UCLA Study: Women want bad boys to knock them up, nice guys to raise the babies...

Arris

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
9,049
Reputation
2,814
Daps
33,442
Reppin
Cleveland
Some men would rather live their life in worry with a woman they don't trust then not to be with her.
cmon breh:comeon: you of all people shouldnt be in here talking about this. if you were less careless you'd proly have a whole litter out there who Doesnt know who their real father is:pachaha:

All the same story. Hubby isn't hitting it right or handling business. They like my pics, comment on the dikk print subliminally.

After you like her pics back she's in ya inbox. Months or even days of playing chatty cake, they wanna meet someone far from our area. Even drove to Piscataway and she lives in Irvington.

I never ever make the first move, I never persuade them to have an affair. It's all on them. I just play my role to the best of my ability. Facebook done changed the game in my opinion. A simple poke can lead to some real like poking.


Pof/okcupid is a bit more wild in my opinion and deceitful. Very rare you have an woman tell you her situation. They get on there with no commitment /dating but nothing serious. You see that and you know they're creeping.

I remember I asked one woman about the possibility of her boyfriend finding out, she told me he's too busy watching ESPN and playing fantasy football. And she was right, homie had no idea until she told him and they got a divorce but got back together.


Any questions on how to avoid being that man yelling at 32 inch plasma over sports while he thinks his girl or wife is over her family house or working late , feel free to drop them here. I have jewels to drop. I just saved my boy marriage. His wife came close on cheating on him, he read her secret facebook page. Instead of flipping out she spoke with me and I told him what he needed to do. Now that Facebook is deleted and the potential side nikka is gone.

Yes I'm bragging :yeshrug: but I'm also helping.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,969
Great article:
"Several suggested that DNA paternity tests should be routine at birth, or at least before every paternity acknowledgment is signed and every default order entered. In 2001 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court urged the state to require that putative fathers submit to genetic testing before signing a paternity-acknowledgment form or child-support agreement, arguing that “to do otherwise places at risk the well-being of children.”

In other words, the same care that hospitals take ensuring that the right mother is connected to the right newborn — footprints, matching ID bands, guarded nurseries, surveillance cameras — should be taken to verify that the right man is deemed father.

Mandatory DNA testing for everyone would be a radical, not to mention costly, shift in policy. Some advocates propose a somewhat more practical solution: that men who waive the DNA test at a child’s birth should be informed quite clearly that refusing the test will prohibit them from challenging paternity later. Yes, the plan would reveal truths some men might not want to know. Yes, it would raise administrative costs, lower the number of paternity establishments and blow apart some families. But far fewer children would be entangled in traumatic disputes in which men they call Daddy suddenly reject them."


You hear a lot of bum nikkas on the Coli complain about child-support because they don't want to pay it, but there is a much larger problem, and that is with men who shouldn't be paying child support, because they aren't the fathers.
 

Rick Fox at UNC

Superstar
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
5,970
Reputation
1,223
Daps
13,464
Reppin
Pretty Boys
women outnumber men so a "some" in y'all world is "most" in ours. 8 to 1 avg (black people)...18 to 1 in DC.
Truly, brehs shouldn't even care too much about what a jawn thinks. Advantage is built in.
Yes, most females play psychological games. You are the exception (in this conversation), and exceptions don't make the rules.

So y'all just get on the internet to start lying?

18 to 1 Female-to-male ratio in DC huh? :martin:

I've said it b4 on here, I'll say it again. A "Nice guy" ain't gonna be flapping his gums on facebook about allegedly being nice. He Gonna be it. The nikkas that claim they're nice are narcissistic and hate the world if they don't see shyt their way. I'm not making this up.

I agree with the bolded.

Yea, this isn't even about nice guy vs. bad boy; those two are really similar in terms of being able to attract women naturally. There are a lot of neurotic, smart, and chill girls who love nothing more than a nice guy coming in and completing who she is, making her feel amazing. You see couples like this every single day of the week.

A lot of dudes are trying to live out something that isn't them though (as are a lot of women, but women always have an advantage). You see guys posting Dan Blizerian (sp*) photos and looking up to male celebrities and athletes in this fetishized way. nikkas want to be Rob Gronkowski out here, but they 5'11" with a gut, no game, no athletic ability, and no personality because they've supressed the one they have in order to appear to be someone they are not.

Makes dudes look lame in the end and they end up in provider territory.

This is about a provider vs. a "nice guy" or "bad boy" or "joker" type dude. In other words, guys who can emotionally connect with women in a meaningful way and guys that rely almost exclusively on their resources and their ability to "provide."

This... Criminals and thugs are not the brightest, strongest or healthiest. They're the dumbest, weakest and least healthy. A man who has no self control is a garbage azz man...

This is silly.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,969
yeah it would be best for him to bring it up early on, so I could just avoid it altogether and not get pregnant or leave if I wanted kids.

I honestly wouldn't want the hospital to test my kids either. I'm just against DNA testing. Of course if I needed it to be done like if I didn't know who the father of my child was, I would do it. But since I'll never have that problem, I don't want any of my children I have to do it.
nikkas don't even believe the Earth is a sphereoid, getting them to believe the child is theirs with all the fukkery in the world is a challenge.
 

Just like bruddas

Couple shooters in the cut.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,803
Reputation
4,212
Daps
51,682
cmon breh:comeon: you of all people shouldnt be in here talking about this. if you were less careless you'd proly have a whole litter out there who Doesnt know who their real father is:pachaha:


So this should make you believe me even more friend. Think about it, I have been through the dark part of love and relationships to tell every person that it's always signs of a affair being had.

If you don't trust her then don't be with her, it's impossible to be caught off guard especially if you know your wife routine, and her body like a man is supposed too.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,779
Daps
92,579
Great article:
"Several suggested that DNA paternity tests should be routine at birth, or at least before every paternity acknowledgment is signed and every default order entered. In 2001 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court urged the state to require that putative fathers submit to genetic testing before signing a paternity-acknowledgment form or child-support agreement, arguing that “to do otherwise places at risk the well-being of children.”

In other words, the same care that hospitals take ensuring that the right mother is connected to the right newborn — footprints, matching ID bands, guarded nurseries, surveillance cameras — should be taken to verify that the right man is deemed father.

Mandatory DNA testing for everyone would be a radical, not to mention costly, shift in policy. Some advocates propose a somewhat more practical solution: that men who waive the DNA test at a child’s birth should be informed quite clearly that refusing the test will prohibit them from challenging paternity later. Yes, the plan would reveal truths some men might not want to know. Yes, it would raise administrative costs, lower the number of paternity establishments and blow apart some families. But far fewer children would be entangled in traumatic disputes in which men they call Daddy suddenly reject them."


You hear a lot of bum nikkas on the Coli complain about child-support because they don't want to pay it, but there is a much larger problem, and that is with men who shouldn't be paying child support, because they aren't the fathers.


In Va before a man can sign a birth certificate they have to sign off on the acknowledgement form that they are

Entitled to a dna test if they wish
If they waive one then they forfeit any future paternity challenge
Entitled to consult a lawyer prior to signing

It's spelled out very clearly.
I think this is great.
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,473
Reppin
The 215
If I get older and come to the conclusion that my dad is a sucker, or my mom might have been a jump off why is that not allowed? I can still love someone and be honest about their faults. Might even help me avoid the same problems.

Letting emotions stop you from acknowledging reality sounds like some female shyt to me...
Yall cats gotta stop doing this making up narratives shyt. Its soo weak. Where did I say YOU or anybody else couldn't do the first question? I'm just being honest and most people don't look at their parents as failures and jumpoffs esp when that means you are probably the same thing or worse. The only thing that is female is when cats make up narratives that aren't even said or implied.

The Coli is a vast wasteland of dry/ashy dikk folks jerking to their tears and sobs... :lolbron:

I don't know any men like these-in real life-who hate women and are not capable of having healthy relationships...:yeshrug:

It's actually pretty sad...
This is another reason why stuff look funny regarding bold. Just like you I don't see dudes IRL on this stuff so it makes it look even worse coming online seeing dudes act like this. Like the guy above you talking about his parents could be suckers and jumpoffs and whats wrong with saying so if they are. Its nothing wrong with it if that's how you feel but being realistic who the fukk says that about their own parents outside of some fukked up situations? That's why its crazy to see cats possibly living/thinking like this IRL. I kinda feel bad for the chick they get with and or future kids cause they probably poison them too. I also agree for better or worse damn near every dude IRL I know wants a main woman not this GMB type stuff you see on here. Now all of them aren't the most faithful which I guess is another story but still lol.
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,473
Reppin
The 215
And can everyone please back off Juicy? It's several posters vs just her.
She doesn't even have any babies and is still a newlywed. No need to personalize the argument about hypothetical babies.

Let's keep it relatively cordial please.
Its hard and unrealistic IMO to "back off" juicy and partyheart because both have views on this matter that others even you disagree with so that how you get everybody coming at them. I just say keep it cordial outside of that its no need to "back off" them hell its been threads where I've been in the same position as them. Sometimes when your views are divergent to the rest that's whats going to happen even repeating yourself over and over.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,779
Daps
92,579
Its hard and unrealistic IMO to "back off" juicy and partyheart because both have views on this matter that others even you disagree with so that how you get everybody coming at them. I just say keep it cordial outside of that its no need to "back off" them hell its been threads where I've been in the same position as them. Sometimes when your views are divergent to the rest that's whats going to happen even repeating yourself over and over.


I tried. :yeshrug:
I didn't like what I was seeing so I spoke on it.
Everybody is gonna do what they feel is right and post thusly.
It's all good.
I think most of us are capable of disagreeing in one thread and agreeing in another.
 

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,473
Reppin
The 215
thanks :hug:

I kinda expected this kind of response though.

I wonder if they would stay with a woman that made them get routine std tests and made them always wear condoms because other men pass on stds to their partners
.
I would if it would put her at ease cause I'm not selfish and don't have anything to hide regarding the test. Condoms part doesn't really make sense if somebody getting tested "routinely" but I understand you have to wildly exaggerate to try to make a point right now.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,991
Reputation
8,158
Daps
98,614
All I'm just saying is, is that its nonsensical to try to make it mandatory thru legislation.
Its not nonsensical. :what:

If you are faithful then you wouldnt care if a law like that gets passed. :yeshrug:
 
Last edited:
Top