
I don't like the move either...but they did it for Ingram....These dummies really traded a solid young big man that gave us size and scoring in the paint for some bum shooter that can’t shoot. If I wanted Brian Cook I’d watch lowlights from the mid-00s.
Plus iirc, Zu can shoot threes but decided against it as it isn’t a strength. They better have their eyes on the next Jokic or else this was just dumb.
These dummies really traded a solid young big man that gave us size and scoring in the paint for some bum shooter that can’t shoot. If I wanted Brian Cook I’d watch lowlights from the mid-00s.
Plus iirc, Zu can shoot threes but decided against it as it isn’t a strength. They better have their eyes on the next Jokic or else this was just dumb.


I don't like the move either...but they did it for Ingram....
Ingram
Rondo/zo
Bullocks
Kcp
Muscala
That will open the floor for him and they can separate him and kuz minutes longer
ZupacIf you wanted melo you could have just waived beasley.
If you needed a stretch 4, you could have just waited for buyout options. Markieff is better than muscala (and the lakers have interest in him,) and melo and could have been had without giving up zubac. Hell, id rather frank kaminsky instead of giving up zubac
Exactly, Markieff is a WAY better option for the stretch 4 we needed. Zu would’ve helped us big time imo especially given how cheap his contract is. Even if you open the spot for Melo it’s so many players that fit our needs more that’ll also be on the buyout market.
I agree, but one of the factor that is a great determiner in all of this is the perception some have of the lakers now (at least what the media is pushing), that its a possible toxic environment. That and the consideration of available mins.
Been behind on my nba shyt.
How unlikely is it we don’t make the playoffs?