UCLA Study: Women want bad boys to knock them up, nice guys to raise the babies...

[mcdivit85]

What the typical coli poster looks like; who claims to be #HOH and #GMB.

Real talk. When you read over some of the posts here, especially when it comes to real life dating situations, grooming and living at home with their parents, dudes fit this description much more than the opposite. No matter how loud they scream "Hard on Hoes."

Peace

 

[THOT CATALOG]

get involved with ain't shyt brehs who give you butterflies then get divorced when you realize they aint shyt brehettes.

then look for a new man to take on kids they ain't genetically related to as their own and treat you to a lifestyle people dream of without any of the agony and suffering that is part of the process.

then try to guilt the men who have their shyt together for not getting involved in a mess with red flags everywhere.

meanwhile kids grow up in a broken home and all the wealth that could've been passed on to the next generation gets eaten up by cac lawyers and the cycle of minority poverty continues.

life is a bytch ain't it.

 

[THOT CATALOG]

thread reeks of revenge of the nerds but who else do you expect to be on an internet forum.

the internet is for losers who can't find validation in the real world. we all ain't shyt.

 

[mcdivit85]

I guess but I know a lot of nerdy looking guys that would easily take heads off. It's 2016, you would be surprised by the number of boys and men joining their local fight gyms. Anyone could easily become a feature on the next WS fight comp.

Those types are joining their local fight gyms because they're tired of getting clowned and abused in public form. Anybody can get it, but not everybody hands it out equally

Peace

 

[General Mills]

DNA tests aren't to protect men from infidelity

Nothing can protect anyone from infidelity....if someone in a relationship wants to cheat at any time....it's gonna happen, and can't nobody stop it

DNA tests are to protect me from potential LIES about not just infidelity, but also biological connection to a child. Why do they need this protection? 1. to avoid later devastation and depression after realizing that the child they loved and connected to for years isn't their blood legacy (this applies to the child as well as the tricked man), and 2. to avoid being forced by the law to pay hard-earned money for a child that's not even biologically theirs

Now why would a woman need this particular protection when she KNOWS that the kid that came out of her, is hers?

Gospel

 

[Dwayne_Taylor]

yeah it would be best for him to bring it up early on, so I could just avoid it altogether and not get pregnant or leave if I wanted kids.

I honestly wouldn't want the hospital to test my kids either. I'm just against DNA testing. Of course if I needed it to be done like if I didn't know who the father of my child was, I would do it. But since I'll never have that problem, I don't want any of my children I have to do it.

Hmm... would you require a man, husband or boyfriend, to get tested before having unprotected sex ? Should the man in question take that as an insult, as if you don't trust him?

 

[Blackout]

Rogers was a nerd that shot up ppl cause he couldn't get p*ssy. So you saying that bytches need to give out p*ssy to nerds so they don't get shot? How about tell nerds not to be butthurt and shoot ppl

Yeah Elliot is a crappy example.

A better example would be us just having to deal with a lot of bitter chicks and kent types because of this behavior.

 

[BaggerofTea]

When were the good ole days when we could knock a bytch out and take her back to the cave/tent to reproduce?


Would save a lot of this confusion and nonsense

 

[mcdivit85]

I see how you're seeing it, I just see it the opposite way.
Obviously those 30% of guys who are unknowingly raising babies that aren't theirs biologically trusted their wives too.

I personally think that every baby should be tested at the hospital and then there wouldnt be this stigma that you would feel your husband didn't trust you.

Since that's not likely too become the rule any time soon so the next best thing is for men to voice their want for a test from early on in the relationship. That way hopefully there's no arguing or bad feelings on either part.

Children are entitled to know their biological history at the very least.

I like your stance, but in my opinion, dudes don't even need to let the woman know. Me, I would simply get a home DNA test, swab the child and send the sample. Once I get the results, I know. No need to announce anything. If the child is mine, she's none the wiser and I feel safe in raising this child as my own. If the child is not mine, just like I didn't let her know about me purchasing a DNA test, I won't let her know that I took off work and had divorce papers drawn up. But she'll find out when she comes home to an empty house with divorce papers sitting in the middle of the barren living room.

Like you said, DNA testing should be done at the hospital before the child is released. Not only for the moral purpose of having the father know the child is his. But for medical purposes as well. How many children/adults suffer medical issues because they don't know their true family medical history. All because some THOT wanted to keep some semblance of dignity that isn't warranted in the first place.

Peace

 

[Ghost Utmost]

I would suggest you men make it clear prior to any unprotected sex that you will absolutely want a dna test for any child that's supposed to be yours. You don't have to accuse her of anything, let her know that you are/have been aware of this 30% stat and you never want to be in that situation.
Make it clear from day 1.

A woman with nothing to hide should be all for it. No reason to be offended if you know your p*ssy hasn't been anywhere it wasn't supposed to be.

I woulda done this with my ex wife. Knowing what I know now, I woulda been smart to double check her azz.

I don't have any kids but of I ever do they getting tested OFF RIP.

My little brother thought he had a son for 7 -8 years until she tried to take him for child support. By then he had already got the bish preggo for real. shyt was so fukced up.

 

[MidniteJay]

I literally said he can get the kids tested and I wouldn't try to stop him. I've never cheated and never will.

Would you hit him with the child support after? Get a real L trying to prevent an imaginary L, brehs.

 

[Bald Head Ba$tard]

This thread went down south FAST.

But really doe. This is mostly accurate. Some points may be exaggerated, but this is shyt that's been known for centuries

I've said it b4 on here, I'll say it again. A "Nice guy" ain't gonna be flapping his gums on facebook about allegedly being nice. He Gonna be it. The nikkas that claim they're nice are narcissistic and hate the world if they don't see shyt their way. I'm not making this up.

An aggressive or str8 up a$$hole nikka gets it in because he got that fire. A bytch nikka don't get it in bc he's an ice sickle.

Nothing wrong with being nice. But when you just co-sign everything she say, then you a fakkit. nikkas be afraid to piss women off, it's hilarious to me.

 

[PartyHeart]

@PartyHeart
I gotta step in and disagree with you here
"Men have the added burden of being uncertain of paternity " isn't the little mild annoyance that you make it out to be if the child isn't theirs. Not just the financial implications but what about years spent bonding or not bonding with a child? What about. The child being deprived of his opportunity to bond or not bond?

It's certainly not the same as "well we women have to go through the pain of childbirth "

Think of it this way. If tomorrow hospitals did away with all safeguards and security to ensure mothers were going home. With. The correct bio baby and it came to light that 30% of us took home the wrong baby, would we women not. Rightfully raise all kinds of he'll to get that addressed? Of course we would.

As far as the comparison to outside babies we can divorce and not concern have any of our monetary or time or emotional resources go towards this outside baby that's not ours. In most states or after a certain amount of time, men can divorce but they cannot deny his monetary resources to or emotional resources to. This equally outside baby.

Posting from my phone. Sorry for. Crazy punctuation and. Capitalization.

Again, its not going to be the same thing for men and women. For men its the uncertainty of paternity. For women, its wasting your child bearing years on an unfaithful man who had kids outside your relationship. Divorce does not get years back for women. A woman marries an unfaithful man who created children outside of their relationship, she stands to lose a lot. That's something that is more than beyond a mild annoyance. However, can you imagine legislation being made for that? Would you agree with such legislation, and what would it dictate? If you do agree, OK, at least you are equal in your using the law to legislate personal matters. I can't imagine the guys in here feel the same.

If a man has a baby outside of the relationship, the woman inside of the relationship wouldn't have any connection to the child whatsoever. She would not think the child is hers and feel inclined to caretake the child as such because she knows 100% that it wasn't hers because the child didn't exit from her womb

pain of childbirth, while VERY painful, isn't a free pass to take it out in unrelated ways to unrelated people. That is like me getting kicked in the crotch (painful for men) by some random chick and then deciding to yell at a different woman in order to get even. It would make no sense

This isn't about emotions or infidelity or pain, this is about children and family

they have home dna tests now and the gov't makes you take them if the father isn't on the birth certificate (if you receive benefits)...it's not an expensive process.

Its not a tit for tat thing. What I'm saying is about children and family too, its just from the side of women. But what you all don't understand is that I didn't post to try to stop you guys from being #HOH or whatever it is you're getting at. If you get with a woman who is comfortable being held under a microscope about her faithfulness after she gives birth, first understand that a large portion of women will have a problem with it. But otherwise, have at it. All I'm just saying is, is that its nonsensical to try to make it mandatory thru legislation.

 

[mcdivit85]

Alphas don't pay for p*ssy...

Here's a test:

Do YOU pay for p*ssy? Or do you just go outside and get it thrown at you?



I've seen Iron Mike in action back when he was super rich, he's an alpha to other men (other men drooled over him), but to the women... He was just another trick.

Kinda sad... Mike has a lot of insecurities and he got preyed on. Mike was straight food...

Dudes get this confused alot. There's dudes who are the sh#t to other men(athletes,rappers, etc.) and then there's dudes who are the sh#t to women. In many cases, dudes are stronger in one area than the other, so they might have the adulation of men but be regular with women. And vice versa. A lot of athletes fall into this realm and many of their male fans think the world of them, but women are not moved by them very much. Do women pay attention to all the attention these guys get and work their way into their circle, yes. But that doesn't mean they actually LIKE these guys.

Many an "alpha" has been played by a dude who was low key regulating his chick. The term "alpha" is used out of context in many cases. Calling another man "alpha" on some "he's a bad ass" is to me.

The sweet spot is being able to be respected amongst men and desired by women equally, but very few men do this.

And this chick is right....paying for sex automatically places you in "LAME" status. Simply put. No matter how many TDs you throw, how high you can jump or how many KOs you turn out

Peace

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

Women go after bad boys when they've been abused (or abandoned) physically, verbally or sexually by their father or male figures in their life.

This is what dudes don't seem to understand and what makes this thread shifty.

It's not "bad boys" vs. "nice guys" that's not what this is about.

You guys are going too hard on Juicy. She just sounds young and naive. Leave it alone. It's her life.

Get this simp shyt out of here. You don't get to argue, make some asinine statement, say some ill bullshyt and just slide on through. She's getting called out because of what she said, not who she is.

And can everyone please back off Juicy? It's several posters vs just her.

Several posters disagree with her, should they hold their tongue?

I never understood this logic. If I'm arguing some dope shyt it doesn't matter how many folks disagree with me, I'm still making my points.

No need to come in defending someone, she not a victim.