Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,757
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,728
Reppin
CookoutGang
Don’t see what your point is supposed to be.

Of course someone will get stuck with the bill. This is a criticism of distribution.
No permutation of M4A that does not support a public option or public/private solution will be immune to this critique.

That's why it's being call dishonest when coming from leftists.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,129
Reputation
3,167
Daps
94,005
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia
you #BidenBoyz are a problem we must admit. every month and we cant get this nikka out the paint :wow:
:russ:Even I’m a little surprised since you got Trump and the far left pretty much working overtime to get him outta here.

When the primary is done, we will welcome you into the #BidenBoyz squad since you’re a former #HillSet member :jawalrus:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,757
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,728
Reppin
CookoutGang
might wanna update that avatar bruh :lolbron:
I think employers should be required to contribute to the healthcare of their workers. I also think they should contribute to child care, provide more paid time off for childbirth and bereavement and a slew of other things.

I'm just laughing at this pearl clutching because it isn't logical and it's attempting to carve out such a nuanced implementation of M4A that it would never happen.

At the end of the day, none of these proposals are going to fly unless something truly amazing happens in the senate.

So I appreciate Warren for putting out detailed plans, especially in this case with regard to funding because ultimately it moves the conversation forward. Some people don't like details. :sas2:
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,053
Daps
132,804
No permutation of M4A that does not support a public option or public/private solution will be immune to this critique.

That's why it's being call dishonest when coming from leftists.
You’re arguing in bad faith.

“This critique” you’re referring to is a provision of her bill, that isn’t even near the biggest criticism of it. The most major criticisms of it are that a head tax is unevenly distributed to toward lower wage workers vs. a payroll tax, and that it is undoable because businesses will avoid the head tax by outsourcing, contracting, and moving workers to firms with less than 50 people. That in turn will lead to the head tax having to go up to make up the lost revenue and death spiral of outsourcing/head tax increasing. Never mind the legal changes needed to the IRS and immigration.

You highlighted one sentence fragment and ignored the larger point and called my post “WOAT level posting” and got dapped by a few idiots like Nap while not even know what that sentence fragment meant until I explained it to you. Then you tried to make up some nonexistent contradiction. Find something better to do.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,757
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,728
Reppin
CookoutGang
You’re arguing in bad faith.

“This critique” you’re referring to is a provision of her bill, that isn’t even near the biggest criticism of it. The most major criticisms of it are that a head tax is unevenly distributed to toward lower wage workers vs. a payroll tax, and that it is undoable because businesses will avoid the head tax by outsourcing, contracting, and moving workers to firms with less than 50 people. That in turn will lead to the head tax having to go up to make up the lost revenue and death spiral of outsourcing/head tax increasing. Never mind the legal changes needed to the IRS and immigration.

You highlighted one sentence fragment and ignored the larger point and called my post “WOAT level posting” and got dapped by a few idiots like Nap while not even know what that sentence fragment meant until I explained it to you. Then you tried to make up some nonexistent contradiction. Find something better to do.
You're attempting to argue against one provision of her proposal in a vacuum while disregarding the rest of her policy positions that addresses those concerns.

It's truly bad faith posting.
 

TrapParis

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,245
Reputation
20
Daps
4,287
uGUEaLm.jpg

Yang would probably be leading if the media wasn't tryna ron paul him...
 
Top