MalikReloaded
All Star
Explain yourself then....how did I misinterpret it?
UCLA Study: Women want bad boys to knock them up, nice guys to raise the babies...
- Thread starter MalikReloaded
- Start date
Explain yourself then....how did I misinterpret it?
There is nothing wrong with being a nice guy or a good guy, problem is these guys go after uninterested women and feel that its wrong for the women to reject them since they are "nice" or "good".
Most nice guys wise up and realize to only go after women who are interested.
WhodatWhoadi
Naw
killing kids/your child is.
WhodatWhoadi
Naw
cot damnI think it's funny how the female posters are nowhere to be seen. It seems like they can't handle the heat... the data's right here ladies. Right @LadySimone @bcrusaderw @Jisselle @Giselle @Spotlessmind @Kiki128 @Ming Garden @Dollfacecraze @Paradise Road @Caliban @ChocolateQueen @Colicat @princess125 @VFib @Chelsea Bridge @MsCritic7 @agnosticlady @SouthernBelle @thirdeye. Oh and I predict that @Strawberry will be a single mother. She is always talking about sleeping withmen so I feel bad for the simp that decides to save her once her youth is gone .Look ladies there's no problem with wanting to have kids with someone you are attracted to. The thing is though, don't try to coerce someone else to take care of your kids once this "amazing guy" has pumped and dumped you. Single moms don't need love, they need to live with the mistakes that they have made. If someone drops out of college then proceeds to cry about how they can't find a job, it's their fault. If someone complains about not being able to attract women but is fat, that's their fault. IF A WOMAN DECIDES TO HAVE A KID WITH SOMEONE THAT SHE KNOWS WILL NOT STICK AROUND, THAT"S HER FAULT. Oh and I also have a theory about women who use thecoli.com. These female posters tend to be women who fall into one of 4 categories. 1. women who have been pumped and dumped by alphas so they spend their days on the internet because they realized that they were used and have no worth 2. women who get no male attention irl so they seek attention online.3. women who are mad that they can't attract alphas so they come online to spew their hate of men (see feminists). 4. fat women. #HOHs should be #HOW hard on wh*res.
MalikReloaded
All Star
No.
It's called cutting through the bullshyt.
Science mumbo jumbo says men are attracted to youthful, feminine, fertile women with asymmetrical faces, bodies suitable for child bearing and breasts suitable for feeding offspring.
Or you could just say men like young, hot women with nice curves, big titties and a big booty.
Who's more likely to be dominant, aggressive, masculine and domineering? The nice guy or the bad boy?
Who's more likely to be a calming, nurturing, tender, a provider, stable and faithful? The nice guy or the bad boy?
Play stupid though.
I don't care either way
Also....if you read the article, it flat out says that some women will sleep with one man (the dominant) and then get another man (the provider) to raise the offspring.....a phenomenon we see play out in real life routinely.....what's your argument to that, hun bun
Last edited:
I agree with you about one having to accept rejection. My point is not about that. It is about the fact that the good guy (no man should be a nice guy) is only considered to be the a woman's fall back option when her life is in shambles which is blatantly disrespectful as this suggests that he should accept being settled for.
I have the mindset that if something was not acceptable in the past then it should continue to be that way now.
Last edited:
MalikReloaded
All Star
Nikkas reading this article and flat out lying 
Of course, it's written in academic language. As if UCLA gonna talk about alphas, betas, simps, nerds, lames, players, thugs and bad boys in their study
Even then, the study is extremely straight forward.
Women want to be inseminated by the most physically dominant men......we can leave it up to mystery who these men are
..........and then once the babies are born, they want commitment (marriage). If those guys don't offer commitment (marriage), they try to hook up with faithful, nurturing providers........we can leave it up to mystery who these men are
Of course, it's written in academic language. As if UCLA gonna talk about alphas, betas, simps, nerds, lames, players, thugs and bad boys in their study
Even then, the study is extremely straight forward.
Women want to be inseminated by the most physically dominant men......we can leave it up to mystery who these men are
..........and then once the babies are born, they want commitment (marriage). If those guys don't offer commitment (marriage), they try to hook up with faithful, nurturing providers........we can leave it up to mystery who these men are StickStickly
Superstar
Literally reading way too much into the article.No.
It's called cutting through the bullshyt.
Science mumbo jumbo says men are attracted to youthful, feminine, fertile women with asymmetrical faces, bodies suitable for child bearing and breasts suitable for feeding offspring.
You can cut all that bullshyt down by just saying men like young, hot women with nice curves, big titties and a big booty.
Who's more likely to be dominant, aggressive, masculine and domineering? The nice guy or the bad boy?
Who's more likely to be a calming, nurturing, tender, a provider, stable and faithful? The nice guy or the bad boy?
Play stupid though.
I don't care either way
Also....if you read the article, it flat out says that some women will sleep with one man (the dominant) and then get another man (the provider) to raise the offspring.....a phenomenon we see play out in real life routinely.....what's your argument to that, hun bun
Physical attractiveness and dominance for sex
Character for companionship.
Tale as old as time.
AGAIN, nice guys can be dominant. You assume dominant means aggressive, bad boy, a$$hole. The word means more than that. You are ascribing your insecurities here. I could say that you are showing dominant traits in this thread by your attitude, so by your logic that makes you a thug and not a nice guy?
AGAIN AGAIN, the study says nothing about nice guys vs bad boys. It says women want to have sex with physically attractive dominant men, they can be nice or bad. But they want to settle down with men who all prove to be good fathers and husbands. I'd like to smack a big fat DUH on that because men want the same thing; sex with the sexy women and children with the maternal women. Mammals want the same thing.
your assumption is that ugly = nice and that attractive = bad boy. You also assume dominant = abusive. You also assume attractive men (the ones having casual sex) have no "good guy" traits.
MalikReloaded
All Star
Yea, okay.
Sounds like you just think this study is an attack on females and you're trying to make yourself and other women look better
Like I said....science says men like fertile, youthful, feminine women with child bearing hips and milk for our offspring.
That translate to men liking hot, sexy women in their 20s with big breasts, curves/hips and a nice ass.
See how easy I can admit that
If was disingenuous like you, I'd be like "no no, men aren't shallow like that. we love old overweight menopausal women who aren't attractive too". Even though it's a lie that goes against 100,000 years of male sexual behavior.
For female sexual behavior....when they're pre-pregnancy....they're looking for the dominant alpha. Someone who is physical, attractive, dominant, aggressive, masculine, a leader, has social status, elusive, unpredictable and exciting. They want his superior genes for their children. When they're post-pregnancy......they're looking for a provider. Someone who is nurturing, faithful, willing to commit, tender, reliable, stable, kind. Like I said you're trolling HARD trying to act like you can't see which characters are which. I'm not falling for it. Go on somewhere
You don't even make sense. How can those two people be the same? How can you be unpredictable but, reliable? Aggressive but, kind Willing to commit but, elusive Tender but, dominant Boring but, exciting The bottom line is, in the eyes of women you ain't shyt if you a morally decent dude but you are everything if you are a dirty, scandalous dude.
So why not be that dirty, scandalous dude if being that way is highly respected by women?
So why not be that dirty, scandalous dude if being that way is highly respected by women?
I think what these dudes have been arguing for the past two days about (two millenniums actually) is, hey you wanna be a thot then be a thot. Just don't bring a kid into your thotdom and expect the next man to raise it, which is what a lot of women hope to accomplish.
A couple years back I over heard some female coworkers of mine commiserating about the lack of good men out there. This one dominican who got knocked up twice by the same scum bag says "I just want a nice guy" and they all concurred. In my mind, I was like
Dominicansbelit
All Star
Nothing wrong with a nikka stepping up to raise a kid that he KNOWS isn't his (as long as he's 100% sure, and doesn't try to bail out after he's in too deep)
On the other hand....when you're coerced into it after being deceived, via religion/female persuasion......like this Christian cac whose wife got pregnant by a young nikka who they let in their house....
smdh...also kid is biracial too so he sticks out...bytch was smiling a wide smile too talking about how she was attracted to the young cat who they allowed into their house too. probably still thirsting for that cock