Even if we agree this is true, it's because Hillary has had more political power. The only reason there isn't more to critique Trump on is because he hasn't held office. Had he been an elected official in the 90's, do you really think he would be the one advocating for the rights of minorities accused of crimes? Let's keep things in perspective here.
But the main reason why I'm a fukk-Trump guy is I don't think we can have someone so petty and insecure as him with his hand on the nuclear button and leader of the US military. Don't get me wrong, Hillary is a bit hawkish for my tastes too, but Trump takes every little thing as a slight. Would be openly insulting world leaders via Twitter ... debating whether or not their hands are as big and manly as his. Diplomacy would be out the window, so we'd keep continuing down this path of being in endless, pointless wars, increasing national debt while that money could have been used building up infrastructure and helping the working class.
Not to mention, he hasn't really done his homework when it comes to Syria, Iraq, Iran and the rest of the middle east... He hasn't done his homework when it comes to a lot of things, really. So sure, I'll hold my nose, and vote Clinton, but only to ensure the alternative isn't in the White House. At least she isn't a baffoon reality tv star, and actually knows shyt about global and domestic problems. Trump seems to have a child-like understanding on many complex issues.