7 Things We Truly Miss About Old-School Dating

[ExodusNirvana]

Therein lies the problem. It's all about the precedent you set.

Women have power over sex. Men will always only want to invest no more than the next man did.

Which is why women guard their past history. Once a man finds her true going price, he's not going to invest any higher.

Pretty much. Once again, feminism demands equality but fails to understand the basic concepts of human sexuality.

In the search for social equality, they are trying to reinvent the wheel biologically and getting confused when that shyt refuses to roll. Why would ANY man be with a woman that everyone gets a turn with? Why would any man be with a woman where he has to do more than the next man in order obtain sex? These are simple fukking concepts breh and yet the logic escapes them...

 

[Action Mike]

Wow, I wonder how your daughters will be treated. Since most women aren't worth it. But their worth your D, right.

You wouldn't wine and dine a woman you THINK netflix and chilled in the past, but you expect women to accept N & C knowing you wined and dined women in the past. Good luck with that type if woman. Couldn't and wouldn't be me.

daughter and partner, great comparison

a first date is about two strangers getting to know each other, would you advise your son to wine n dine every strange girl he meets, or keep it causal then IF she's worth know where to place her.

probably not because all females on planet earth are worth it, two diners all out his pocket of the jump for a girl he met while pumping gas

mommy said their all queens

 

[VFib]

Therein lies the problem. It's all about the precedent you set.

Women have power over sex. Men will always only want to invest no more than the next man did.

Which is why women guard their past history. Once a man finds her true going price, he's not going to invest any higher.

Why invest anything at all if you don't feel she has any worth? Seems like a waste of time to me. I don't invest any time in fukk boys. Why? When there are plenty of worthy men out there. But hey, it's your life.

Oh I forgot, it's all about obtaining sex in the Coli streets, not meaningful relationships.

 

[Gold]

Therein lies the problem. It's all about the precedent you set.

Women have power over sex. Men will always only want to invest no more than the next man did.

Which is why women guard their past history. Once a man finds her true going price, he's not going to invest any higher.

So much truth here

 

[VFib]

daughter and partner, great comparison

a first date is about two strangers getting to know each other, would you advise your son to wine n dine every strange girl he meets, or keep it causal then IF she's worth know where to place her.

probably not because all females on planet earth are worth it, two diners all out his pocket of the jump for a girl he met while pumping gas

mommy said their all queens

I would advise my son to choose wisely in the first place. As soon as she shows that she is not the woman for him, he should leave her alone, not continue seeing her and treat her like shyt "because she isn't worth it"

 

[Action Mike]

Why invest anything at all if you don't feel she has any worth? Seems like a waste of time to me. I don't invest any time in fukk boys. Why? When there are plenty of worthy men out there. But hey, it's your life.

Oh I forgot, it's all about obtaining sex in the Coli streets, not meaningful relationships.

and this is where the very core of this arguement lies. Priorities.

people don't date (and shouldn't) for relationships, it's because your attracted to that person.

and once you get to know them it can splinter into, just sex, short/long term relationships or bushes.

That's it. Simple.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

In my experience men with disposable income don't flinch about frivolities like paying on dates. It's the perpetually broke who create this whole philosophy about not paying because some other dude might not be paying. It's weird. It's immature.

And this "i ain't paying for shyt" philosophy appears in other parts of their life as well but imma stay quiet.

Just me, but I have a lot of disposable income and I'll be damned if I'm gonna waste it on someone / something unworthy. Could be a woman, clothing, food, etc... Just in general, being frivolous for the sake of frivolity is moronic.

 

[mamba]

Pretty much. Once again, feminism demands equality but fails to understand the basic concepts of human sexuality.

In the search for social equality, they are trying to reinvent the wheel biologically and getting confused when that shyt refuses to roll. Why would ANY man be with a woman that everyone gets a turn with? Why would any man be with a woman where he has to do more than the next man in order obtain sex? These are simple fukking concepts breh and yet the logic escapes them...

It's pretty simple, but not to the female mind.

But, they deep down they know they understand it, which is why they are so protective of their past history.

 

[mamba]

Why invest anything at all if you don't feel she has any worth? Seems like a waste of time to me. I don't invest any time in fukk boys. Why? When there are plenty of worthy men out there. But hey, it's your life.

Oh I forgot, it's all about obtaining sex in the Coli streets, not meaningful relationships.

When have men ever just gone out searching for relationships? It's always been about the sex imperative.

When women weren't giving it up as easily, men would have to marry the woman to get access to regular sex. These days, women are serving it up left and right. So, men aren't out here dating for relationships.

We are trying to get as much as we can for as little as possible.

 

[mamba]

and this is where the very core of this arguement lies. Priorities.

people don't date (and shouldn't) for relationships, it's because your attracted to that person.

and once you get to know them it can splinter into, just sex, short/long term relationships or bushes.

That's it. Simple.

Exactly. Even women know this is BS. If they were all about relationships, not the sex imperative and raw attraction, they'd be entering into relationships with simps left and right.

The swagless nikka who brings them flowers and promises to give them comfortable lives.

Nope. That nikka isn't "relationship" material in their eyes. The other nikka is.

 

[Jone2three45]

Therein lies the problem. It's all about the precedent you set.

Women have power over sex. Men will always only want to invest no more than the next man did.

Which is why women guard their past history. Once a man finds a woman's true going price, he's not going to invest any higher.

Pretty much. Once again, feminism demands equality but fails to understand the basic concepts of human sexuality.

In the search for social equality, they are trying to reinvent the wheel biologically and getting confused when that shyt refuses to roll. Why would ANY man be with a woman that everyone gets a turn with? Why would any man be with a woman where he has to do more than the next man in order obtain sex? These are simple fukking concepts breh and yet the logic escapes them...

It's pretty simple, but not to the female mind.

But, they deep down they know they understand it, which is why they are so protective of their past history.

 

[Action Mike]

Exactly. Even women know this is BS. If they were all about relationships, not the sex imperative and raw attraction, they'd be entering into relationships with simps left and right.

The swagless nikka who brings them flowers and promises to give them comfortable lives.

Nope. That nikka isn't "relationship" material in their eyes. The other nikka is.

Exactly, it's like they can't comprehend what their sisters are out here doing even if we tell them.

Dating ain't relationships or nothing.

 

[mamba]

@VFib , here's a hypothetical situation for you.

Let's say you go and cop the new iPhone 6s the day it comes out. It sets you back $500 or so. You feel happy. You buy a new case for it and a bunch of other shyt for it. You take to social media to humble brag about your new purchase. You're one of the first people, you assume, in your circle to own one.

Then, you start getting comments on your posts from your friends/followers, talking about how they also have the phone. As a matter of fact, they got it before it hit the market in secret "free giveaway" marketing campaign put on by Apple. You're sitting there reading the comments like

How would you feel? Would you continue to humble brag on social media?

@Emperor_ReinScarf @marcuz

 

[VFib]

Is this a serious question? You are comparing dating to buying an item?

Good day.

 

[feelosofer]

I think the phone issue is way worse with women. We live in an era where everything is selfie this and instagram that.

As to paying for dates if it's just food and drinks men should pay (within reason).