Spartiates
Zulus are overrated

Spartiates
Zulus are overrated
Wonder how those animated battle models would show the outcome of a battle..
spartans, zulu weaponary was far inferior
if you google each weapon sets you will see a big differance. also spartans were real killers. alot of zulu conflict was symbolic. they would be overwhelmedHow? Zulus, like other Bantus, used iron weapons.
if you google each weapon sets you will see a big differance. also spartans were real killers. alot of zulu conflict was symbolic. they would be overwhelmed
Imo the zulu spears are top tier but the cowhide shields are lacking and the one handed axe is good but not great. Ill give them tactics and manpower along with physical composition but their not my favorite ancient african army. I seen some dahomey and akan blades in a museum that had mejoints looked like final fantasy swords
10'000 spartans
10'000 Zulus
Location: south Africa
the Spartans roll up 10k deep lookin for smoke
Also people not taking into account Calvary and Artillery. Zulu might be better 1 on 1 fighters and will give them trouble fighting guerilla warfare but Zulu wouldn’t even get close to them with the Archers and Greek Phalanx .Terrain being even, numbers being even...
shyt... even if the Spartans are outnumbered. Spartans win easily 10 out of 10 times.
I think people in this Thread are really undervaluing the importance of armor. Zulus have cowhide shields for protection and what else? Spartans have bronze cuirasses, bronze helmets, thick shields coated in bronze, and bronze arm/leg greaves.
It’s the reason why during the 1st Crusades the Christians were having so much success against the lightly armoured Muslims even though they were outnumbered in a lot of battles 2 to 1.