add klobuchar to this for me. i mean i know she's polling low AF, but if for some reason she won, i'd have to let the dem party knowHave to keep it on the 100%, the only candidate i'm most likely going to sit it out if they become the nominee is Mayor Pete, just something about the guy that's not clicking for me. Other than that, Warren is my first choice but i'll vote for everyone else except Pete
i've been on the record as to where i stand on this silly donor issue. but this shyt looks even sillier when wanting to ban "rich" donors. i get super-pacs/corp money, but lol @ a "rich" individual's $2800 donation (or $5000 ticket purchase) being shunned and somehow some mcdonald's worker's $27 being ok. they both clearly are utilizing their right to support the candidate they believe in.I held my nose and voted for Hillary. In response, I somehow got blamed for her losing.
So this time, no compromise. If it comes down to convention time and the party just hands Biden the nomination, I'm not voting for him.
If the media is somehow successful at installing Warren into first place, I'll laugh my ass off as she loses to Trump and Dems learn NOTHING again.
But none of this matters. Bernie will be the nominee.
I held my nose and voted for Hillary. In response, I somehow got blamed for her losing.
So this time, no compromise. If it comes down to convention time and the party just hands Biden the nomination, I'm not voting for him.
If the media is somehow successful at installing Warren into first place, I'll laugh my ass off as she loses to Trump and Dems learn NOTHING again.
But none of this matters. Bernie will be the nominee.
Your point isn’t well thought. I responded to two different posts by you at once. If you’re not the one who said she was the only one who didn’t fumble and I’m pretty sure it was you, which is why I specifically pulled out your post - then my bad on that point but everything else you said still was silly. At this point all you nikkas are becoming interchangeable. Whatever else you just wrote to clean it up doesn’t matter to me. I’m not reading all that. Take your daps from your group circle jerk and be happy
.Donors do matter. Look at how Pete switched up when the donors of big corporations got behind him. The point is very obvious that America talks about the “working class” but the outsize influence of money skews towards the interests of those with the disposable income to donate. Both are trying to do the same thing but what one group wants basically imposes harsh conditions on the other class. It is no surprise that Warren and Sanders are mounting left wing campaigns because of online donations that allow them to compete with big money. It takes 1000 working class people to compete with one wealthy person. Obviously you’re not going to get policy reflecting the majority with that. But I generally think Warren and Sanders supporters shouldn’t beef.
12% flipping to the monster Trump is still worse in my book. It's impossible to square why a Bernie supporter would flip to that psychopath. I can see why some Clinton supporters flipped to McCain (experience, vet, moderate). There isn't much grey area between Clinton/McCain/Obama.
You just proved my point. Corp/PAC money =\= “rich” (what is rich in this case...why use such an ambiguous term no one agrees on? @King Kreole would consider a doctor rich whereas I’d be looking more at the $1M in annual earnings mark...) people donations. Someone making a few hundred thousand isn’t some corporate machine and shouldn’t be vilified because they can drop $2800 on a candidate while wage worker x can only drop $28
Yea cause idgaf about y’all Bernie supporters. Showed y’all ass that entire last cycle with that oh I’ma take my ball and go home bullshyt then sit back and say well if y’all just selected my guy bullshyt. Y’all have already thrown out this “oh if they don’t select a progressive type count me out” shyt. Y’all will besmirch every candidate that isn’t your guy and then hide your hands when y’all are called on it
Here is why I do not support Warren:
"She's great because she's obviously lying!"
The scum.
Very poor agreement. You said your pretty sure i’m the one who said it, when i’m definitively telling you I didn’t say that. If you read my posts I clearly stated in two different posts that all of the candidates need to be asked this question. I also said I like Warren answer, but wanted to know specifically what she would do about police reform. Here is my exact post that you conveniently didn’t quoteYour point isn’t well thought. I responded to two different posts by you at once. If you’re not the one who said she was the only one who didn’t fumble and I’m pretty sure it was you, which is why I specifically pulled out your post - then my bad on that point but everything else you said still was silly. At this point all you nikkas are becoming interchangeable. Whatever else you just wrote to clean it up doesn’t matter to me. I’m not reading all that. Take your daps from your group circle jerk and be happy
Again, I said all the candidates need to give specifics including Warren and Bernie. Even in the post you quoted I give Bernie credit for stating that police need to be held accountable.
These were my only two posts on this issue. So I don’t know where you getting all this bullshyt from. You are just making shyt up. There is nothing for me to clean up because my posts are clear. And saying we are all interchangeable is a weak argument you came up with because you clearly misquoted me. You stated what I said was silly, without realizing how foolish you look by flipping out because someone disagreed with your preferred candidate.
Hypothesis: They weren't actual Democrats, but disaffected whites that Sanders brought into the primary.
Then maybe you should consider supporting Warren since she's the candidate that is on record stating that her anti-corruption bill will be her #1 priority when she enters office.Big money in politics doesn't matter to you?
It's like THE central problem.
