No future for Oubre?
Lmao at people acting like beal is a bum, he's the Wizards only scorer
No, he'd be considered a liabilityHe still would be the playmaker for the team until he no longer has that role. Same applies to every other general role. My question would be to you - out of all the players you consider "defensive anchors", who is at the bottom of that list?
and who has been least effective at anchoring defenses? I have no idea cause I don't watch all 30 starting centers and try to rank them over one another from 1-30.
fans of other teams really thought they had a shot at BatumLmao at people acting like beal is a bum, he's the Wizards only scorer

But the guy who you quoted doesNo, he'd be considered a liabilityand who has been least effective at anchoring defenses? I have no idea cause I don't watch all 30 starting centers and try to rank them over one another from 1-30.
With things in mind such as poor defensive personnel, inept coaching, injury, etc, I will say if you lead a defense in the bottom 10 of the league, or if you're bottom 10 in your on/off-court defensive stats, you're not a defensive anchor. Unless you pull out some numbers showing Hibbert gave the Lakers at least a top 20 defense while on the floor I'm not about to concede to him being a defensive anchor.

Which is why I said thatBut the guy who you quoted does
Gil has seen every NBA game since the 70s![]()

No, he'd be considered a liability.

i) You don't have to be a center (or start for that matter) to anchor a defenseand who has been least effective at anchoring defenses? I have no idea cause I don't watch all 30 starting centers and try to rank them over one another from 1-30.