U should care about sales because sales matter. Ask dreamcast owners or majority of Wi U owners. Low sales can stop production of ur fav console (Sega Saturn)Or developers don't see the point of making games for the console (vita). So yea sales matter big time. Not to say the X1 would meet that fate. It's just not looking great. Even tho the X1 is a hit. Perception trumps reality
Not a big deal since its MSFT. they are literally going to shove the XBOX 1 down peoples throat in order to get that market share.
Windows 10 in every gaming den
-DMP-
Bluray was the right decision though in the PS3. It killed them at the beginning, but it ultimately was the right decision IMO and it showed. We needed a bigger storage medium than DVD.
Gamertag idea came from Steam. Even the service of Live was technically. All Steam and Sega Channel to an extent. MS vision my ass.
Because of them mufukkaz, we had to start paying for online multiplayer and because of their decision to use DVDs in the 360 we got this DLC nonsense started. While Live did bring some good things to the table, paying for online multi when most games are peer to peer is a fukking joke that we are stuck with now. Live by itself should have been a perk of having an Xbox.
If they go down,
Tough break for em, butfor em.
but that's an L 
) They had this planned in the Xbox's inception. SegaNet bombed hard in Japan because a) no one had a Saturn and b) the Dreamcast was an L to the god PS2. 
Steam started in 2003 while Xbox Live started in 2002. XBL came first, and was essentially a pioneer in the universal online infastructure system that DIDN'T go under (Dreamcast, I love you
What was the alternative to Xbox Live at the time of it's inception? Some wack 'online' functionalities that were never fully developed in the entirety of the PS2's life and early in the PS3's life up until PSN? Do you blame them for the price? There was NOTHING like it at the time, of course the competitors wouldn't make the same mistake and all of that easy money floating in the air
DLC was happening way before the 360's inception, as I vividly recall buying DLC for Halo 2 and Ninja Gaiden Black. 360 popularized it, sure, and YES there are some scummy practices regarding DLC but this 'bawwww why don't they sell it as a full game' entitlement bullshyt that's preached by motherfukkers who don't know a GODDAMN thing about game development.
Is your friend @PS4 ?I know I would be pissed if I bought a day one Xbox One. I'm glad I didn't buy one.
One of my friends that I play a few PC games with claims the Xbox One isn't struggling and shyts on anything on the PS4. What's crazy is he pirates games on the PC and later buys the same game on the Xbox One.
Its gotten to the point I don't even talk about video games with the dude. Every time I show him articles with facts and statistics he goes into denial and tries to come up with some stupid excuse as to why the Xbox One will bounce back. It gets old very quick.
It must really hurt to have to admit Microsoft did anything for console gaming. Especially if you wanna compare PSN and it's influences to Sega's online offerings.Bluray was the right decision though in the PS3. It killed them at the beginning, but it ultimately was the right decision IMO and it showed. We needed a bigger storage medium than DVD.
Gamertag idea came from Steam. Even the service of Live was technically. All Steam and Sega Channel to an extent. MS vision my ass.
Because of them mufukkaz, we had to start paying for online multiplayer and because of their decision to use DVDs in the 360 we got this DLC nonsense started. While Live did bring some good things to the table, paying for online multi when most games are peer to peer is a fukking joke that we are stuck with now. Live by itself should have been a perk of having an Xbox.
If they go down,
Tough break for em, but
check your facts again.The Xbox and 360 had a stronger market share in the states than Sony PS
The Xbox got demolished by the PS2. The Xbox 360 outsold the PS3 in the US. The Xbox One is behind the PS4.
