Than you should know better. You don't have any excuses. At all.
This couldn't be further from the truth, and I'm doubting if you actually know both of their respective game's at all. Past the fact that "making guys better" is an overcompensating term to begin with, the principles behind it can be applied directly to Lowry's approach to the game and skillset - he's an incredible playmaker/passer, he can identify when players need the ball and when they're hot, he is one of the best PGs at balancing when to pass/shoot, he commands a ton of defensive attention with the ball in hand (opening the floor up for the rest of his teammates and giving them more room to work with), he's effective without the ball, he's an outstanding M2M/team defender and he can carry a lead scoring workload to take pressure off his teammates. Whereas Kidd crippled his teams' offenses because of his lack of scoring ability and his reluctance to shoot. His teammates dealt with more defensive attention because he was hesistant to score; therefore fukking up the overall flow of the offense. And in case you haven't read this -
94/95 - playing next to McCloud and Jackson - ended up with the 15th ranked offense
95/96 - relatively the same personnel - finished with the 19th ranked offense.
96/97 DAL - he only played 22 games - finished with the 28th ranked offense
96/97 PHO - he only played 33 games (started only 22), KJ was the one leading the team that season and they had the 6th ranked offense.
97/98 - Kidd took over starting duties, with relatively the same personnel and they ended with the 12th ranked offense (Nash had superior on-court points production than Kidd - propping up the points per 100 possessions - however, keep in mind it was mostly against second units)
98/99 - lockout season, 50 games, few extra changes to the personnel and they end up with the 4th ranked offense - no coincidence it was statistically Kidd's best shooting season.
99/00 - few extra personnel changes, most notably Penny, and they had the 12th ranked offense
00/01 - Penny was injured for pretty much the entire season, and they had the 22nd ranked offense
2001/02 Nets - 17th ranked offfense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2002/03 Nets - 18th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2003/04 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2004/05 Nets - 26th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2005/06 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 37 minutes)
2006/07 Nets - 16th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
2007/08 Nets - 25th ranked offense (Kidd averaged 36 minutes)
Across 14-15 seasons when Kidd was the leader of the team, he only orchestrated ONE top-10 offense. I can divide. That's one great offense every 14 season average and that's so....
This is horrible, horrible logic. The PG position is 1000000000000x deeper now, than it was during Kidd's prime. Of course there's gonna be more PGs who're better than Lowry today, than there were when Kidd was at his peak.
just curious, have you ever watched jason kidd play in his apex? You keep trying to boil him down to stats and offensive numbers which means your stats don't tell the tale of his leadership, and defense, and other intangibles he had which made him great. Equating jason kidd to a box scrore severely misses the impact he had on the game and his team. This is no diss i'm seriously curious...



