superunknown23
Superstar
delete
Last edited:
He's a star because Toronto made him one. They have been desperate for a player to come and be the man.I respect @Malta
But Lowry over Kidd???
I for one never understood Lowry's appeal. Hes a streaky player. Ugly game but it works and thats what matters. At the same time i have no idea how hes an all star
DeRozan is a legitimate star IMO. But Lowry?He's a star because Toronto made him one. They have been desperate for a player to come and be the man.
In reality he's a tier two kinda guy. A solid player, a low level all star kinda player. He's does a lot of things though, steals, takes charges, plays solid defense and rebounds fairly well for a guard. That's why its confusing to see him play like this in the playoffs.
He's not on Kidds level though. and he has shown to have only a slightly higher BBall IQ than DD....and he's not very bb smart.

I respect @Malta
But Lowry over Kidd???
I for one never understood Lowry's appeal. Hes a streaky player. Ugly game but it works and thats what matters. At the same time i have no idea how hes an all star
And he very well had an argument for MVP that season I believe... He was a monsterJ Kidd averaged 21, 10, 7, and 2 stls on the 2002 lakers in the finals. made them games competitive with fukkin kerry kittles and todd macculloch in his starting lineup.
J Kidd averaged 21, 10, 7, and 2 stls on the 2002 lakers in the finals. made them games competitive with fukkin kerry kittles and todd macculloch in his starting lineup.
honestly I put them both in the same category.DeRozan is a legitimate star IMO. But Lowry?
Solid player? Yes.Star??? Nah
Don't tell me what I give and don't give credit for. You could use the same argument for someone like Rubio or Rondo for being "very smart" - yet it doesn't mean shyt in the grand scheme of things when they're a detriment to their team's offense, or don't have the similar impact as other PGs in the league.
Stop it.
I've watched more Kidd's games than 99.9% of this board, on tape and in person. I know his game in and out. I know what he was good at and I know what he wasn't good at. But most importantly I know exactly how he influenced/impacted the game, and it certainly wasn't like all this romanticizing I see going on in this board.
This thread so disrespectful to JKidd and Im not even a big JKidd fan
Breh all you need to know is that those who hold this opinion are up there in SOHH/COLI history as one of the most blasphemous things I have EVER read on here. That says A LOT in my 16 year posting career.And he very well had an argument for MVP that season I believe... He was a monster