2026 Midterm Elections Thread

[mastermind]

, while also assuming those same voters are too clueless to know who she is or what she stands for, even though she's been a representative in the same state.

We had the convo here and the only thing that came up was her support for Texas farmers—which is ironically probably why she killed in the bastion of racism in rural east Texas.

And yes, I will and can say this because of you these people why vote Crockett,
It will be because she is a fighter and not "because she did this" or "believes in this."

You can't not have any policy solutions on your campaign website and expect people to just know it. That’s not serious and disrespectful.

 

[wire28]

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Not to me, not anymore atleast.

The narrative around this primary just reeks of the kind of contempt I've been noticing from some segments of the Democratic party (voters, insiders, strategists). The double standards and selective complaining about "IDPOL" while people defend the folksy Nazi-friendly guy in Maine playing white identity politics is too hard to ignore.

Yep

If you don't understand why some of her supporters are angry, then you don't want to. Let people be angry, they'll eventually cool off. And stop with the condescending, surface-level critique of her and her supporters.

I’d argue if you can’t understand it you either aren’t around black women regularly or have some sort of contempt for them. But that might make a few people upset. I didn’t even think she was gonna win but I can atleast understand why the literal million people (the majority of them black) are upset she didn’t. The reflexive condescending degradation of those people is quite revealing in a number of ways.

 

[mastermind]

And comparing Black voters supporting her to the Trump cult is a stretch

No, I will compare them to that. It's not a stretch at all for me to say the online black people that are crashing out over Crockett are cult of personality followers because they don't have a strong case to vote for her other than they like what she said.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

We had the convo here and the only thing that came up was her support for Texas farmers—which is ironically probably why she killed in the bastion of racism in rural east Texas.

And yes, I will and can say this because of you these people why vote Crockett,
It will be because she is a fighter and not "because she did this" or "believes in this."

You can't not have any policy solutions on your campaign website and expect people to just know it. That’s not serious and disrespectful.

You can say it all you want, that won't make it right. It won't stop being based on your own contempt for Black voters who don't fit your preferred mold. Like, it's crazy to me how you don't see the gap in your *own* logic. If they support her because she is a "fighter," it has to be a fighter for something. You automatically assume her voters are supporting her for no reason outside of a "cult of personality," because you've already convinced yourself that she is someone who lacks substance, so you're going to build your entire profile around that, even though it's full of contradictions.

You also claimed she disrespected her supporters by not having a website up earlier, at the same time as you dismissed those voters as clueless, even though she has a deep history with those people in her state, just so you can make your "cult of personality" "critique" work. Do you not see anything wrong with this?

No, I will compare them to that. It's not a stretch at all for me to say the online black people that are crashing out over Crockett are cult of personality followers because they don't have a strong case to vote for her other than they like what she said.

It definitely is a stretch because everything you believe about her and her voters is based on an assumption. I doubt you ever compared Bernie Sanders dead-enders to Trump supporters.

 

[88m3]

both sides

 

[wire28]

I guess that retirement package must be hittin right now

 

[mastermind]

You can say it all you want, that won't make it right. It won't stop being based on your own contempt for Black voters who don't fit your preferred mold. Like, it's crazy to me how you don't see the gap in your *own* logic. If they support her because she is a "fighter," it has to be a fighter for something. You automatically assume her voters are supporting her for no reason outside of a "cult of personality," because you've already convinced yourself that she is someone who lacks substance, so you're going to build your entire profile around that, even though it's full of contradictions

What was Crockett fighting for? Hillary Clinton said she was a fighter too. No one could say except for fighting to kill Gadafi.

And no, I don’t give a fukk about a mold of black voter. My criticism is supporting cult of personality types regardless.

It’s also fascinating in this discussion, you haven’t told me what Crockett was fighting for in her time in congress.

And I said she lacks substance because I’ve actually checked her issues and what she voted for in congress. There is no there, there.

It definitely is a stretch because everything you believe about her and her voters is based on an assumption. I doubt you ever compared Bernie Sanders dead-enders to Trump supporters.

No, I'm basing it these people's crash outs over what they are saying.

And with my critique of Crockett, in basing it on her record and her voting record.

She had a chance to win this race and the seat if she ran a better campaign. She didn't.

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

Y’all got pull up the roots in here defending shyt he doesn’t even want to. Bunch of miserable a$$holes