71% Say Political Correctness Silenced Discussions We Need, 58% Have Views They’re Afraid To Share

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
25,345
Reputation
4,225
Daps
114,252
Reppin
Detroit
DN5gLnnVAAAUelP.jpg

This really just comes down to right-wing media making white people paranoid.

It's extremely unlikely that anybody at this guy's job gives a single fukk about his political opinions, but he's somehow convinced himself that he's a "victim" of some kind of witch hunt.
 
Last edited:

Raptor

All Star
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
5,403
Reputation
495
Daps
11,510
Reppin
World
Poll: 71% of Americans Say Political Correctness Has Silenced Discussions Society Needs to Have, 58% Have Political Views They’re Afraid to Share

Poll: 71% of Americans Say Political Correctness Has Silenced Discussions Society Needs to Have, 58% Have Political Views They’re Afraid to Share


I'd quote the whole article, but it's a little long and we're not really supposed to post whole articles anyway. Give Cato a click, freely of your own volition.:manny:

Brehs who are against whatever "political correctness" is, what views are you afraid to share?:mjgrin:

And what discussions does society need that we're not having because of PC?:sas1:
The harmful effects of fatherlessness on men, and its contribution towards increasing criminality, radicalisation, mental illness, lower grades, higher rates of drop out, welfare dependency and anti social behaviour. I think a lot of the problems in the black community can be attributed to the breakdown of the family. I also think the rise of Cac nationalism amongst these young failed white men has more to do with the disintegration of white family homes, and a lack of a father figure in these pathetic men lives, than real racial "struggle".

Fatherless households is linked to so many social ills, yet nobody likes to talk about it because it means criticising women and their choice of men, and Women are a protected class. Nearly half of all children born today come from unmarried mother homes. Children from single mother homes age faster, have lower IQ than children from traditional families, drop out more often. I don't know why this isnt considered a national emergency, given how much single motherhood has contributed to so many social problems. Society is killing itself by giving so many children the worse start in life.


We can never decrease the wealth gap to other races or black on black crime without solving the breakdown of the family issue first. But nobody is paying attention. In fact, liberals are intent on normalising single motherhood.
 
Last edited:

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,906
Reputation
4,030
Daps
113,138
Reppin
דעת
The thing that I was primarily calling out is that Black folks do have safe spaces, when they tried to state that we don't. Black folks need to stop being afraid of white folks. One of the reasons why blacks have such a huge fear of whites is because we have no economic power. Every other race/ethnicity doesn't fear whites because they know that they have something to bring to the table; which in turn earns them some respect. Asians don't have safe spaces, nor are they afraid of whites because they know that they have their community wealth to act as leverage. We need to stop fearing whites, and instead start studying them and their moves. We need to begin strategizing, learning the laws, and learning the same survival tactics that they use and employ. This also means using our economic means to help rebuild our own communities. We need to stop putting whites on a pedestal, and thinking their above us. As they say, who are they to be equal to?
None of this accounts for Asian's ability to assimilate into white America. That doesn't have as nearly as much to do with their economic strength as it does the fact that Asians are not a perceived threat.
 

Raptor

All Star
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
5,403
Reputation
495
Daps
11,510
Reppin
World
The harmful effects of fatherlessness on men, and its contribution towards increasing criminality, radicalisation, mental illness, lower grades, higher rates of drop out, welfare dependency and anti social behaviour. I think a lot of the problems in the black community that conservatives love to blame on genetics or culture comes down to the breakdown of the family. I also think the rise of Cac nationalism amongst these young failed white men has more to do with the disintegration of white family homes, and a lack of a father figure in these pathetic men lives, than real racial "struggle".

Fatherless households is linked to so many social ills, yet nobody likes to talk about it because it means criticising women and their choice of men, and Women are a protected class. Nearly half of all children born today come from unmarried mother homes. Children from single mother homes age faster, have lower IQ than children from traditional families, drop out more often. I don't know why this isnt considered a national emergency, given how much single motherhood has contributed to so many social problems. Society is killing itself by giving so many children the worse start in life.


We can never decrease the wealth gap to other races or black on black crime without solving the breakdown of the family issue first. But nobody is paying attention. In fact, liberals are intent on normalising single motherhood.

Some interesting statistics about Single motherhood that elitist liberals don't want you to know about.
Statistics
  • 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.
  • 90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.
  • 85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)
  • 80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)
  • 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)

Father Factor in Education – Fatherless children are twice as likely to drop out of school.

  • Children with Fathers who are involved are 40% less likely to repeat a grade in school.
  • Children with Fathers who are involved are 70% less likely to drop out of school.
  • Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to get A’s in school.
  • Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to enjoy school and engage in extracurricular activities.
  • 75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes – 10 times the average.
Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse – Researchers at Columbia University found that children living in two-parent household with a poor relationship with their father are 68% more likely to smoke, drink, or use drugs compared to all teens in two-parent households. Teens in single mother households are at a 30% higher risk than those in two-parent households.

  • 70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)
  • 85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)
Father Factor in Incarceration – Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household experienced the highest odds. A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail.

Father Factor in Crime – A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family structure significantly predicts delinquency. Adolescents, particularly boys, in single-parent families were at higher risk of status, property and person delinquencies. Moreover, students attending schools with a high proportion of children of single parents are also at risk. A study of 13,986 women in prison showed that more than half grew up without their father. Forty-two percent grew up in a single-mother household and sixteen percent lived with neither parent

Father Factor in Child Abuse – Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect. The overall rate of child abuse and neglect in single-parent households is 27.3 children per 1,000, whereas the rate of overall maltreatment in two-parent households is 15.5 per 1,000.

Daughters of single parents without a Father involved are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 711% more likely to have children as teenagers, 164% more likely to have a pre-marital birth and 92% more likely to get divorced themselves.

Adolescent girls raised in a 2 parent home with involved Fathers are significantly less likely to be sexually active than girls raised without involved Fathers.

  • 43% of US children live without their father [US Department of Census]
  • 90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
  • 80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes. [Criminal Justice & Behaviour, Vol 14, pp. 403-26, 1978]
  • 71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999]
  • 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]
  • 85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. [Center for Disease Control]
  • 90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother. [Wray Herbert, “Dousing the Kindlers,” Psychology Today, January, 1985, p. 28]
  • 71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. [National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools]
  • 75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes. [Rainbows f for all God’s Children]
  • 70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father. [US Department of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988]
  • 85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. [Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Department of Corrections, 1992]
  • Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. [US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999]
Census Fatherhood Statistics
  • 64.3 million: Estimated number of fathers across the nation
  • 26.5 million: Number of fathers who are part of married-couple families with their own children under the age of 18.
    Among these fathers –

    • 22 percent are raising three or more of their own children under 18 years old (among married-couple family households only).
    • 2 percent live in the home of a relative or a non-relative.
  • 2.5 million: Number of single fathers, up from 400,000 in 1970. Currently, among single parents living with their children, 18 percent are men.
    Among these fathers –

    • 8 percent are raising three or more of their own children under 18 years old.
    • 42 percent are divorced, 38 percent have never married, 16 percent are separated and 4 percent are widowed. (The percentages of those divorced and never married are not significantly different from one another.)
    • 16 percent live in the home of a relative or a non-relative.
    • 27 percent have an annual family income of $50,000 or more.
  • 85 percent: Among the 30.2 million fathers living with children younger than 18, the percentage who lived with their biological children only.
    • 11 percent lived with step-children
    • 4 percent with adopted children
    • < 1 percent with foster children
    Recent policies encourage the development of programs designed to improve the economic status of low-income nonresident fathers and the financial and emotional support provided to their children. This brief provides ten key lessons from several important early responsible fatherhood initiatives that were developed and implemented during the 1990s and early 2000s. Formal evaluations of these earlier fatherhood efforts have been completed making this an opportune time to step back and assess what has been learned and how to build on the early programs’ successes and challenges.While the following statistics are formidable, the Responsible Fatherhood research literature generally supports the claim that a loving and nurturing father improves outcomes for children, families and communities.

  • Children with involved, loving fathers are significantly more likely to do well in school, have healthy self-esteem, exhibit empathy and pro-social behavior, and avoid high-risk behaviors such as drug use, truancy, and criminal activity compared to children who have uninvolved fathers.
  • Studies on parent-child relationships and child wellbeing show that father love is an important factor in predicting the social, emotional, and cognitive development and functioning of children and young adults.
  • 24 million children (34 percent) live absent their biological father.
  • Nearly 20 million children (27 percent) live in single-parent homes.
  • 43 percent of first marriages dissolve within fifteen years; about 60 percent of divorcing couples have children; and approximately one million children each year experience the divorce of their parents.
  • Fathers who live with their children are more likely to have a close, enduring relationship with their children than those who do not.
  • Compared to children born within marriage, children born to cohabiting parents are three times as likely to experience father absence, and children born to unmarried, non-cohabiting parents are four times as likely to live in a father-absent home.
  • About 40 percent of children in father-absent homes have not seen their father at all during the past year; 26 percent of absent fathers live in a different state than their children; and 50 percent of children living absent their father have never set foot in their father’s home.
  • Children who live absent their biological fathers are, on average, at least two to three times more likely to be poor, to use drugs, to experience educational, health, emotional and behavioral problems, to be victims of child abuse, and to engage in criminal behavior than their peers who live with their married, biological (or adoptive) parents.
  • From 1995 to 2000, the proportion of children living in single-parent homes slightly declined, while the proportion of children living with two married parents remained stable.
 

Raptor

All Star
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
5,403
Reputation
495
Daps
11,510
Reppin
World
None of this accounts for Asian's ability to assimilate into white America. That doesn't have as nearly as much to do with their economic strength as it does the fact that Asians are not a perceived threat.
Asians also have one of the strongest family units, which is a huge advantage to have.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,104
Reputation
4,485
Daps
89,204
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
This really just comes down to right-wing media making white people paranoid.

It's extremely unlikely that anybody at this guy's job gives a single fukk about his political opinions, but he's somehow convinced himself that he's a "victim" of some kind of witch hunt.

I disagree if they feel it isn’t discrimination that has kept women from being hired/advancing at their company, they are better off keeping it to their self.

The feminist movement is much more aggressive than you are aware of or giving it credit for.
 
Last edited:

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,751
Daps
2,325
None of this accounts for Asian's ability to assimilate into white America. That doesn't have as nearly as much to do with their economic strength as it does the fact that Asians are not a perceived threat.

Chinese people aren't in the United States doing all kinds of crazy shyt. Thats why they are not a threat. China, taiwan, singapore, and hong Kong are some the most crime-free areas on earth.

Filipinos for the most part don't anything crazy either. Filipinos and Chinese make up the vast majority of asian americans, so Asians have a good reputation in America.


However, I grew up the Central valley of California where most Asians were either Cambodian, Vietnamese or Hmong. It was completely different. Asian neighborhood meant crime filled ghetto with a high murder rate. The cops definitely went out of their way to fukk with Asians, and most people did not like Asians. To this day, these groups are assiociated with high crime rates, low educational attainment, low test scores and poverty.

If the majority of Asians in the United States were from mainland South East Asia, there wouldn't be any model minority stereotype.
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,751
Daps
2,325
Im sorry, but everything you've typed here is a load of BS. This is further demonstrated the the immediate turn to emotions and deflecting that black people, especially black men turn to when countered an an actual LOGICAL argument. Hell, on here, and just about every other sub forum, any time you tell blacks the truth about themselves, they want to turn and call you a "cac", a c00n, or an uncle tom. Most negroes don't even know how to truly argue logically; and I can throw up some fine examples of such. When you say confronting what they don't like, and "Non blacks are generally weak people who are scared and run away from confrontation" - Do you mean the wild, emotional physical, and verbal confrontation that many of these nikkas try to engage in? As for corporate america, blacks, and especially black men are not even in the high positions of power at most fortune 500 companies, or any of their sub divisions. Black people typically end up getting the shyt end of the stick due to their inability to speak up, and if we do, then we run the risk of losing our jobs, or being suspended.

What other race of people has so many community "leaders" (turncoats), is so highly in favor of affirmative action, and even has a group called blacklivesmatter? If those aren't things set up for the safe spaces of blacks, then I don't know what is. What the hell would you call a black university then? Do you see any native all native american, chinese, or hispanic universities? Black folks are the originators of the concept of a safe space. Why is there a "black twitter" or a "black tumblr?" Even the coli is regarded by many as a "safe space for black folks."

Black people can easily detach from personal feelings from arguments? Is that why we are at the bottom rung of every social, economic sphere, and why an overwhelming majority of black men are incarcerated? Black people- american blacks) are more emotional than anything.

Nobody is trying to hear bad stuff about their own tribe. That's not unique to black people.

In the white liberal land, you can't discuss weirdo trannies, gays and pedophiles. You cant respect or worship jesus. You can't advocate any socially Conservative stance like modesty in women's clothing, not coming to work with a "man-bun", abstaining, or having a disciplined lifestyle.

You can't discuss the benefits of capitalism.

The coli is one of the few mainline websites where men can openly discuss beautiful women using locker-room banter.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2016
Messages
1,263
Reputation
-240
Daps
2,107
Nobody is trying to hear bad stuff about their own tribe. That's not unique to black people.

In the white liberal land, you can't discuss weirdo trannies, gays and pedophiles. You cant respect or worship jesus. You can't advocate any socially Conservative stance like modesty in women's clothing, not coming to work with a "man-bun", abstaining, or having a disciplined lifestyle.

You can't discuss the benefits of capitalism.

The coli is one of the few mainline websites where men can openly discuss beautiful women using locker-room banter.

No one wants to hear bad stuff about their own tribe, but black people however are the only race/group of people who won't clean up the shyt in their own community. We're the only group of people who are at the bottom of every social/economic and political aspect. Therefore our issues and plights we face have a more severe ripple effect, and do greater damage.

In white liberal land. Key word here is "WHITE LIBERALS." White conservatives/leaning discuss these things in very high frequency.

"The coli is one of the few mainline websites where men can openly discuss beautiful women using locker-room banter."- This is pretty much the only thing I've seen black men on here discuss freely, and rather "liberally." The coli is highly intolerant of negative news, information and truths about the black community; so much so that if you criticize a lot of the deeply held convictions of the vacuum, which is black thought, you are criticized harshly, negged, and even sent to the bushes. I've seen the same shyt repeatedly in other black spaces.
 
Top