A big NBA money crunch is coming

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
68,559
Reputation
8,017
Daps
207,897
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Maybe the Players Association should have opted for cap smoothing rather than all of the cap space at once? :jbhmm:

A major NBA financial crunch is coming
upload_2018-2-5_11-17-40.png

Trail Blazers starting center Jusuf Nurkic makes one-third the salary of his backup, Meyers Leonard, and could have a hard time finding similar money in restricted free agency. AP Photo/Craig Mitchelldyer

7:30 AM ET

By Fat Elephant Cac and Bobby Marks

In July 2016, the Portland Trail Blazers signed restricted free agent Meyers Leonard, their backup center, to a four-year, $41 million contract. It was at the tail end of a surge of large contracts given out that summer, the greatest time in NBA history to be a free agent.

This summer, the Blazers' starting center, Jusuf Nurkic, will be a restricted free agent. He might find it hard to draw an offer from an outside team larger than what his backup is being paid.

In the 2015-16 season, the Boston Celtics assembled an impressive 48-34 season behind the play of a collection of gritty perimeter players. Two of them were Evan Turner and Marcus Smart. Turner was a bit more effective as an offensive creator, Smart more of a defensive grinder. But they played similar minutes and offered similar stats.

Turner, who had the fortune of being an unrestricted free agent that summer, got a $17.5 million per season deal from the Blazers. This summer, Smart, who will be a restricted free agent, might face an environment in which role players could struggle to field outside offers above the $8.8 million midlevel exception, according to multiple league executives.

Smart and Nurkic aren't alone. It's always hard to be a restricted free agent but even unrestricted free agents this summer - players like Avery Bradley, Isaiah Thomas, DeAndre Jordan, Lou Williams and Will Barton - will likely find things dramatically different than just a couple years ago when teams handed out a billion dollars in just 24 hours.

These situations illustrate a fast-changing NBA economic climate that is already showing up as teams dig into trade deadline maneuvers. The bull market that surged in the league in 2016 and 2017 is giving way to a bear market. The league is about to face a cash crunch.

"The trade market is mostly sellers right now," one general manager said. "There's only a few buyers. Looking at everyone's books, I don't think that's going to change much this summer."

Here are a few numbers to explain
Currently, there are five teams slated to pay the luxury tax this season, which means those teams are spending more than $119 million on payroll. Last season, there were two such teams. In the 2015-16 season, there were seven. That's a total of 14 teams over a three-year span.

That was about the same as the previous three-year span: From 2012-13 to 2014-2015, a total of 16 teams paid the tax. Average it out, and roughly five teams per season have been willing to pay the penalty since 2012, which is relevant because that season is when a more penal luxury tax was introduced.

Next season, 12 teams are currently projected to be in luxury tax territory, and another handful could easily get there by re-signing their key free agents. For example, the Milwaukee Bucks aren't currently projected to be in the tax but would cross into the zone if they re-sign free-agent-to-be Jabari Parker.

"Add it all up, and it's a bad year to be a free agent -- or a team looking to reduce salary."

"The luxury tax was not designed for this many teams to pay it," a league executive said. "Many of those owners probably didn't think they'd be paying it. Quite a few of those teams are probably going to take steps to get out of the tax or limit new spending."

This season, teams are paying players a collective $3.13 billion in salaries. But after large jumps in the salary cap the past few years -- from $63 million in 2014-15 to $99 million this season -- the cap is projected only to increase to $101 million next season.

That's $60 million in money added to the cap. That sounds like a lot, but NBA teams already have $3.02 billion committed to players under contract next season. About 18 months ago, the NBA told its teams that the projected the cap for the 2018-19 season was going to be $107 million.

"Picture the spending on salaries as a large tank of water," one GM said. "The last several years, the tank has been getting bigger, and so we've been filling it with more water. But this year the tank is staying about the same size. There's no place for the water to go. There's only so much the owners are going to spend when you have a luxury tax out there."

The players are guaranteed 51 percent of the NBA's basketball-related income each season, so they are guaranteed to get a certain amount of "water," to use that analogy. However, most of that percentage appears to be tied up in players already under contract, so there won't be as much "new" money to go around.

Chicago Bulls, might sit out of the free-agent market and instead look for trades. The Bulls already demonstrated their intentions by taking on Omer Asik and the $19 million remaining on contract in return for getting a first-round pick from the New Orleans Pelicans.

Other teams with coming cap space who aren't ready to contend immediately - like the Atlanta Hawks and Phoenix Suns - may be more judicious with their money instead of making big offers to free agents like nearly every team was doing just two years ago. Instead, they may look for trade opportunities and it could depress the free agent market further.

"There are going to be a lot of teams who are looking to move money," a general manager said. "And there aren't many places for it to go. So it will be hard to offload salary, and if you want to, the teams with space will probably charge high prices to take money from your books."

All these factors have executives expecting the midlevel exception to be the primary option for many teams looking to add players. But with half the league in the tax or in danger of going into the tax, many teams won't spend the full $8.8 million and instead will opt for the "taxpayer midlevel" of $5.4 million.

Add it all up, and it's a bad year to be a free agent -- or a team looking to reduce salary.

When will the situation improve?
"Is it going to be a little bit of a tough period? Yes, but we'll wake up in the summer of 2019 and 2020, when those contracts that were signed in 2016 come off the books, and there will be a lot of money again," longtime NBA agent Mark Bartelstein said.

"I've seen much worse. The cap was trapped between $50 and $60 million for [eight] years. Now the cap is at $100 million, and there's still only 15 players on a team. Things are always changing in the NBA because it's so fluid. Players will understand the risk and reward. NBA free agency is always a competitive marketplace."
 

WMG the 2nd

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
13,745
Reputation
2,940
Daps
60,151
The players fukked them self over
Luol deng won and a lot of these guys who are good players who would have made 50 plus million two off seasons ago will be looking for modest contracts for the next season. It’s going to be nikkas signing with the suns simply because they have money to pay players
 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,687
Reputation
1,090
Daps
34,281
The players fukked them self over
Luol deng won and a lot of these guys who are good players who would have made 50 plus million two off seasons ago will be looking for modest contracts for the next season. It’s going to be nikkas signing with the suns simply because they have money to pay players

The wrong players won. Sounds harsh, but guys like Ian, Deng, Noah, etc got paid during the jump and hardly deserved that money. Now guys playing great won't earn shyt because GMs apparently have no foresight.
 

trick

sleeping
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
23,880
Reputation
5,481
Daps
73,219
The players fukked them self over
Luol deng won and a lot of these guys who are good players who would have made 50 plus million two off seasons ago will be looking for modest contracts for the next season. It’s going to be nikkas signing with the suns simply because they have money to pay players

Only seven teams have cap space over $10 mil this summer :picard:

Teams With $10M+ Cap Space
Atlanta Hawks $21 million
Brooklyn Nets $15 million
Chicago Bulls $24 million
Dallas Mavericks $20 million
Los Angeles Lakers $35 million
Philadelphia 76ers $30 million
Phoenix Suns $17 million
 

Houston911

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,487
Reputation
13,574
Daps
196,087
EVERYONE WITH COMMON SENSE
KNEW IT WAS DUMB TO GIVE ALL THOSE BUMS
THOSE BIG DEALS.

ONLY THE IDIOTS WERE TALKING ABOUT
ITS A GOOD DEAL BECAUSE THE CAP GOING UP.
:devil:
:evil:


Lots of clowns on the coli told me that giving guys like mozgov 16 mil or Chandler Parsons 25 mil wouldn't have long term implications

:mjlol:

This is one of the reasons why i didn't like jimmy butler trade for Minny

They could have had about 50 mil in cap space before resigning wiggins/lavine if they dumped Rubio and Deng and used cap holds

Towns+Wiggins+lavine+Dunn+Dennis Smith or markannen plus 50 mil in a market where nobody has cap space
 

boskey

Top Rankin
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,958
Reputation
3,555
Daps
61,457
Ya'll are calling people dumb but what exactly is the "problem" here? A lot of people got paid last year and there is less money available now? So what?
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,595
Reputation
8,412
Daps
194,954
Reppin
Uptown and the Bronx
Lots of clowns on the coli told me that giving guys like mozgov 16 mil or Chandler Parsons 25 mil wouldn't have long term implications

:mjlol:

This is one of the reasons why i didn't like jimmy butler trade for Minny

They could have had about 50 mil in cap space before resigning wiggins/lavine if they dumped Rubio and Deng and used cap holds

Towns+Wiggins+lavine+Dunn+Dennis Smith or markannen plus 50 mil in a market where nobody has cap space
Nothing you said made sense

Learn what a cap hold is before you say this.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
49,117
Reputation
11,140
Daps
345,464
Reppin
CHICAGO
Lots of clowns on the coli told me that giving guys like mozgov 16 mil or Chandler Parsons 25 mil wouldn't have long term implications

:mjlol:

This is one of the reasons why i didn't like jimmy butler trade for Minny

They could have had about 50 mil in cap space before resigning wiggins/lavine if they dumped Rubio and Deng and used cap holds

Towns+Wiggins+lavine+Dunn+Dennis Smith or markannen plus 50 mil in a market where nobody has cap space

ITS MINNY THOUGH...
THEY STILL WOULDNT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SIGN THE TOP GUYS WITH THAT SPACE.

THE ONLY WAY THEY WERE GETTING A TOP 10 PLAYER
WAS THROUGH A TRADE JUST LIKE THEY DID.

THEY MAXED OUT WIGGS
AND WOULD HAVE MAXED OUT LAVINE.
:devil:
:evil:

 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,687
Reputation
1,090
Daps
34,281
Lots of clowns on the coli told me that giving guys like mozgov 16 mil or Chandler Parsons 25 mil wouldn't have long term implications

:mjlol:

This is one of the reasons why i didn't like jimmy butler trade for Minny

They could have had about 50 mil in cap space before resigning wiggins/lavine if they dumped Rubio and Deng and used cap holds

Towns+Wiggins+lavine+Dunn+Dennis Smith or markannen plus 50 mil in a market where nobody has cap space

Provided a receipt and I'll neg them. fukk that summer.
 
Top