Your prediction?


  • Total voters
    84

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
80,035
Reputation
9,940
Daps
237,118
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Dems should invest in Texas, cause they should invest everywhere. They won’t win this election and probably not the next but it’s about moving the needs so that in 2030’s and beyond you have a shot.

I’m a proponent Howard Dean’s 50 state strategy…byaaaah!

This feels like 2006 all over again

Trump wins re-election (albeit in a non consecutive manner). Like Bush, his popularity tanks during the first year of term #2.

These results mean the U.S. Senate is no guarantee for a GOP hold.

I couldn’t vote back then but I remember volunteering for a family friend running for delegate and for Kweisi Mfume to beat Ben Cardin (which didn’t happen in that primary).
 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
19,328
Reputation
5,715
Daps
76,099
Reppin
#ByrdGang
Do you think this is a good idea?







Thats not what he asked you. He directly confronted you on your claim that the trans issues is going to hurt democrats in elections.

You're so full of shyt. A couple of weeks ago you were talking about how Dems are going to do badly in the 2026 midterms. Now all of a sudden you are dapping posts that say that Dems will blow the GOP out in those same midterms.

You basically run a broke clock strategy, have every opinion all at once so that at least one of them will end up being right.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,510
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,941
Reppin
The Deep State
Thats not what he asked you. He directly confronted you on your claim that the trans issues is going to hurt democrats in elections.

You're so full of shyt. A couple of weeks ago you were talking about how Dems are going to do badly in the 2026 midterms. Now all of a sudden you are dapping posts that say that Dems will blow the GOP out in those same midterms.

You basically run a broke clock strategy, have every opinion all at once so that at least one of them will end up being right.
It literally did in the 2024 election. I’ve posted 3 dozen independent pieces of evidence about this.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,510
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,941
Reppin
The Deep State
Dems should invest in Texas, cause they should invest everywhere. They won’t win this election and probably not the next but it’s about moving the needs so that in 2030’s and beyond you have a shot.

I’m a proponent Howard Dean’s 50 state strategy…byaaaah!
Do you think crocket saying “they’re worried about bathrooms” is a winning strategy?

This is Texas. People dont want men in women’s bathrooms. Just disgusting dismissal.

This trans shyt is a cancer.
 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
19,328
Reputation
5,715
Daps
76,099
Reppin
#ByrdGang
It literally did in the 2024 election. I’ve posted 3 dozen independent pieces of evidence about this.

You are claiming this is such an important electoral issue, right?

Ok, Dems haven't changed their stance on the teans issue, why are they all of a sudden winning elections?

Why did Earl Sears not win the Virginia Gubernatorial race despite running heavily on trans issues?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,510
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,941
Reppin
The Deep State
You are claiming this is such an important electoral issue, right?

Ok, Dems haven't changed their stance on the teans issue, why are they all of a sudden winning elections?

Why did Earl Sears not win the Virginia Gubernatorial race despite running heavily on trans issues?
Many dems have downplayed their emphasis on this like Shapiro and Newsom. Again, there have been pivots. Look at Seth Moulton.

It’s a jump-ball issue that democrats lose.

It’s a key issue that people consider and also it’s just bad politics. It’s also irrational. It’s also unscientific. It’s also immoral and disgusting.

If you personally believe men should be in women’s bathrooms, then you need to actually be bold and shake your cowardice and embrace this stance. This is what you believe and support.
 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
19,328
Reputation
5,715
Daps
76,099
Reppin
#ByrdGang
Many dems have downplayed their emphasis on this like Shapiro and Newsom. Again, there have been pivots. Look at Seth Moulton.

It’s a jump-ball issue that democrats lose.

It’s a key issue that people consider and also it’s just bad politics. It’s also irrational. It’s also unscientific. It’s also immoral and disgusting.

If you personally believe men should be in women’s bathrooms, then you need to actually be bold and shake your cowardice and embrace this stance. This is what you believe and support.

I don't care about your personal views, you have claimed this is an electoral issue.

You are deflecting to avoid answering the question. Shapiro, Newsom, and Moulton were not on the ballot this last November. Why did Democrats do so well despite not having changed their discussion of trans issues?

Why did Winsom Earl Sears not win the Virgina gubernotorial election despite running a very anti-trans campaign?
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,319
Reputation
21,712
Daps
307,195
It literally did in the 2024 election. I’ve posted 3 dozen independent pieces of evidence about this.

None of which were compelling when it's clear that the economy and prices/inflation were the dominant issue in 2024. The fact that we're seeing a complete switch in 2025 voting patterns with the SAME issues (economy, prices/inflation) dominating exit polls makes it clear. The president's party always gets punished when the economy is bad. That's a fact going back hundreds of years.

The trans stuff is a classic example of "bytch eating crackers" syndrome - ie when you are mad and don't like somebody, even the most minor shyt they do becomes a complaint point. An unlikable, old, fumbling president who can't string together multiple coherent sentences or fix a stumbling economy. Well now that's Trump, not Biden. Add in a god awful gerrymandering scheme that is backfiring and republicans could lose 50+ seats next year.

The economy is going to get worse, not better. Jobs are being erased and the federal government isn't even talking about it (AI, automation, etc). Meanwhile the president is hosting bowtie dinners and building a ball room. And you're talking about trannies. Anyone with a brain can see where this is going, what matters and what doesn't. Now if dems take over, ramp up the identity politics bullshyt again while doing nothing to fix the economy? Guess what, they will get punished again. Good thing is that there's a clear indication that our politics have changed. Whether it's Mamdani style affordability or Klein/neolib style abundance, the focus is on helping Americans. I don't expect the next dem nom to spend much of any time talking about highways being racist, who is impacted disproportionately by xyz, stolen land acknowledgements, etc. That shyt is over with. People need economic help.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,510
Reputation
-34,929
Daps
640,941
Reppin
The Deep State
I don't care about your personal views, you have claimed this is an electoral issue.

You are deflecting to avoid answering the question. Shapiro, Newsom, and Moulton were not on the ballot this last November. Why did Democrats do so well despite not having changed their discussion of trans issues?

Why did Winsom Earl Sears not win the Virgina gubernotorial election despite running a very anti-trans campaign?
None of which were compelling when it's clear that the economy and prices/inflation were the dominant issue in 2024. The fact that we're seeing a complete switch in 2025 voting patterns with the SAME issues (economy, prices/inflation) dominating exit polls makes it clear. The president's party always gets punished when the economy is bad. That's a fact going back hundreds of years.

The trans stuff is a classic example of "bytch eating crackers" syndrome - ie when you are mad and don't like somebody, even the most minor shyt they do becomes a complaint point. An unlikable, old, fumbling president who can't string together multiple coherent sentences or fix a stumbling economy. Well now that's Trump, not Biden. Add in a god awful gerrymandering scheme that is backfiring and republicans could lose 50+ seats next year.

The economy is going to get worse, not better. Jobs are being erased and the federal government isn't even talking about it (AI, automation, etc). Meanwhile the president is hosting bowtie dinners and building a ball room. And you're talking about trannies. Anyone with a brain can see where this is going, what matters and what doesn't. Now if dems take over, ramp up the identity politics bullshyt again while doing nothing to fix the economy? Guess what, they will get punished again. Good thing is that there's a clear indication that our politics have changed. Whether it's Mamdani style affordability or Klein/neolib style abundance, the focus is on helping Americans. I don't expect the next dem nom to spend much of any time talking about highways being racist, who is impacted disproportionately by xyz, stolen land acknowledgements, etc. That shyt is over with. People need economic help.

Thermostatic political swings.

I’m asking you if you think is going to play well in Texas.



 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
53,435
Reputation
3,103
Daps
150,619
I don't care about your personal views, you have claimed this is an electoral issue.

You are deflecting to avoid answering the question. Shapiro, Newsom, and Moulton were not on the ballot this last November. Why did Democrats do so well despite not having changed their discussion of trans issues?

Why did Winsom Earl Sears not win the Virgina gubernotorial election despite running a very anti-trans campaign?
He’s just a stupid poster who falls for societal issues like many low-IQ Trump voters. The reason Trump has won twice is because of the economy and the job market. There’s really nothing else to it.

It’s not about trans issues.
It’s not about the border.
It’s not about crime.

It’s the economy, and nothing else. Americans feel that things have not improved since 2006. So when the ecomomy sucks you can blame random immigration, you can blame the tranny you feel raised Healthcare cost, you can say crime raiser food prices in grocery store. Naps a low iq poster who provide fox news media bits. His whole view of politics is " will this play well for fellow low iq bigot voters" that's literally his politics
 

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
19,328
Reputation
5,715
Daps
76,099
Reppin
#ByrdGang
None of which were compelling when it's clear that the economy and prices/inflation were the dominant issue in 2024. The fact that we're seeing a complete switch in 2025 voting patterns with the SAME issues (economy, prices/inflation) dominating exit polls makes it clear. The president's party always gets punished when the economy is bad. That's a fact going back hundreds of years.

The trans stuff is a classic example of "bytch eating crackers" syndrome - ie when you are mad and don't like somebody, even the most minor shyt they do becomes a complaint point. An unlikable, old, fumbling president who can't string together multiple coherent sentences or fix a stumbling economy. Well now that's Trump, not Biden. Add in a god awful gerrymandering scheme that is backfiring and republicans could lose 50+ seats next year.

The economy is going to get worse, not better. Jobs are being erased and the federal government isn't even talking about it (AI, automation, etc). Meanwhile the president is hosting bowtie dinners and building a ball room. And you're talking about trannies. Anyone with a brain can see where this is going, what matters and what doesn't. Now if dems take over, ramp up the identity politics bullshyt again while doing nothing to fix the economy? Guess what, they will get punished again. Good thing is that there's a clear indication that our politics have changed. Whether it's Mamdani style affordability or Klein/neolib style abundance, the focus is on helping Americans. I don't expect the next dem nom to spend much of any time talking about highways being racist, who is impacted disproportionately by xyz, stolen land acknowledgements, etc. That shyt is over with. People need economic help.

Correct.

Many dems have downplayed their emphasis on this like Shapiro and Newsom. Again, there have been pivots. Look at Seth Moulton.

It’s a jump-ball issue that democrats lose.

It’s a key issue that people consider and also it’s just bad politics. It’s also irrational. It’s also unscientific. It’s also immoral and disgusting.

If you personally believe men should be in women’s bathrooms, then you need to actually be bold and shake your cowardice and embrace this stance. This is what you believe and support.

This right here is what this whole thing is about. Not electoral results, not politics, its about this clown thinking something is "immoral and disgusting". All he is is a narcissistic bigot that wants the party to adopt his bigotry. So even if we continue to get more evidence and data showing that the trans issue has no effect on elections, he will evolve his argument because he is too arrogant to ever admit he is wrong.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
26,262
Reputation
4,532
Daps
120,045
Reppin
Detroit
He’s just a stupid poster who falls for societal issues like many low-IQ Trump voters. The reason Trump has won twice is because of the economy and the job market. There’s really nothing else to it.

It’s not about trans issues.
It’s not about the border.
It’s not about crime.

It’s the economy, and nothing else. Americans feel that things have not improved since 2006. So when the ecomomy sucks you can blame random immigration, you can blame the tranny you feel raised Healthcare cost, you can say crime raiser food prices in grocery store. Naps a low iq poster who provide fox news media bits. His whole view of politics is " will this play well for fellow low iq bigot voters" that's literally his politics

It's primarily about white nationalism.

You're right in that Nap wildly overrates the trans thing, but a good economy is not going to make people stop being bigots or stop worrying that it won't be a white country anymore.

There idea that Trump supporters are all broke has been debunked lots of times.

Trump won in 2016 and the economy was reasonably decent.
 
Top