GnauzBookOfRhymes
Superstar
President Maricon about to take a massive L
I'm quite certain that the Earth has a finite amount of physical space, finite quantities of most minerals, and generally finite limits to how much pollution its ecosystems can dispose of at several levels.
"The status quo is change" only has any meaning as a slogan. From a technical perspective, is possible to maintain the status quo standard of living without continued economic growth.
Again, sounds good as a slogan but doesn't mean anything. It's just another way for selfish people to deflect from solving problems which require us to adopt higher standards than self-interest. People prove their ability to act beyond self-interest every day.
You mocked the idea of standing up to Big Oil and Big Finance. If you weren't belittling the idea of confronting the powerful, then what were you doing?
"Finite" means "limited in size or extent". You seem to be talking about "temporal" or something. I am referring to the finite physical size/resources of the Earth, and you're talking about its temporal existence for some reason. Not even a clear reason, you're just doing it to argue or something because whether or not the physical body of the Earth outlasts us has absolutely nothing to do with my statement on poorly designed economic systems.Earth predates and will probably outlast our species so whose really finite here ... humans or earth?![]()
The profit motives of the market are heavily driven by the loans-at-interest nature of money creation. It's not basic to human psychology as this level of forced growth wasn't present until the last few hundred years, isn't present at all in many human groupings, and even in our own society can be precluded by a sane money system. But revolving money creation and the assets of the wealthy around loans at interest absolutely guarantees enormous growth motivation across the system which creates an unsustainable reality.It really isn't .. stagnation is death. Once you delve into human psychology
and the profit motives of the market - you'll understand why the assertion
you made is false.
I'm seeing the lethal fault of the system and actually trying to do something about it, rather than just being a cynic.It's not a slogan. You are being ethereal now and deflecting reality for an ideal.
Admirable ? Yes.
Practical ? No
And I always will.I'm not belittling. Comprehension is key. You've seen what these two are capable of both here and abroad
in terms of protecting/furthering their interests.
You want to take that gander... go ahead![]()
This lifestyle of overconsumption needs to change.Its going to take an iron fist to ween us off the tit of oil. Most people aren't capable of looking at the larger picture and are primarily influenced by short term economic gain and comfort. This is part of the reason tackling climate change will be so hard. Raising taxes on fossil fuels is lightweight compared to what really needs to be done. At this point global society essentially needs to come to an abrupt halt if we are to save human civilization.
Preventing catastrophe is going to take a radical reformation on how we live our lives as human beings on this planet.
I wish it was as easy as humanity taking a break from growth for about 50 years or so to allow the ecosystem to recover on its own. And during that time we are developing a sustainable source of energy. Unfortunately its vastly for more complex than this.
"Finite" means "limited in size or extent". You seem to be talking about "temporal" or something. I am referring to the finite physical size/resources of the Earth, and you're talking about its temporal existence for some reason. Not even a clear reason, you're just doing it to argue or something because whether or not the physical body of the Earth outlasts us has absolutely nothing to do with my statement on poorly designed economic systems.
The profit motives of the market are heavily driven by the loans-at-interest nature of money creation. It's not basic to human psychology as this level of forced growth wasn't present until the last few hundred years, isn't present at all in many human groupings, and even in our own society can be precluded by a sane money system. But revolving money creation and the assets of the wealthy around loans at interest absolutely guarantees enormous growth motivation across the system which creates an unsustainable reality.
I'm seeing the lethal fault of the system and actually trying to do something about it, rather than just being a cynic.
It's not idealistic to search for a solution when the alternative is catastrophe.
And I always will.
The Earth is finite in size and extent.I didn't seem or infer ...
Answer the question...
What's really finite here ... humans or earth?
Yes, in just a few hundred years we've seen a remarkable collapse in fisheries, forestries, watersheds, and the carbon cycle. Approximately 50% of the Earth's land area is being utilized for human development. Topsoil is being devastated in both quantity and quality, food output is dropping in nutritional value and becoming more and more susceptible to disease and pests even before the loss in volume productivity. As the collapse point is going to happen well before we reach 100% (as human civilization relies significantly on the processes undertaken in a lot of that undeveloped land area), our progress line towards the breaking point is obvious.An unsustainable reality for the last few hundred years ?![]()
Lethal to the maintenance of society as is currently expected. Exactly how the fallout will occur will remain to be seen, but it would be expected as in the vast majority of instances that the poor and the marginalized will feel the consequences far greater than the wealthy and powerful, who will see their current lives severely impinged but will use their power to make whatever outs are possible for themselves.Lethal to who exactly ? and what steps are you taking towards this goal ?
You can chek out live here if it works for you US brehs :
Didn’t load for me. shyt is wild tho, I know it’s an issue with the increase in diesel costs but what brought things to this point? iirc Macron wasn’t the populist sensation that Le Pen was nor a progressive Bernie like sensation but a banking sector choice. Which side is winning out in France now?![]()
Damn...anyway yeah images are quite crazy, tear gas everywhere, I think it's been going since 10am. Tension seems to have escalated due to security forces more so than from the Gilets Jaunes. Although due to the nature of the "movement" (which isn't centralized, even 8 "representatives" have emerged), it's bound to happen that some more violent people join the demonstrations.
Yeah diesel costs sparked it but it's a long series of unpopular decisions hitting modest classes that brought it to this level of exasperation. Movement is getting a lot of support from what I see, from all kinds of different people, which makes it kind of difficult to fully understand. But the root of the issue, I believe, is an overall increase in cost of living, tax cuts for the rich, etc...and a general feeling of disconnect between Macron and the country. There was a thread made after last week's demonstration too with more answers in it.
True, I need to find that thread and play catch up. Al Jazeera has been hilarious, they got a reporter in the heart of the protest them French brehs all in the video fukkin up the report on some Diddy shyt. Y’all are very clearly pissed off right now.