I'm saying, is there anyway to avoid paying taxes on it?Next year's tax form is going to ask you front and center. Trust you won't miss it
The IRS has officially moved its crypto tax question to the top of Form 1040, making it much more prominent
I'm saying, is there anyway to avoid paying taxes on it?Next year's tax form is going to ask you front and center. Trust you won't miss it
The IRS has officially moved its crypto tax question to the top of Form 1040, making it much more prominent
I'm saying, is there anyway to avoid paying taxes on it?
I'm saying, is there anyway to avoid paying taxes on it?
Since I just got to a computer might as well sort through this hot confused mess for everyone who cares.
>Vulnerable to professional hacks. If someone could gain 51% of the computing power, they can hack the entire system.
Miners can only double-spend transactions meaning you are at risk if you accept large transactions from a would-be miner entity who could potentially defraud you by rewinding the transaction and essentially getting the coins back. That does not mean in any way that they "can hack the entire system". The cornerstone of the Bitcoin security model is the incentive for miners to continue mining rationally because that is the most profitable behavior for them. This is game theory and economics. To rewrite older transactions they'd have to maintain 51% over a long period of time which, at this point in the game, is just not happening.
Miners do not control Bitcoin nor can they control the supply even if one person was to own 100% of the hashing power. Economic nodes decide the rules of the protocol and miners are paid to follow them.
It's shadowy dark money groups, billionaires, groups with wealthy backers...so when I say large mining groups have control, this is what I mean
The pow system prioritizes miners who can "crack the code" the fastest (speaking in the simplest of terms here). Wealthy groups have the resources to buy the most computing power. To ensure they continue to make money from mining, its in their interest to consolidate with other large mining groups. So yes, a few wealthy parties end up controlling the system 
The vast portion of Bitcoin’s hash rate is sourced from a handful of cloud contract-providers and private mining farms. The purpose of a decentralized money is to ensure no one or few entities can collude to gain control of the money. However, the concentration of mining power is threatening the very reason Nakamoto created Bitcoin: decentralizing control over wealth.
If electric grid goes down then everything is at risk. Bitcoin is not alone. Guns, bullets, food sure. Gold market would crater as well because it is highly reliant on global institutions nowadays so it wouldn't be much of a reliable option anyway.
There have been 51 percent attacks on multiple coins, what are you talking about? Everything you wrote is irrelevant. The only thing and I mean the only thing stopping people from targeting Bitcoin is the cost in doing so. It makes more economic sense to attack smaller cryptos but, it is possible. Especially as computing power grows and decreases in cost. I don't need you to editorialize why YOU THINK it wouldn't happen, I was merely making the comment that its a possibility and it is.
It's shadowy dark money groups, billionaires, groups with wealthy backers...so when I say large mining groups have control, this is what I meanThe pow system prioritizes miners who can "crack the code" the fastest (speaking in the simplest of terms here). Wealthy groups have the resources to buy the most computing power. To ensure they continue to make money from mining, its in their interest to consolidate with other large mining groups. So yes, a few wealthy parties end up controlling the system
![]()
I have been in a few of these mines. You haven't.
What happens in shytcoin land has nothing do to with the incentive system of Bitcoin. It is possible, yes, but not economically rational to 51% Bitcoin.
Moreover, you still don't seem to understand that miners do not decide the rules of the system nor can they change it so it doesn't matter if the fukking Bildeberg control mining they can't do shyt but play along and get paid for ordering transactions.
Miners work for the Bitcoin economy. They don't control shyt
I got better things to do with my Sunday than explain basic concepts to you.If i make 2 transactions at different times to equate the value of 1 bitcoin does my 2 half shares turn into 1 full share?
So in other words, it’s possible then. Next.
Anybody can have a mining rig. There’s a reason you don’t still do it....because it’s a rich man’s game as I was saying. Next.
Miners do “control” the Bitcoin economy. WTF are you talking about. It’s a handful of miners processing the majority of transactions. You think institutions have invested billions into Bitcoin but it’s improbable that the same wealthy types wouldn’t control the network itself. That’s naiveI got better things to do with my Sunday than explain basic concepts to you.
not what i meant but by your response i have my answer. No it doesn't consolidate into one coin and i can sell fractions if i want out but not all the way out.Ya if you buy .1 bitcoin and then later buy another .1 bitcoin you have .2 bitcoin....
What do you mean control? All miners can do is say yes or no to processing a transaction. They can't steal anything from anyone.
not what i meant but by your response i have my answer. No it doesn't consolidate into one coin and i can sell fractions if i want out but not all the way out.
An individual miner could refuse to include a transaction in a block but the system is designed so that miners must include any fee-paying transaction in order to remain economically competitive. A miner who would say "no" would eventually run itself out of business.
So effectively miners do not even get to control transaction selection, on top of already having no control over currency supply or protocol rules.
There must be some type of definition of "control" that escapes us.
Oh sorry were you just asking if fractional buying was possible? Of course