Facts!!!!Sony owns 5% of epic games.
Sony out here co-publishing greatness
Circana (NPD) US sales December 2023 - PS5 (#1 for both) NSW (#2 for both) XBS #3 / MW3#1, Mario Wonder#2, Madden 24#3
- Thread starter Gizmo_Duck
- Start date
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Sony owns 5% of epic games.
Sony out here co-publishing greatness
And 14% Fromsoftware so even more publishing on the charts
That it's harder to actually sell something than it is to rent something.Spider-man is a very popular character.
I’m not sure what you are expecting me to say here
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
This isn’t true
again the number one most profitable and played game this year has zero sales.
Y’all gotta reconcile that fact before you keep quoting me
And don't forget Sony out here co-publishing the only Marvel movie that has even mattered in the last 3 or 4 years as wellAnd despite all of it meach still bought a ps5 and same-nikka 2
Back to my original point. It’s easier to get someone to “try” a F2P game than it is with a full priced game.This isn’t true
again the number one most profitable and played game this year has zero sales.
Y’all gotta reconcile that fact before you keep quoting me
WHAT!?This isn’t true
again the number one most profitable and played game this year has zero sales.
Y’all gotta reconcile that fact before you keep quoting me
Is your contention that it's harder to give away a game than it is to sell a game?
I said "it's harder to actually sell something than it is to rent something."
Your response makes 0.0% sense.
Meach, squeeze both of my fingers
I need to make sure you haven't had a stroke.
CEO of Morgan Industries
Superstar
So is the line of logic here that since the most profitable game is F2P with in-game sales that all games should be F2P with loads of microtransitions to keep the industry healthy, then?
All games moving forward should be low budget, high profit, subscription based, have microtransactions, and be published by one of microsoft's subsidiaries.So is the line of logic here that since the most profitable game is F2P with in-game sales that all games should be F2P with loads of microtransitions to keep the industry healthy, then?
The overall quality of the game itself is a straw man argument.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
All games moving forward should be low budget, high profit, subscription based, have microtransactions, and be published by one of microsoft's subsidiaries.
The overall quality of the game itself is a straw man argument.
Meach gonna be at the microsoft casino like “sony stans
“
Meach gonna be at the microsoft casino like “sony stans
But is Sony matching 401K contributions up to SIX POINT FIVE percent!?!?!? I bet they aren't are they!!!???
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
WHAT!?
Is your contention that it's harder to give away a game than it is to sell a game?
My contention is that people play the games they want to play regardless of price.
There’s dozens of FTP games and $70 games releasing all the time. None of them reach the heights of fortnight or spider-man
Sure, I agree, but the numbers in the OP don’t give you this answer
Success exists on the other side of haters.Meach, squeeze both of my fingers
I need to make sure you haven't had a stroke.
Maybe you are just on the wrong side
Again, you are in an industry sales thread.All games moving forward should be low budget, high profit, subscription based, have microtransactions, and be published by one of microsoft's subsidiaries.
The overall quality of the game itself is a straw man argument.
If you wanna talk about the quality of an individual piece of software make a thread
Similar threads
