753845 of why you're a shytTY poster and a dumb fukk

YOU SAID

Elections are contextual, and of the two choices, he wasn't the one who represented the entrenched systemic power I am interested in seeing dismantled.

I SAID

Despite that fact that even before the election, agents of said systemic power endorsed him?
And then you responded with a horsehit filled post about Hillary fukking Clinton

COMPLETELY disregarding the point I made because you're either a stupid fukk (likely) or a troll (also likely) because Paul Ryan, Mitch Turtleface, Ted Cruz, Jeff Sessions, ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and ARE THE ENTRENCHED SYSTEMIC POWER and the DID ENDORSE AND SUPPORT TRUMP

Unless of course, the entrenched systemic power isn't that of the GOP, but then all that would do would certify what we've known about you for months, that you are a Turbo c00n and now that Trump has showed the world who he is, you are embarrassed to admit that you made a shytty choice
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,650
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,111
I believe your lack of foresight in Trump coincides with your views of TNC as well.
If you believe I lack foresight, I don't know what you would call TNC stans who were shocked to the core by the election. But My views on TNC have more to do with my general distrust of white liberalism. I believe in radical emancipatory change, so of course I'm not going to be awed by TNC's milquetoast ruminations written for white liberals.

:yeshrug:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,650
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,111
Exhibit #3485384753845 of why you're a shytTY poster and a dumb fukk

YOU SAID



I SAID


And then you responded with a horsehit filled post about Hillary fukking Clinton

COMPLETELY disregarding the point I made because you're either a stupid fukk (likely) or a troll (also likely) because Paul Ryan, Mitch Turtleface, Ted Cruz, Jeff Sessions, ARE THE ESTABLISHMENT and ARE THE ENTRENCHED SYSTEMIC POWER
ExodusNirvana, my love, do you know what an election is? It's when people and institutions make a choice between candidates they want to represent them and their interests. So if I say that of the candidates, I prefer the one not supported by and representing entrenched systemic powers, and you say that Donald Trump was that candidate endorsed by those agents, it is not "nonsense" or "horseshyt" to provide evidence showing you are incorrect, and that the other candidate was, in fact, more supported by those agents. It is, in fact, necessary context. Do you know why? Because the election was not Donald Trump in a vacuum. It was Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton. It's like if someone was forced to choose between eating shyt or drinking piss, and you choose drinking piss, and then someone asks you why you would drink piss, and then you say you didn't want to each shyt, and then they lose their mind and yell at you asking you why you are even bring up shyt.

Do you understand now?
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
42,315
Reputation
9,721
Daps
154,673
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
ExodusNirvana, my love, do you know what an election is? It's when people and institutions make a choice between candidates they want to represent them and their interests. So if I say that of the candidates, I prefer the one not supported by and representing entrenched systemic powers, and you say that Donald Trump was that candidate endorsed by those agents, it is not "nonsense" or "horseshyt" to provide evidence showing you are incorrect, and that the other candidate was, in fact, more supported by those agents. It is, in fact, necessary context. Do you know why? Because the election was not Donald Trump in a vacuum. It was Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton. It's like if someone was forced to choose between eating shyt or drinking piss, and you choose drinking piss, and then someone asks you why you would drink piss, and then you say you didn't want to each shyt, and then they lose their mind and yell at you asking you why you are even bring up shyt.

Do you understand now?
Get in the fukking coffin
 

ogc163

Superstar
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
9,027
Reputation
2,145
Daps
22,336
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
"It's Going to Be Tough to Explain"

Good interview, at the 32:00 mark Coates finally goes into the cultural vs. structural causes of Black peoples current situation. His answers actually prove McWhorters old criticism of Black scholars right, that the whole notion that dirty laundry shouldn't be spoken about in public was asinine. Especially when it came to academics.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,470
Reputation
132
Daps
15,679
ExodusNirvana, my love, do you know what an election is? It's when people and institutions make a choice between candidates they want to represent them and their interests. So if I say that of the candidates, I prefer the one not supported by and representing entrenched systemic powers, and you say that Donald Trump was that candidate endorsed by those agents, it is not "nonsense" or "horseshyt" to provide evidence showing you are incorrect, and that the other candidate was, in fact, more supported by those agents. It is, in fact, necessary context. Do you know why? Because the election was not Donald Trump in a vacuum. It was Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton. It's like if someone was forced to choose between eating shyt or drinking piss, and you choose drinking piss, and then someone asks you why you would drink piss, and then you say you didn't want to each shyt, and then they lose their mind and yell at you asking you why you are even bring up shyt.

Do you understand now?

You have some pretty valid points...but I think its fair to say you were pretty fukking dumb to think that of ALL the people that can break "the system"....you'd thought it be Trump. :francis:

Hillary may have been the establishment candidate but holy fukk....the shytty medicine is always better than the disease.
 
Top