[QUOTE="mr. smoke weed, post: 18768156, member: 273"]K breh act like normal size male adults walk around at 147 or 154 or even 168. No I was responding to a thread about it.
You are the one who is all of the sudden all on Spence's dikk since oh IDK around the time Floyd (who you love to death), propped him up as being able to beat Thurman.
See look at how flawed your argument is "All I did was talk facts about spence clearly being the most skilled at 147" that's clearly opinion breh....and furthermore of course it has to do with who he's fought so far. See triple G---clearly with the top notch skillset at 160 but there's still ???;s because he hasn't fought any top notch competition, and anyone who knows boxing knows the KO's stop coming when you face upper tier guys.
And above all, why should spence have seniority over Thurman?, because he finally took a step up fight and did what he was supposed to? C'mon fam.
Also your replies are mad emotional, stop catching feels.[/QUOTE]
Size and weight are two different things. Spence will look bigger than most guys his height he way 170 because he is in shape. Most men in America aren't even six feet stop with the dum talk.
Boxers are normal people now, boxing shape is normal now, stop playing yourself man. Spence isn't a big guy he's not a small one either.
How am I on spence dikk, because I think he can beat Thurman. You are on Thurman's dikk heavy for thinking that is outside of the realm of possibility.
another dumb ass comparison, who disputes that GGG isn't the best at 160, being criticize him for not moving up after dominating a division, stop talking.
I never said Spence had Seniority over Thurman, I said they are at the same level. Which is true, Thurman hasn't done anything to set him above Spence, he could very well be a bust his damn self. He fighting his first real opponent in Porter just now, so stop it.