Those same Lakers blew past everybody in the Western Conference, even your precious Spurs. Are you saying Golden State would murder the Spurs too?
These dudes can't stop LeBron from going to the hole whenever he wants but, they would stop Shaq? They'd all be in foul trouble every game. Pachulia & Green trying to guard Shaq
Just because I like Duncan means I need to overrate his teams? I already posted about them -
This Cavs team is better than the 2001 Spurs, the fukk are you talking about? They had Antonio Daniels, Terry Porter and Danny Ferry starting with Duncan and Robinson. Robinson was 35, Ferry was 34 and Porter was 37
Cot damn man, you overrate the shyt out of everything from the past.
"They can't stop LeBron" like he's not surrounded by 3-4 shooters in every lineup, like the Cavs didn't just hit 24 cot damn threes.
Yes or no, could the Lakers stop the Warriors offense?
They hit 24 3's in part because the Warriors defense was atrocious and just a minute ago you said that's the only way the Warriors could take an L but last game everyone knows the Cavs mismanaged the clock something serious. Warriors would have dropped games against the Spurs too if Leonard didn't go down. 
"They can't stop LeBron" like he's not surrounded by 3-4 shooters in every lineup, like the Cavs didn't just hit 24 cot damn threes.
Yes or no, could the Lakers stop the Warriors offense?
They would've had to keep a constant double or triple team on Shaq. There would have been none of this run and gun a mile of minute game speed happening. Shaq would have slowed the game down and had that team banged up and worn out from trying to guard him. You overrating Golden State and playing down what made LA hard to beat.
Lakers only dropped a game because of a superhuman effort from Iverson
)
Fox (.393), Fisher (.397) and Horry (.346) were all capable of hitting the three along with Bryant (.305). They shot better than Bean beyond the arc.
Nobody was taking 25 threes a game in 2001. If you dropped them in 2017 they would adapt....all them guys could still shoot.
LeBron bullying his way to the hole WHENEVER he wants. Shaq had about 80 pounds on him. What do you think Shaq would've done bruh
and at a higher percentage.
Bruh I'm not arguing that point, the Cavs can spread teams out but they have a lot of games where those shots aren't falling, the difference is the shots are always there.. the warriors defense is very much overrated, we just saw last game Love go 1-9 and why? Was it because the Warriors were doing something different? No, it's because open shots didn't fall.
But back to the original point, Shaq can't be dealt with we went over that. How is Kobe being dealt with? This is a guy who was averaging 30+ in the mid 2000s.. in 2017 you have Harden averaging 29. Kobe is far superior. How would he be contained, I don't see it.
Fox (.393), Fisher (.397) and Horry (.346) were all capable of hitting the three along with Bryant (.305). They shot better than Bean beyond the arc.
Nobody was taking 25 threes a game in 2001. If you dropped them in 2017 they would adapt....all them guys could still shoot.
LeBron bullying his way to the hole WHENEVER he wants. Shaq had about 80 pounds on him. What do you think Shaq would've done bruh
It's not like Kobe was some mythical finals performer who always gave legendary showings either. He averaged 15 on 36% shooting in 2000 when matched up with Reggie miller. If he were a pro wrestler in 2004, his entrance theme would've been sabotage by the beastie boys. He shot 40% both times he played Boston, and a below average 43% even in his 2009 series against Orlando. He had just one single finals where he even shot at an average rate.
