YALL HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED THROUGH SEX

[Somewhere For Me]

I always find it funny that just thousands of years ago on the savannah everyone was fukking everybody, it's only when people started owning things they became obsessed with futile concepts of purity and monogamy

I've always said marriage is nothing more than a business contract...

 

[Somewhere For Me]

Folks ain't gonna want to hear it, but OP spitting some truth.

Our culture and people would be so much better off if they limited the amount of sex they had just by half. So many issues we have like STDs, unplanned pregnancies, broken marriages all have to do cause people so insistent on getting they orgasm and fulfilling their lustful desires.

Now no one saying you have to be a virgin. But is it really wrong and asking to much to have just one sexual partner a year?

Here's what I don't understand...

Why is it always sex people love to attack as causing the ills of the world?

People have been fukking since the dawn of time. I don't understand why nowadays, it's a problem all of the sudden.

 

[Mowgli]

And have degraded yourselves...I am included. There is no wonder why at least half of marriages end in divorce. Save something for your husband/wife. By the time you get married you have been ran through (men&women) and there isn't anything special to you. I give props to all the virgins out here. Clean and pure. Don't fall for the media and your friends. By the time they get married they have emotional scars from past relationships

That's why you get a wife.

My wife be be like

I'm not just a piece of meat.

I have to break it to her gently like

Dont feel bad you are other things besides a piece of meat

 

[Vert1]

 

[Somewhere For Me]

In my opinion...

This whole idea of "purity" and "saving yourself for the one" is nothing more than terms and conditions of a business contract because marriage is a business contract itself.

It's also a power ploy by the ones in charge. People don't realize how much morals, values, and ethics can be used as a power ploy.

I personally think it has caused a complex in people when it comes to sex. A love/hate relationship of sex. We love watching it, having it, and talking about it but, feel guilty/ashamed about it.

That whole purity crap is what causes rape, molestation victims to be shamed (or even killed) and it causes young people to believe something is wrong with them because their natural biological urges are waking up during puberty.

Yeah, you can be a virgin but, still be corrupt and IMPURE because you might be a liar, thief, manipulator, etc;...

I guess the point I'm trying to make is this: There is way more in this world causing problems than consensual sex between consensual adults.

 

[Tenchi Ryu]

Here's what I don't understand...

Why is it always sex people love to attack as causing the ills of the world?

People have been fukking since the dawn of time. I don't understand why nowadays, it's a problem all of the sudden.

We were always fukking, but this sexually free social climate we have now started in the 60s imo (usually referenced as the Sexual Revolution). 30s, 40s and 50s were much more prude about their sexual exploits, and the main ones who were indulging heavily were people with some kind of wealth and power. Prostitutes had chlamydiae real bad, and if a dude was infected, you pretty much snitched on yourself for fukking whores, and no one wanted to be that dude getting clowned for fukking prostitutes.

 

[QuavoFlow]

Only a no-pusssy getting virgin would write something like this.

I aint nothing in this world compared to a chick bending over for you so you can dip your d1ck in some wet wet

really aint nothin like beating cheeks from the back

 

[Somewhere For Me]

We were always fukking, but this sexually free social climate we have now started in the 60s imo (usually referenced as the Sexual Revolution). 30s, 40s and 50s were much more prude about their sexual exploits, and the main ones who were indulging heavily were people with some kind of wealth and power. Prostitutes had chlamydiae real bad, and if a dude was infected, you pretty much snitched on yourself for fukking whores, and no one wanted to be that dude getting clowned for fukking prostitutes.

People were only prudish because of the shame culture that was born out of the heavily religious Victorian era. The Victorian era really pushed the whole idea of purity even to the point of calling make-up a sinful thing.

Far as prostitutes go, it's the oldest profession in the world for a reason and I think at one point in certain societies throughout history it wasn't always shamed either. Not necessarily upheld but, not necessarily shamed; neutral.

I just can't say it was only the wealthy, powerful people. I think the average person from the average family probably has a story or two (or a whole lot) of some old heads who were sexually "free" back in the day as well. Also, didn't the Kinsey report of the forties or fifties show that a lot of regular folk weren't virgin on their wedding nights and had gotten around a bit?

I'm not coming off on the offensive at all. I just enjoy a healthy discussion on things and the subject of human sexuality is quite interesting to me.

 

[Fun Sized Psycho]

And have degraded yourselves...I am included. There is no wonder why at least half of marriages end in divorce. Save something for your husband/wife. By the time you get married you have been ran through (men&women) and there isn't anything special to you. I give props to all the virgins out here. Clean and pure. Don't fall for the media and your friends. By the time they get married they have emotional scars from past relationships

Can someone be considered 'ran through' if they've had 5 sexual partners or less?

Our culture and people would be so much better off if they limited the amount of sex they had just by half. So many issues we have like STDs, unplanned pregnancies, broken marriages all have to do cause people so insistent on getting they orgasm and fulfilling their lustful desires.

The bold can be fixed by people using condoms.

I am in somewhat the same dilemma. My lady is frustrated when she ask to do or try something and I said I already did it or already been there. In terms of sex i tried most things you would consider normal and some extreme. I been most places most people desire to go both domestic and abroad. Only thing left for my lady is arctic whale watching ships, anal fisting and exploring caves.

so because you've already tried it {with someone else}, you can't try it with her?

 

[kaldurahm]

Here's what I don't understand...

Why is it always sex people love to attack as causing the ills of the world?

People have been fukking since the dawn of time. I don't understand why nowadays, it's a problem all of the sudden.

Nobody has stated that sex is responsible for causing the ills of the world, however like everything there's positive and negatives that we shouldn't ignore just cause. Essentially my premise on abstinence has nothing to do with purity and everything to do with practicality. This actually doesn't really entail full abstinence but at the very least being aware of consequences, taking necessary precautions to avoid said consequences, good financial standing etc.. I'm not even waiting till marriage, I'm waiting till I feel that I'm not a child anymore (which I think is dependent wholly on yourself)

I'm not nor do I think op is telling people how to live their lives. Do whatever you do. I will suggest that for your best interest you should be knowledgeable of the possibilities of your actions and act accordingly so.

Also we have to consider the context; life thousands of years ago is very different to that of life now. Nowadays there's a hell a lot more emphasis on economics and the socioeconomic hierarchy is larger than ever, contributing to inequality. This is especially so in the west. As far as it being an issue, I really don't see anyone making a big deal out of it. In fact this is one of the few threads on the coli where the opposite stance is really taken and only arguments based on religion irl. I live in a low income area; and I personally don't see how practicing abstinence or safe smart sex would be a bad idea. But that's just me

 

[Wild self]

I am in somewhat the same dilemma. My lady is frustrated when she ask to do or try something and I said I already did it or already been there. In terms of sex i tried most things you would consider normal and some extreme. I been most places most people desire to go both domestic and abroad. Only thing left for my lady is arctic whale watching ships, anal fisting and exploring caves.

So you fukked bytches in the ass?

 

[skeetsinternal]

Can someone be considered 'ran through' if they've had 5 sexual partners or less?
The bold can be fixed by people using condoms.
so because you've already tried it {with someone else}, you can't try it with her?

She wants to have mutual new experiences

 

[skeetsinternal]

So you fukked bytches in the ass?

Yup...pawgs

 

[Music Fiend]

People would still be curious and not know how to deal with a sexual relationship either, it changes the dynamic. Wife has her first orgasm with another person and shes clingy or she's disappointed and runs to jojo down the block for the real deal?

Marry then smash brehs to find out your wife/husband is asexual and doesn't have your sex drive.

I find a lot of women I've talked to were virgins because they were afraid to get attached and be devastated if things went south. So they opt for saving it for their husband. Much like single women say they are focusing on themselves. Same with men.

Not to mention that saving sex until marriage does not guarantee a lasting relationship. Which is what is overlooked by virgins. the goal of a lasting relationship isn't sex. The goal is intimacy.

 

[Wild self]

Yup...pawgs

Yard man nah fukk batty off fi gyal

Spoiler