I'm also a little surprised that best ball leagues aren't more popular than they are. For as lazy as so many people are, this would be the perfect style for them.
.
.
.24 spots is the roster max.I'm fine with doing twenty players for the roster. I understand the argument for less than 20 players and more than 20 players. Unlike standard fantasy football, you don't have the ability to add players if someone on your team gets injured, so there is a higher "luck" factor in best ball. You could easily have three QB's on your roster and two of them could be injured by week five.
I think having the twenty spots is a good compromise. The rosters will have a higher talent level with only six teams as well. I think it should be another great season, with hopefully seeing a back to back champion..

What's the amount of time per pick? I think we should lower that some to speed the draft up. Ain't trying to be on all-night doing it.24 spots is the roster max.
No one can complain about injuries fukkin them![]()
I'm also a little surprised that best ball leagues aren't more popular than they are. For as lazy as so many people are, this would be the perfect style for them..
What's the amount of time per pick? I think we should lower that some to speed the draft up. Ain't trying to be on all-night doing it.
.MisterNoName using every second of the clock..
Edit: This was a very quick and smooth draft though.
no one should really have a shyt squad. all boils down to injuries of course.
sameYeah, that's why I took four TE's. Wasn't taking a chance of getting screwed there.
wanted Bijan, but "settled" for Sac00n.I thought about taking a few QB's earlier, but I'm going with the strategy of knowing there is only one QB slot each week and hoping one of mine can perform at a high level.
I love my HB's and I think I have the most home run hitters, but my HB's have had their fair share of injuries over the years. I took a chance and went for it.
