Okay that's complete apples and oranges. I'm not saying that I believe everything that they say, what I'm saying is that since she is an elected official what would she have to benefit from lying about this? She was recently elected and if anything it doesn't make sense for her to expose to mans name and maybe open him up to violence or the company to vandalism.
1. I'm in the right to question it( you claim it as assuming) and you go off assuming it without questioning it.
2. What is Apples and Oranges to you? No one is above questioning sir. That's how you hold people accountable.
3. She will receive sympathy for her cause from her opposition parties. As she mentioned,she was briefed how to implement policy changes in her state and what is one of the biggest issues in her area?
4. So it's ok for her to ambiguously claim an assault without going through the proper channels to handle that but put it out on line to expose all cabdrivers ( prefrely white) as racists without giving details.
It would look more legit for her to place out there the subject matter, situation and how it was handled, respectfully. It looks clearly a practiced scenario she will use to implement policy in her area.
Hold people accountable wither they are on your side or not. If you don't you fall short of being played by those who you think are for you.
you still got something to say.
so we suppose to guess if she reported since she never mentioned anything about reporting it nor the mans race, taxi cab number or service out to the public. 
She "reported" it to her twitter fans..and if you dont find it odd that no one can find the cab in an era of GPS logging and digital payments i dont know what to tell you
, this is a special type of stupid
