HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
Both are equally disgusting, which I tell wenches directly.
14 year old black child shot at for asking directions *He is alive* Attacker found GUILTY
- Thread starter Afro
- Start date
-
- Tags
- cacfear race sameolthing
White dude could have easily look out his window and ask the kid what he wanted first
Give him 10 years no parole
Give him 10 years no parole
Both are equally disgusting, which I tell wenches directly.
They created feminism so they get a pass from the world.
HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
You get it.
Why do parents give younger children phones?
They give them phones so they have a means of communication in emergency situations. Of course she couldn't have anticipated this happening but the fact of the matter is, the one time where a phone could have saved him is the time he didn't have it and it's because she took it away.
So the wife couldn't just threaten the kid by saying she was going to call the cops? They had to bring the shot gun out?
All he did was stand there.
All extra mom shyt doesn't matter, mom has nothing to do with this case.
Thank God you dudes weren't on the jury
Probably would've found the neighbor not guilty.
Keep expecting white people to not be racist and see how that works out for you. We can only control what's in our control. "Why can't white people just stop being racist" is the exact opposite of a strategy.
There's no excuse to handicap a Black child by taking away something from them that you likely only purchased so they could contact you in the event of an emergency.
14 is not a young age to have a phone
But if his phone use was for social media and friend interaction, how can you punish a child if they did wrong? They can still use the phone for that use to communicate with their friends. So when you punish your child what should you do? Let them have their phone when that is what they want the most and will still give them the ability do everything they want?
I understand what you’re saying but in this time... what’s a useful punishment if not to take away what they covet he most? A phone is that asset for them.
How about taking the phone away during the time they'd use it most, the window of time between then getting home and leaving for school.
Take the phone once the kid gets home, return it in the morning before school. There are even apps parents can install to restrict usage of certain apps, for example, a parent could disable all social media, the app store and the browser and the phone remains usable for cases where the parent needs to contact the child.
So you think kids don’t use the phone for those reasons even at school? How many teenagers do you know?
Ok about the apps? how many parents know about that? So you’re demonizing her for not knowing all the ways to prevent her son from using the phone for his own purposes. What about when most kids didn’t have phones for emergency use? What were kids doing if they happen to get lost? What if they knocked on someone’s door hoping to use a phone to call their parent? Is it still the parents fault that their child happened to come across people like this and got shot at for just trying to get home?
He been saying the same silly shyt to me in the much larger thread that was created half a year ago when the story broke.
I gave up trying to make sense of it. He is going to continue to argue that phones are more important than air, food, or shelter and that his black mom is more at fault than the white couple. it's a losing battle, so quit while you are ahead....
He was 14, not 4. Teenagers aren't getting 3310s and phone cards for emergencies anymore, they are now purchasing iPhones and Samsungs as entertainment tools. Therefore taking smartphones away for punishment really can't be considered blatant child endangerment.
If this had happened 20 years ago, who would you have blamed? Cause that's still who you should blame today.
