You run a shop and someone steals $100

[MeachTheMonster]

Dude paid for it but it was with the owners money.

There is no profit. Y'all nikkaz don't even understand why Biggie said "don't get high on your own supply".

No one said anything about the owner making profit. He lost $100

 

[BocaRear]

Dude paid for it but it was with the owners money.

There is no profit. Y'all nikkaz don't even understand why Biggie said "don't get high on your own supply".

Forreal these nikkas think paying for something you already own makes you a profit

 

[Zach Lowe]

you don't steal money, then pay for shyt with the money, AND GET TO KEEP THE MONEY YOU PAID WITH

@Coli retards

 

[SteelCitySoldier]

you fukking tard

yeah he gets $100 out of the shop, then $60 of goods and $40 out of the shop

BUT IN BETWEEN HE COMES BACK AND PAYS FOR THE GOODS WITH $100

so at the beginning and end, the amount lost/stolen is only $100

you don't steal money, then pay for shyt with the money, AND GET TO KEEP THE MONEY YOU PAID WITH

Smh. The goods are paid for with funds that we're stolen FROM THE SAME PLACE Lol. Owner gets nothing...it's all loss. He basically bought something from himself

 

[Zach Lowe]

Smh. The goods are paid for with funds that we're stolen FROM THE SAME PLACE Lol. Owner gets nothing...it's all loss. He basically bought something from himself

No one's saying the owner makes money

we're saying the owner loses -100 whether the thief comes back to buy shyt or not

if he doesn't come back then you're down 100

if he comes back to buy shyt, then he's paying you with the $100 he stole
(-100+100 = 0)

and then he gets whatever shyt he bought, plus the change back (total of shyt he buys + change is 100)
(-100+100-100 = -100)

so the owner's at -100

 

[BocaRear]

@Coli retards

We're talking about how much money was LOST not how much the thief gained ,

The thief walks away with $40 cash and $60 worth of good,

BUT the shopkeeper has lost his $100

AND approx $60 worth of goods due to the fact he made no profit on it because he paid for the goods Twice with the $100 the thief stole from him

 

[zerozero]

No breh. The owner made nothing in the entire transaction because it was money spent that was his money already.

Dude stole money and purchased something that the owner had to purchase with his own money. Owner makes nothing because the transaction was all in house money.

Sure it's a scam, but you're double counting.

If Joey took $50 from a McDonalds register and then bought $50 worth of food, McDonalds is not out $100.

McDonalds lost $50. The cash exchanged for food was a fair transaction.

 

[Reality]

100 he stole plus the 40 he got back in change. If the money was spent outside the shop it would be different

Breh he paid $100 for the $60 item. He still gave up $100 in cash and got $40 back. There's no way he can have $140 in cash.

 

[Zach Lowe]

We're talking about how much money was LOST not how much the thief gained ,

The thief walks away with $40 cash and $60 worth of good,

BUT the shopkeeper has lost his $100

AND approx $60 worth of goods due to the fact he made no profit on it because he paid for the goods Twice with the $100 the thief stole from him

the shopkeeper gets his original $100 back cuz the thief pays with it

why the fukk else would he give away $60 in product and $40 cash? is it for free?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

We're talking about how much money was LOST not how much the thief gained ,

The thief walks away with $40 cash and $60 worth of good,

BUT the shopkeeper has lost his $100

AND approx $60 worth of goods due to the fact he made no profit on it because he paid for the goods Twice with the $100 the thief stole from him

fukk you're stupid.

Let's say the thief spends the money elsewhere. Then walks in with his own $100 bill.

How much does the owner lose then?

 

[Reality]

Sure it's a scam, but you're double counting.

If Joey took $50 from a McDonalds register and then bought $50 worth of food, McDonalds is not out $100.

McDonalds lost $50. The cash exchanged for food was a fair transaction.

It's really this fukking simple. I'm at the responses in here.

 

[Zach Lowe]

i put the right answer with full details on first page

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/15980467/

get my daps up brehs so we don't get retards believing @TheRealfG is right

 

[25YOUTHS!!]

Assuming the merchandise is 100% profit:
You lost $100 total.
$60 in merchandise and $40 cash

 

[Cantwait]

the shopkeeper gets his original $100 back cuz the thief pays with it

why the fukk else would he give away $60 in product and $40 cash? is it for free?

fukk you're stupid.

Let's say the thief spends the money elsewhere. Then walks in with his own $100 bill.

How much does the owner lose then?

Brehs give it up. Aint no point trying with these idiots. Arguing with a fool is like playing chess with a pigeon. It's gonna shyt on the board and strut around like it won anyway

 

[valet]

Didnt read no one answer. $100. He stole $100. Gave back $60. ,then stole it again. Plus. Gave back 40