Fani Willis fan
Veteran
wtf is that dude even rambling on about..a team that went to the finals twice would some how be an 8th seed todayBut kidds nets took 2 against the Spurs in the finals![]()

wtf is that dude even rambling on about..a team that went to the finals twice would some how be an 8th seed todayBut kidds nets took 2 against the Spurs in the finals![]()

It's not a deflection - it's pointing out that you're the one who has an agenda because you claimed a role player of the 90s is better than one of the best PGs today. Nobody in their right mind would even suggest that the Pacers' version of Jackson was better than him - only someone that keeps pushing this 'the league today is watered down' agenda.Thats a lot more reasonable than the dumb shyt you're saying.at you tryna deflect.
I never said that at all.Tell me more about this Raptors team being just as good as the Shaq-Penny Magic. You've been a clown.
I see those Nets squads winning around 42-45 games in today's league, which would be an 8th seed in the East. shyt they would be lucky to win that many games considering how offensively inept there were (their defense would translate over though, which was the backbone of their success). There were certain players whose value was inflated due to them playing in the East during that time - Kidd being one of them.wtf is that dude even rambling on about..a team that went to the finals twice would some how be an 8th seed today![]()
i thought you would post some pace adjusted shyt, if you just going by your gut then i dont wanna hear that.I see those Nets squads winning around 42-45 games in today's league, which would be an 8th seed in the East. shyt they would be lucky to win that many games considering how offensively inept there were (their defense would translate over though, which was the backbone of their success). There were certain players whose value was inflated due to them playing in the East during that time - Kidd being one of them.

So was he dealing with an elbow injury in 2009 when he shot 33% from the field in the post season?He's dealing with an elbow injury which he's had for the last month or so, which is affecting his game (more so his shooting). He was averaging 22 ppg on 15 shots per game up to that point - he basically scored more points than Kidd ever did on greater efficiency.
Lowry - 22.0 ppg on 59.8 TS% (15.6 shots), team had a 117 ORTG while on court
Kidd's best scoring season - 18.7 ppg on 52.6 TS% (15.6 shots), team had a 106 ORG while on court
It's less about an evolution (the key to winning has always been the same) and weighing up what's the best way to play when you're the (or one of) main ball-handler. It just seems the PGs of today are closer to finding a better balance than ones of the past. It's not about how many points and assists you get, it's about whether or not you can generate points for your team (directly or indirectly) at an elite level and not be a handicap to your teammates. Which goes both ways; giving it to them in their spots, knowing when they're hot or have a mismatch, getting others into rhythm AND being able to score at an elite level. Because having another player that scores at an elite level not only makes the offense better in itself, but it opens up the floor for the rest of the team; it creates indecision and chaos in the defense, forces them to send double teams/extra defensive attention, creates more mismatches and stops them from double or helping off other players when they know the main-ball handler isn't looking to score. You have to be a threat to score and to pass at the same time, on every possession.No..I know it may sound arrogant but I watch the game as a player or coach and not a fan.. I'm more into the educational aspect than the entertainment perspective because I eventually want to leave corporate and coach full time..
My favorite PG's are balanced..I love the 20/10 guys like Isiah, CP3, Payton, Strickland and KJ.. It's not all about pass first..I prefer balance.. But if I had to chose between the two I'll take pass first over shoot first every time..
At the end of the day I value winning.. And historically PG's that led their team in FGA have won the title about 5 times in the past 50 years..
Maybe we are about to witness an evolution, but we shall see
![]()
There's a reason why I said this season. And why I've said a few times in this thread that prior to this season Lowry's career has been pretty forgettable. His shooting percentages dropped as soon as he had that injury - prior to that he was performing on a level much higher than he ever had before. Take away the season he had and we're not having this conversation.So was he dealing with an elbow injury in 2009 when he shot 33% from the field in the post season?
Or 2014 when he shot 39% in the post season?
Or last year when he shot 31% from the field and 21% from 3?
Lets be honest.. The reason his fools gold numbers fall apart in the playoffs is because he's been a fat, unprofessional, mental midget who doesn't respect the game enough to properly condition his body so he breaks down...Things that you can NEVER say about Kidd (this is the coach in me talking, sorry)
If THATS the guy you want on your team, I don't know what to tell you...
Now I'm gonna give you and Malta one more chance to just admit you were wrong, you overreacted, take the L and move on.. I'll never mention this conversation again.. Saying your wrong is actually a show of good character.. All real n1ggas have to do it from time to time..

I'm not going on my gut, I'm going on my brain. FDuring those Finals runs they had a 52-win record and 49-win record, respectively - they aren't coming close to those records in the East today simply because their offense isn't good to enough to get by on their defense like they did in the early 00s to win games.i thought you would post some pace adjusted shyt, if you just going by your gut then i dont wanna hear that.
In case you missed it the first time:What is so offensively inept about peak Kidd, RJ entering his peak, peak Kenyon Martin and then fringe stars like Van Horn, thats a solid 4th option.
The Bulls and Wizards had more "fire power" than those Nets teams and they didn't make the playoffs.Did you see some of the teams that got in the east this year ? Pacers and Detroit have more fire power than Kidd's nets ?![]()
wtf is that dude even rambling on about..a team that went to the finals twice would some how be an 8th seed today![]()
where are chicago and washington rankedI'm not going on my gut, I'm going on my brain. FDuring those Finals runs they had a 52-win record and 49-win record, respectively - they aren't coming close to those records in the East today simply because their offense isn't good to enough to get by on their defense like they did in the early 00s to win games.
In case you missed it the first time:
2001/02 Nets - 17th ranked offfense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2002/03 Nets - 18th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2003/04 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2004/05 Nets - 26th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2005/06 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2006/07 Nets - 16th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2007/08 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
And that's just their rankings during those season, can you imagine how bad they'd be in the league today?
The Bulls and Wizards had more "fire power" than those Nets teams and they didn't make the playoffs.
2002 Nets had a 104 offensive ratingwhere are chicago and washington ranked
Hollinger's NBA Team Stats - ESPN Insider - National Basketball Association - ESPN
What is so offensively inept about peak Kidd, RJ entering his peak, peak Kenyon Martin and then fringe stars like Van Horn, thats a solid 4th option.
It's not a deflection - it's pointing out that you're the one who has an agenda because you claimed a role player of the 90s is better than one of the best PGs today. Nobody in their right mind would even suggest that the Pacers' version of Jackson was better than him - only someone that keeps pushing this 'the league today is watered down' agenda.
I never said that at all.
If Lowry is one of the best pgs of today then that's just a testament to how exaggerated the talent at the position is today. Lowry just isn't that good and I've been telling you that this Raptors team sucked for the longest. To say that Lowry is better than Kidd just illustrates how clueless you are. There's a reason why I said this season. And why I've said a few times in this thread that prior to this season Lowry's career has been pretty forgettable. His shooting percentages dropped as soon as he had that injury - prior to that he was performing on a level much higher than he ever had before. Take away the season he had and we're not having this conversation.
Lowry's best season > Kidd's best season. I watched him play all throughout this season and never once did Kidd play better. He was the best guard in the East this season. There's no overreaction bout it, I think plenty of PGs are better than Kidd (not at an all-time level but simply at their best/peak).
teams that suck don't make it to the conference finals though.If Lowry is one of the best pgs of today then that's just a testament to how exaggerated the talent at the position is today. Lowry just isn't that good and I've been telling you that this Raptors team sucked for the longest. To say that Lowry is better than Kidd just illustrates how clueless you are.
You're a liar just like your friend. We were in another discussion about today vs 90s and you damn sure said that this Raptors squad would be up there with the Shaq-Penny Magic if they played in the east back then. This site's search function is fukked so I can't find the post but you damn sure said that.
Prior to his injury last month, he was averaging 22 points on 15 shots and had Toronto as a top-5 offense for pretty much the entire season. He was arguably the best guard in the East. He performed better this season than Kidd did at any point during his prime seasons. At no point of Kidd's career did he prove himself to be more of an offensive threat.If Lowry is one of the best pgs of today then that's just a testament to how exaggerated the talent at the position is today. Lowry just isn't that good and I've been telling you that this Raptors team sucked for the longest. To say that Lowry is better than Kidd just illustrates how clueless you are.
That's not what I said. I said the 90s Bulls and Magic were the only teams that were definitively better than this Raptors squad. Perhaps you're mistaking me for saying they were better than the other teams (Pistons, Cavs etc etc) as if that meant they were up there with the Magic because they were better than those teams.You're a liar just like your friend. We were in another discussion about today vs 90s and you damn sure said that this Raptors squad would be up there with the Shaq-Penny Magic if they played in the east back then. This site's search function is fukked so I can't find the post but you damn sure said that.