intra vires
Glory to Michigan
So Biden has been on record saying he supports DC and PR statehood, although I haven't seen anything regarding DC from this cycle. Moreover, he supported removing the filibuster in 2013 but was against it in 2005 (note who controlled the Senate) so he may be more amenable to this than we're giving him credit for. I wouldn't hold my breath on the filibuster though.
Yeah, it was politically unwise to run on it because the only people who would hold it against her are were never in play for the primary, so they're irrelevant. She can't move away from it now without it damaging her, so I'm not going to bother speculating it.
The important thing is she's well-positioned and has a clear path forward. Biden does have a comfortable lead in SC and NV though.
We all know there's a slim to none chance M4A is getting passed by the next president. I'm starting to wonder if it was dumb for Warren to attach herself to this approach. If she ran on a public option and strict reforms to drug pricing she'd probably be in the mid 30's/low 40's right now.![]()

Yeah, it was politically unwise to run on it because the only people who would hold it against her are were never in play for the primary, so they're irrelevant. She can't move away from it now without it damaging her, so I'm not going to bother speculating it.
The important thing is she's well-positioned and has a clear path forward. Biden does have a comfortable lead in SC and NV though.