Bro that shyt was insane. If he misses just one of those in regulation the Knicks win.Aaron Nesmith was 8/9 from 3 and had 30 pts
![]()
Bro that shyt was insane. If he misses just one of those in regulation the Knicks win.Aaron Nesmith was 8/9 from 3 and had 30 pts
![]()
Hailburton really is a heelBrunson does that shyt too. Make sure to add that thin haired nikka to the list.
Bro that shyt was insane. If he misses just one of those in regulation the Knicks win.
That nikka might have goat level cardio. Chased Brunson all night and was still getting 3s off with plenty lift.Aaron Nesmith was 8/9 from 3 and had 30 pts
![]()
Indy's passing is too good for the zone imo. They'd pick that apart. You need to switch or if you're gonna have players stay at home, they have to hedge at the level of the screen. KAT was in constant drop coverage and OG got caught in the same drop coverage. That's especially bad when you're protecting a big lead late.
The biggest benefit of letting Boston pick out mismatches was that they kept leaving OG and Bridges on lesser threats. That meant one of the two was always in position to be the weakside help, and they ate up the passing lanes. I was excited to see how that'd work against a pass-heavy offense like Indy but we never got the chance.
One disclaimer though: I'd have everyone going under or in drop coverage when TJ Mcconnell is on the rock. I'd rather let him take loosely contested pull-up jumpers than have him driving past players that went over screens.
Nah, the Celtics did not attack Brunson and KAT in pick and pop at all. They tried to get Brunson/KAT into switches onto Tatum or Brown, not the bigs. Then they attacked KAT with face up offense or Brunson with post-ups from the bigger guys (which honestly failed more than it worked).You're making my point though. Switching defenses are actually terrible for pick and pops. Celtics' gameplan to attack the Knicks switching was to attack KAT and Brunson (Because they are terrible help defenders) in pick and pop for a 3 pointer with Porzingis or Horford. Both of the Celtics' bigs were shooting terrible, it messed up the spacing, so the Knicks were able to make the Celtics shoot inside the arc. On top of that, because of the bad shooting, the Knicks were able to clog the paint
Can't do that with the Pacers because they attacked Brunson and KAT way more effectively than the Celtics did. The reason Nesmith got free with the Knicks fighting over screens is because Knicks were terrified of KAT or Brunson being abused in the pick and roll so they had to fight to go over screens
He never stops!That nikka might have goat level cardio. Chased Brunson all night and was still getting 3s off with plenty lift.
I completely agree. KAT shouldn't be afraid of Turner flying by him. The constant drop coverage drove me crazy. When they slipped back into drop coverage against Boston (game 5), they got blown out.I don't think drop coverage is necessary if Turner is the one in the middle of the floor with the ball...he shouldn't be able to blow by KAT. Drop coverage can be used against TJ and make him take slightly longer than ft range jumpers & trust the recovery & contest.
nahAlso lowkey….OG & Towns can go. If you can get Giannis for them, do it.
It was an awful loss to be sure, but you can't think Nesmith is gonna shoot 90% from three and score 30 points in a game again.On the real if I am the Knicks I am worried. They shot lights out from 3 and still managed to lose the game. Their defense was underwhelming. Pacers ability to spread that ball is almost Spurs like![]()
That's not to mention how they missed 12 free throws...2 in the last 14 seconds.Bro that shyt was insane. If he misses just one of those in regulation the Knicks win.