YouTube to Remove Thousands of Videos Pushing Extreme Views

[newworldafro]

Also, since this is TLR, I'd like to preface this thread by saying this:

If you're worried that your favorite YouTubers might get touched ( ) if they're purging anti-semitic, neo-Nazi, misogynist content, what does that say about the kinds of videos you watch?

In case you ain't get the memo....they banned Farrakhan for what they deem "hate speech".

There are plenty of other black pundits that walk the line between what could be deemed racist/supremacist and cultural pride. There also plenty of black pundits that aren't hateful about LGBTQ, but will not be silent on certain movements they see as questionable....that itself according to our tech overlords could be devised as "hate speech".

It's really whatever tech overlords are told by these non-profits determine is "hate speech".

It's actually interesting to see what they will allow, when it would be deemed disgusting behavior not to long ago....

 

[Black Panther]

1.That isnt a full list

How do you know this? :bpthink:

Is there a "secret" list that only you are privy to? :bpohh:

 

[Apollo Creed]

How do you know this? :bpthink:

Is there a "secret" list that only you are privy to? :bpohh:

English 101. The quote said the list INCLUDES not THE LIST IS.

 

[Black Panther]

In case you ain't get the memo....they banned Farrakhan for what they deem "hate speech".

I'm not a fan of Farrakhan, and I'm not sympathetic to his views just because he's Black.

 

[Black Panther]

There are plenty of other black pundits that walk the line between what could be deemed racist/supremacist and cultural pride. There also plenty of black pundits that aren't hateful about LGBTQ, but will not be silent on certain movements they see as questionable....that itself according to our tech overlords could be devised S "hate speech".

It's really whatever tech overlord are told by these non-profits determine is "hate speech".

Then those Black pundits need to hold this L. :kanyebp:

F*ck extremists. :kanyebp:

EDIT: Also...

In before ranty word-salad about how this is bad for alternative news media and independent black news voices...somehow

Honestly, if you're worried that your favorite YouTubers might get touched ( ) if anti-semitic, neo-Nazi, misogynist content is being purged, that says a lot about the kinds of videos you watch.

Right on cue.

 

[newworldafro]

I'm not a fan of Farrakhan, and I'm not sympathetic to his views just because he's Black.

Well that's fine.....glad you keeping it honest, but as I said even people who agree with Farrakhan and say some similar things that you do like...could easily be censored, based on whatever ambiguous criteria they come up with .

They'll never ban people that actually lie us into wars resulting in the deaths of millions, millions injured, millions psychologically damaged, trillions in taxpayer dollars, and destroyed infrastructure and cities....never get banned.....

 

[ORDER_66]

I'm concerned that this will offer them cover to remove videos from the likes of Professor Black Truth and other pro-black intellectuals whose content consists of deconstructing the common lies of white supremacy.

Yep, the pro black youtubers will be the first to go...

 

[feelosofer]

I feel like this could be a very slippery slope.

 

[Apollo Creed]

Well that's fine.....glad you keeping it honest, but as I said even people who agree with Farrakhan and say some similar things that you do like...could easily be censored, based on whatever ambiguous criteria they come up with .

They'll never ban people that actually lie us into wars resulting in the deaths of millions, millions injured, millions psychologically damaged, trillions in taxpayer dollars, and destroyed infrastructure and cities....never get banned.....

With his logic he’d be fine with the coli censoring all his posts because he has the word “black” in his screen name

 

[Black Panther]

English 101. The quote said the list INCLUDES not THE LIST IS.

That's true, but we can't make assumptions about info we don't have. :kanyebp:

 

[Black Panther]

With his logic he’d be fine with the coli censoring all his posts because he has the word “black” in his screen name

I'm not a Chicken Little. Sorry breh. :kanyebp:

 

[newworldafro]

With his logic he’d be fine with the coli censoring all his posts because he has the word “black” in his screen name

Indeed.

 

[JuvenileHell]

good riddance

 

[Black Panther]

Well that's fine.....glad you keeping it honest, but as I said even people who agree with Farrakhan and say some similar things that you do like...could easily be censored, based on whatever ambiguous criteria they come up with .

So the solution is, what...the status quo?

Do nothing?

"Engage with their arguments", or whatever that means?

Yeah, f*ck that. Get those Neo-Nazis the f*ck up outta here. :cambybp:

More harm is being done waiting on some godlike, benevolent Black YouTuber to come forth and destroy all the white supremacists. :denzelcmonson:

 

[loyola llothta]

You didn't read the article, then. Yeah, it can be subjective, but they laid out, in clear terms, what they define as "extreme":

nikka is you slow?